Jeffrey Linzer Sr., MD, MICP, FAAP, FACEP Associate Medical

Download Report

Transcript Jeffrey Linzer Sr., MD, MICP, FAAP, FACEP Associate Medical

Teaching physician rules
Jeffrey Linzer Sr., MD, MICP, FAAP, FACEP
Associate Medical Director for Business Affairs & Compliance
Emergency Pediatric Group
Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston & Hughes Spalding
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia
Teaching physician rules
• Based on Medicare guidelines
• Generally accepted and used by Medicaid and
commercial payers
• non-Medicare providers are not obligated to
follow the rule
• Fellows are considered residents
• whether program is ACGME approved or not
• some non-Medicare payers will exempt fellows
from some or all of the rules
Teaching physician
• Teaching physician must show personal
involvement in the
• evaluation
• development of the plan of care
• and treatment of the patient
• must be clearly defined as the attending physician
• Cannot just co-sign resident note
• “agree with above and plan as written”
Teaching physician documentation
• The teaching physician does not need to redocument the H&P
• Must write a note personalized for that patient that
shows that the teaching physician
•
•
•
•
has examined the patient
has reviewed the resident’s note
has reviewed the plan of care as written
notes any modifications to resident’s findings or plan of
care
• The combination of the resident and teaching
physician note may be used to determine the level of
documentation
Examples of ‘minimally acceptable
documentation”
• Patient seen at same time with resident
• “I was present with resident during the history
and exam. I discussed the case with the resident
and agree with the findings and plan as
documented in the resident’s note.”
• “I saw the patient with the resident and agree with
the resident’s findings and plan.”
Examples of ‘minimally acceptable
documentation”
• Patient with or without the resident with the
teaching physician independently performing
the critical or key portion(s) of the service
• “I saw and evaluated the patient. Discussed with
resident and agree with resident’s findings and
plan as documented in the resident’s note.”
• “I saw and evaluated the patient. I reviewed the
resident’s note and agree, except that picture is
more consistent with bronchiolitis then asthma.
Will defer steroids.”
Examples of unacceptable documentation
•
•
•
•
•
“Agree with above.”
“Discussed with resident. Agree.”
“Seen and agree.”
“Patient seen and evaluated.”
A legible countersignature or identity alone to
the resident’s note
Teaching physician time based billing
• May only bill for the time the teaching
attending is actually present
• may not count time resident alone was providing
care
• same rules apply to non-employed NP’s, PA’s without
independent billing numbers
Teaching physician procedures
• Only needs to be present for the ‘key’ or ‘critical’
portion of any billable procedure
• for short procedures (<5 minutes) must be at the bedside
for entire procedure
• The determination as to what is the ‘key’ or ‘critical’
portion of the procedure is up to the teaching
physician
• The teaching physician must be immediately
available for the entire procedure
• must be in the unit where the procedure is performed
Medical students
• Are not residents
• even a ‘sub-intern’ may not be utilized as a
resident for documentation and billing purposes
• May only document ROS and PFSH in the
medical record
• May assist with procedures
• teaching physician may not bill for any procedure
exclusively performed by a medical student
Additional documentation
•
•
•
•
•
Your impressions
Differential diagnosis
Re-evaluations
Impression of ancillary test results
Information obtained from sources other than
the primary historian
• Medical care provided prior to patient’s
arrival (EMS)