learning from serious case reviews and audits
Download
Report
Transcript learning from serious case reviews and audits
LEARNING FROM SERIOUS CASE
REVIEWS AND AUDITS
FOR BOURNEMOUTH AND POOLE LSCB
JUNE 2013
1
Training MatterS
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
AIM
All participants will understand serious case review learning
and be able to relate this to their work
By the end of the session participants will be able to
State the key messages from recent local serious case reviews
and audits
Apply this learning to their team’s own work to improve
practice
2
Training MatterS
BLAME
Person centred approach to explaining errors creates blame
culture driven by society’s desire to avoid risk
World seems less dangerous – someone to blame
Once we know the outcome, over-estimate what could have
been anticipated
Procedures are about visible tasks but judgement and
expertise required
(Munro 2010)
3
Training MatterS
PRACTICE LEARNING EVENTS
Future SCR’s and audits
Will be looking systematically at what went wrong and well
4
– moving to understanding, not blame
Meaningful involvement of practitioners and family members
Seeking to understand practice from the viewpoint of
individuals and organisations at the time, not hindsight
Looks not just at what professionals did but why they acted as
they did
Develops key themes for analysis and look at lived experience
of the child
Training MatterS
WHICH CHILDREN MOST AT RISK?
Vulnerability factors
Co-morbidity of parental problems
Cumulation of negative childhood experiences
Genetic transmission of parental disorders
Involvement in parental delusions
Drug use
Protective factors
Quick resolution of parental problems
Day to day presence of a safe caring adult
Child’s own temperament, coping strategies
(Cleaver et al 2011)
5
Training MatterS
FAMILY C6 CASE AUDIT
10 week baby bruising and multiple fractures
Mother history of depression and mental health problems
Variable engagement with services
Domestic violence history
Use of historical information to inform assessments
Questioning ongoing issues
6
Training MatterS
FAMILY C8
Tragic suicide of mother of 4 children
Significant long term mental health needs
August 11 CP plans for younger 2 – mother’s
unpredictable behaviour
December 11, mother told application for care orders,
killed herself
7
Training MatterS
FAMILY C8 Cont.
Good practice
Regular communication between professionals
Child-centred approach
Responsiveness to mother despite volatility
Robust recording
Challenges
Working with parents behaving inconsistently and at
times mental health needs dominated parenting
Geographical relocation affected mental health support
8
Training MatterS
FAMILY C8 Cont.
Delay in full mental health assessment of mother’s
parenting capacity
Psychiatric reports from 2006 not included in current
assessments
Value of shared chronologies
Importance of maintaining focus on child in need once
CP plan ceased
Importance of using historic information when further
pregnancies
9
Training MatterS
LINKS WITH MENTAL HEALTH
PROBLEMS 1
Parents with mental health problems
high risk of living in poverty
very low employment rates
isolation
fear and experiences of stigma, discrimination.
⅓ young carers have a parent with mental health problems
Most parents not physical risk to children
10
10
Training MatterS
LINKS WITH MENTAL HEALTH
PROBLEMS 2
More risk to safety when parents psychotic and multiple
mental health difficulties and socially deprived
Parents with mental health problems may be less
available emotionally to children
Compensation by other relatives and friends
(J Tunnard 2006)
Toxic trio – risks to welfare of children is 14 times
where DV, mental ill health and abused in past
themselves
(Cleaver et al 2011)
11
11
Training MatterS
LINKS WITH MENTAL HEALTH
PROBLEMS 3
Impacts more further into system
43% of conferenced families
(Brophy 2003)
33% of fatal child abuse
(Falkov 96 )
60% national SCR 09-11 parents mental health issues
12
12
Training MatterS
GROUP WORK 1
How can we more effectively manage the welfare of
children where parents have mental health problems or
substance misuse?
How can we keep more useful chronologies and use
historical information more effectively to protect
children?
“live tool for improving practice” and “vital tool to assist
reflection, analysis, decision-making, planning, and
intervention in the lives of children and their families”
(Hollows 2012)
13
Training MatterS
CASE AUDIT M/C
December 2011 concerns children not sufficient care and
supervision, home conditions poor and mother misusing
alcohol.
Discussion with children – unannounced visit at end of
school day – removal of youngest children of 4.
Identifying and responding to concerns
Long history with school, HV and EWS
Common response of poor engagement by mother
17 referrals to Social Care since 1999 as concern peaked
Unusually high range of referring agencies
Sect 47 not met and no Family Support Service
14
Training MatterS
CASE AUDIT M/C Cont.
2004 attempts by Social Care to engage - closed
Chronology not updated – cumulative and repetitive concerns
When closed, not usually multi-agency plan for follow up.
Services over optimistic re sustaining improvements
Referral agencies could have challenged Social Care decisions
Father was not in family home and not involved in assessment
or planning
Little involvement with children by Social Care
Older children caring for younger two – one 2004 referral to
young carer’s service.
15
Training MatterS
CASE AUDIT M/C Cont.
Children protective of their mother
Hard to engage/ responses
Health managed proactively – home visits
School proactive – compensatory care
multi-agency planning meeting would have helped
Bruising of 8 month old – insufficient corroboration of
16
mother’s account – no medical or further assessment.
Poor school attendance
Indicators of neglect/poverty over sustained period
Overcrowded accommodation
Alcohol misuse and mental health problems in mother
disclosed but not diagnosed or treated or effect on
children considered
Training MatterS
GROUP WORK 2
How can we ensure the voice of the child is not lost?
In what ways can we communicate better between agencies
when there are different views about the level of response
needed?
17
Training MatterS
INTER-AGENCY WORKING
Challenges about listening to agency concerns and
accepting views of others
Difficult for schools to maintain their support role
Insufficient acknowledgement of their role
Insufficient weight to school’s concerns
Unreasonably high thresholds for neglect and emotional
abuse
Inadequate feedback and advice
Insufficient timely information about individual families
Often therefore supported single agency as school
and not part of multi-agency plan
18
Training MatterS
(Ward et al 2012)
ESCALATION AND CHALLENGE
Need to be able to challenge other agencies
Pan Dorset multi-agency escalation protocol
Address concerns at lowest level possible within 5 days or
19
less – practitioners
Unresolved concerns about safety and welfare of child
escalated first to team manager level within 5 days or less
Passed up to Service manager, head teacher level
Up to heads of service if remains unresolved and on to LSCB
Record and date at every stage
Training MatterS
NATIONAL RESEARCH - THE VOICE OF
THE CHILD : LEARNING LESSONS FROM
SCR 2010 1
67 SCR
Importance of listening to the child
Child not seen frequently by professionals or not asked
20
their views or feelings
Safe trusting environment needed for child to share views
What is the child trying to tell us?
Recognise behaviour as a means of communication
Agencies didn’t listen to adults who spoke up for child –
neighbours, grandparents
Training MatterS
NATIONAL RESEARCH - THE VOICE OF
THE CHILD : LEARNING LESSONS FROM
SCR 2010 2
Parents and carers prevented access to child
Practitioners focused on parents, especially vulnerable ones,
and overlooked implications for child
Over reliance on parents’ report
Tendency to overlook fathers and male partners
Agencies didn’t interpret findings well enough to protect
child
21
Training MatterS
NATIONAL RESEARCH - THE VOICE OF
THE CHILD : LEARNING LESSONS FROM
SCR 2010 3
Direct observation of babies and young children and linking
22
this to risk factors
Assess disabled children and protection needed
Consider risks to children if professionals concerned for
own safety
Protection for home educated children
Implications of DV for unborn child
Vulnerabilities of young carers
Training MatterS
PROTOCOL FOR NON MOBILE CHILDREN
All non mobile children with bruise or burn referred to Social
Care and paediatrician
All non mobile with bleeding nose or mouth, swelling of head,
reduced movement in a limb discussed with paediatrician
Where referral, Social Care will
Take and record details
Check if known
Discuss with paediatrician
23
Training MatterS
CASE REVIEW SD
Family moved between areas
6 children, 3 fathers
Concern about oldest – ADHD and violent
July 2010 Referral to Social Care – concerns about mother and
24
father (of youngest 4) ability to parent, safety and hygiene
March 2011 – father left, greater concerns
Mother
Mental ill health
Home Conditions poor
Basic care chaotic
Older child (11) main carer
Training MatterS
SD Cont.
November 2011 Children’s services requested dad take
care of 4 youngest
CP plan for neglect
December 2011 SD hospital
Critically unwell
Diabetes
Frozen watchfulness
Low weight
Developmental delay due to environment
25
Training MatterS
SD Cont.
Lack of chronologies
No multi-agency meeting
Health professionals were unaware of the state of the
home
Reviewing of CIN needs to be robust and have clear
actions planned
26
Training MatterS
RULE OF OPTIMISM
Tendency of workers to over estimate ability of parents
to understand professional concern and make the
necessary changes
(Selwyn 2006)
Reasoning processes of social workers
Valued family maintenance and sought to bolster this
Viewed service users as capable of change and honest
(Keddell 2011)
Assessment of facts and interpretation challenging for all
workers
27
Training MatterS
GROUP WORK 3
How can universal and specialist services work more
effectively and assertively intervene in neglect cases?
What can help to challenge the drift towards optimism by
professionals?
28
Training MatterS
HARD TO REACH FAMILIES
Lack of parental engagement leads to less intervention
due to non-cooperation. Obstruction reduces access to
evidence
(Farmer and Lutman 2009)
Quick turn around of assessments makes it harder to identify
families accurately
(Broadhurst 2010)
Hostile parents can trigger defensive, impersonal workers –
low levels of listening and empathy
(Howe 2010)
29
Training MatterS
WORKING HARDER TO ENGAGE WITH
CHILDREN,YOUNG PEOPLE AND FAMILIES
MORE EFFECTIVELY
W case audit
Where agency refers to another and failure to engage – may
30
not realise
Make effective clear referral
Communicating clearly with family
Raising confidence of family in specialist service
Communicating to specialist service any potential difficulties
and any strategies that may work
Making appropriate and personal invitation
Training MatterS
WORKING HARDER TO ENGAGE WITH
CHILDREN,YOUNG PEOPLE AND FAMILIES
MORE EFFECTIVELY
Use of language
Appropriate responses if family fail to attend and to
repeated failure to attend
Identifying families who are disguising lack of cooperation
and compliance or are hostile or violent
Appropriate responses to complaints about service
providers as an avoidance technique
Ongoing communication with the referring agency
31
Training MatterS
NEGLECT GUIDANCE 1
Easy to focus on adult needs and lose sight of the child
(Burgess et al 2011)
To prevent drift and “start again”
Helps with uncertainty about thresholds
Compensatory care
Disguised compliance or false engagement
Rule of optimism
Clarify fact and opinion
Younger child more risk
32
Training MatterS
NEGLECT GUIDANCE 2
What is it like for this child in this family?
Focus on family but not to exclusion of child
Share information
Get help – environmental health, fire service
Framework for recording conditions in home
Graded Care Profile
33
Training MatterS
BABY J SERIOUS CASE REVIEW
Died aged 5 months 2012
Co-sleeping on sofa with mother who had consumed large
amount of alcohol
Parents not living together, 2nd child
DV concerns in relationship – not taken seriously enough
History of mother would have led to concerns – troubled
adolescent and risky behaviour. Maternal risk factors:
Alcohol and drug misuse
Criminal activity including assaults
Childhood history of watching DV
Family history of SA
34
Training MatterS
BABY J Cont.
Coped well with first child
Referral to Children’s Social Care 6 wks before death after
35
complaints to Housing by neighbour – did not meet
threshold for action, no feedback
Little attention to father of two children – lack of curiosity
How effective were early help arrangements?
Response to safeguarding concerns timely?
Further promotion of safe sleeping learning
Family using children’s centre- 3 assessment models in use
Dangers of start again and rule of optimism
Training MatterS
ENGAGING FATHERS
Men much less engaged in CP process than women
60% men not talked to prior to initial CP meeting
DV underplayed and sanitised
Little attention to men’s practical caring skills
Violent men more likely to be engaged than non-violent
– categorized as irrelevant unless a threat
(Baynes and Holland 2012)
36
Training MatterS
LINKS WITH SUBSTANCE MISUSE
Parents misusing substances
52% of case on CP plan
62% proceedings parental substance misuse
‘the more serious type of case being studied, the higher the
proportion in which substance misuse was an issue’
(Forrester and Harwin 2006)
alcohol central substance of concern
high incidence of crack cocaine use
both strongly correlated with violence
(Manning 2009)
Parental abuse of alcohol or drugs in 50% of neglect cases
(Dunn 2002)
42% national SCR 09-11 parents misusing substances
33% fathers and 66% mothers with problem drug use still
living with their children
37
37
(Advisory council on misuse of drugs 2003)
Training MatterS
LINKS WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Two thirds of conference cases
(Sloan 2003)
Physical risks , 30-66% of children living with DV direct
abuse
(Edleson J 1999)
Emotional abuse of witnessing violence
65% of national SCR 09-11 DV
86% one of three toxic factors
Twice as likely as non-DV houses to have confirmed
neglect by age 5 years
(Davies and ward 2012)
38
38
Training MatterS
EFFECT OF CHILDHOODS ON PARENTS
Parents who were physically abused or neglected in
childhood were more likely to treat their own children the
same way –
Distorted beliefs
Unrealistic expectations
Not age-appropriate
Over-reacting or coercive parenting
Harsh punishment
(Hindley et al 2006)
39
Training MatterS
INTERVENTION WITH FAMILIES
Parents who succeeded in making changes
Less likely to have experienced abuse
To have come to terms with removal of older child
Gained insight from that
Used support
Many parents go through the motions – appointments, never really
active partners, some active saboteurs
Some defining moment – change to meet baby’s needs
SW assessments failed to focus on core issue
LT support or intervention not there
(Ward et al 2012)
40
Training MatterS
GROUP WORK 4
How are we doing engaging hard to reach families? How can
we improve this?
Why do we keep hearing the same messages in SCR’s and
audits? What blocks are there that stop change happening?
41
Training MatterS
CO-SLEEPING RESEARCH
Link between bed sharing and sudden infant death
syndrome
UNICEF study 1472 cot deaths called for definite stand
against all bed sharing especially up to 3 months
Increased risk with recent consumption of drugs or
alcohol
(Blair 2009)
Different opinions on co-sleeping for non risk groups
Co-sleeping guidance and e-training for all front line
staff and for parents– Dorset Healthcare 2011 –
pathways.
42
Training MatterS
CO-SLEEPING GUIDANCE
Safest place for baby to sleep is in cot by bed
Sleeping with baby on sofa puts baby at greatest risk
Baby shouldn’t share a bed with
Smoker
Consumed alcohol
Taken legal or illegal drugs making them sleepy
Increased risk of SIDS
Parents in low SOE groups
Parents who currently abuse alcohol or drugs
Young mothers with more than one child
43
Premature infants and low birth weight
Training MatterS
SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN
AND YOUNG PEOPLE
Up to 18
Danger of seeing risk as informed consenting choice
5 years age difference, exchange of goods
Lists indicators
Child sexual exploitation risk assessment tool and matrix
Low risk – single agency response
Medium risk- TAC and CAF
Medium/high risk – Refer to Social Care, strategy meeting,
possible S 47 and interim safeguarding plan
44
©Training MatterS