literature_review

Download Report

Transcript literature_review

The Literature Review

William Oduro FRNR, CANR,KNUST November, 2012 1

The Literature Review

The review of the literature is defined as

a broad, comprehensive, in depth, systematic, and critical review of scholarly publications, unpublished scholarly print materials, audiovisual materials, and personal communications 2

The Literature Review

    The review of the literature is traditionally considered a systematic and critical review of the most important published literature on a particular topic.

scholarly Scholarly literature and non print forms refer to published and unpublished data based literature and conceptual literature materials found in print Data based literature research Conceptual research concepts reports of completed reports of theories, 3

Relationship Of Review Of Literature To Theory, Research, Education And Practice

Research Review of Literature Education Practice Theory

4

Purposes of Literature Review

The overall purpose of literature review is to

Research purposes of literature review:

1.

discover

knowledge

Determines an appropriate research design/method (instruments, data collection and analysis methods) for answering the research question 2.

Determines the need for replication of a well designed study or refinement of a study 5

Purposes of Literature Review

Non Research purposes of literature review:

1.

Determines what is known about a subject, concept or problem 2.

Determines gaps, consistencies & inconsistencies about a subject, concept or problem 3.

4.

Discovers unanswered questions about a subject, concept or problem Describes strengths & weaknesses of designs, methods of inquiry and instruments used in earlier works 6

Purposes of Literature Review

Non Research purposes of literature review:

5.

Discovers conceptual traditions used to examine problems 6.

7.

Generates useful research questions or projects/activities for the discipline Promotes development of protocols & policies related to e.g. nursing practice 8.

Uncovers a new practice intervention, or gains support for changing a practice intervention 7

Differences of Research & Non Research Purposes

Whether a nurse is developing a research study, a curriculum, or a patient protocol, s/he should base that project on a critical review of the literature

The difference lies in the type of outcome produced

8

The Use of Literature Review in Quantitative Research

Theoretical framework

The literature defines concepts and terms in relation to the study 

Problem statement and hypotheses

The literature review helps to determine what is known and not known; to uncover gaps, consistencies, or inconsistencies, and/or to reveal unanswered questions about a subject, concept or problem

The literature review allows for refinement of research problems and questions and/or hypotheses

9

The Use of Literature Review in Quantitative Research

Design and method

The literature review reveals strengths and weaknesses of designs and methods of previous research studies 

Outcome of the analysis (findings, implications, and recommendations)

The literature review is used to discuss the results or findings of a study. The discussion relates the study literature ’ s findings to what was or was not found in the review of 10

The Literature Review and Consumers of Research

Literature review helps

consumers

of research e.g. students to:

1.

Efficiently retrieve an adequate amount of scholarly literature using computer and print resources 2.

3.

Critically evaluate data based and conceptual material Critically evaluate a review of the literature (the entire compilation of conceptual and data based literature) based on accepted reviewing criteria 11

Literature Review Synonymous

Conceptual literature

 Theoretical literature  Scholarly non research literature  Scholarly work  Soft versus hard science literature  Review of the literature article  Concept analysis article

Data based literature

 Empirical literature  Scientific literature  Research literature  Scholarly research literature  Research study  study 12

Steps of Searching the Literature

Determine concept/issue/topic/problem Conduct computer (and/or hand) search Weed out irrelevant sources before printing Organize sources from printout for retrieval Retrieve relevant sources Conduct preliminary reading and weed out irrelevant sources Critically read each source (summarize & critique each source) Synthesize critical summaries

Primary and Secondary Sources

Primary source: developed the theory or conducted the research is written by a person(s) who Secondary source: other than is written by a person(s) the individual who developed the theory or conducted the research 14

The Role of Secondary Sources

Two general reasons for using secondary sources:

1.

A primary sources is literally unavailable 2.

A secondary source can provide different ways of looking at an issue or problem

Secondary sources should not be overused

15

  

Pitfalls of Secondary Sources

All of the theory fully presented ’ s concepts or aspects of the study and/or definitions may not be If all concepts or aspects are included, the definitions may be collapsed or paraphrased to such a degree that it no longer represents the theorist ’ s actual work The critique (whether positive or negative) is based on the presentation of incomplete or interpreted data and therefore less useful to the consumer 16

Critiquing Criteria for a Review of the Literature 1.

2.

3.

4.

Does the literature review uncover gaps or inconsistencies in knowledge? How does the review reflect critical thinking?

Are all the relevant concepts and variables included in the review?

Dose the summary of each reviewed study reflect the essential components of the study design?

17

Critiquing Criteria for a Review of the Literature 5.

6.

7.

8.

Does the critique of each reviewed study include strengths, weaknesses, or limitations of the design; conflicts; and gaps or inconsistencies in information in relation to the area of interest?

Were both conceptual and data based literature included?

Were primary sources mainly included?

Is there a written summary synthesis of the reviewed scholarly literature?

18

Critiquing Criteria for a Review of the Literature 9.

10.

11.

Does the synthesis summary follow a logical sequence that leads the reader to why there is the need for the particular research or non research project?

Did the organization of the reviewed studies (i.e. chronologically, or according to concepts/variables, or type/design of study) follow logically, enhancing the ability of the reader to evaluate the need for the particular research or non research project?

Does the literature review follow the purpose(s) of the study or non research project?

19

Thank You

20