Teams vs. Groups
Download
Report
Transcript Teams vs. Groups
1
COMMERCE 2BA3
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
Class 5
Groups and Teamwork
Dr. Christa Wilkin
Brain Teasers
2
LANG4UAGE
search
and
I'm
world
thought an
Last Class
3
Content and process theories of motivation
Money and job design as a motivator
THIS CLASS
Groups and teamwork
Agenda
4
Team development
Team structure
Team decision-making
Types of teams
Ultimate Student Chair task
5
CH 7: GROUPS AND TEAMWORK
Question
6
What is your best/worst team experience?
Describe the behaviours of team members/ team as
a whole and what made it so good/bad?
Teams vs. Groups
7
Teams are generally distinguished from groups by:
Team
goals: groups don’t need to have goals
Shared leadership
Shared accountability
Self-developed mission
Continuous problem-solving
Formal vs. Informal
Established
by organizations vs. emerging naturally
E.g., work on project vs. play on softball team
Typical Stages of Team
Development
8
Teams develop through a series of stages over time
Each stage presents the members with a series of
challenges they must master in order to achieve the
next stage
Not all teams go through these stages
9
Individual Task: Put the Stages in
Order
Storming: Conflict often emerges; sorting out roles
and responsibilities is often at issue
Adjourning: Group disperses after achieving goals
Forming: What are we doing here?, what are others
like?, what is our purpose?
Performing: The group devotes its energies toward
task accomplishment
Norming: Norms are agreed on and the group
becomes more cohesive
Punctuated Equilibrium Model
10
How teams with deadlines are affected by first
meetings and crucial midpoint transitions
Phase 1: first meeting to midpoint of existence,
little progress is made
Midpoint Transition: need to move forward is
apparent
Phase 2: decisions and approaches are played
out
Comparing Both Models
11
Team Structure
12
What is the ultimate team size?
Additive Task
Disjunctive Task
Team performance is dependent on the sum of the
performance of individual members
Team performance is dependent on the performance of the
best member
Conjunctive Task
Team performance is limited by the performance of the
poorest member
Team Size
13
As groups become larger, they suffer process losses
Performance
difficulties that result from the problems of
motivating and coordinating larger groups
Diversity in Teams
14
Diverse
teams might take longer to do their forming,
storming and norming
Diverse teams sometimes perform better when the task
requires cognitive, creativity-demanding tasks and
problem solving rather than routine work
Question
15
When will teams perform better than individuals?
Teams vs. Individuals
16
Group members differ in skills and abilities
Some division of labour can occur
Quiz Question
17
One reason for members reporting less satisfaction in
larger groups is
A) individual members can identify less easily with the
success of the group.
B) opportunities for participation increase in larger
groups.
C) people are less inhibited about participating in larger
groups.
D) conflict and dissension are less likely in larger groups.
E) they have more time to develop friendships with other
group members.
Team Norms
18
Acceptable standards of behaviour within a team
Agreed upon by members
Relate to
Performance
e.g.,
how hard to work
Appearance
Social interaction
Allocation of resources
e.g., assignments
Team Roles
19
Positions in a group that have a set of expected
behaviours attached to them
Role ambiguity
Lack of clarity of job goals or methods
Role Conflict
Exists when faced with incompatible role expectations
Something unethical, demands in other roles at home
Both can result in job disatisfaction, stress reactions,
lower commitment, and turnover
Team Cohesiveness
20
The degree to which a group is especially attractive
to its members.
Increase cohesiveness:
Threat:
External threat to the survival of a group
Success: Groups become more cohesive when they
successfully accomplish an important goal
Size: Larger groups have a more difficult time
becoming and staying cohesive
Toughness of initiation: Groups that are tough to get
into tend to be more attractive than those easy to join
Team Cohesiveness
21
Consequences of Cohesiveness
More
participation in group activities
More conformity
More success
In
more cohesive groups, individual performance is similar
Question
22
What is social loafing?
Social Loafing
23
Members exert less effort when working in teams
than working alone
Factors that affect:
Team
size (+)
Team produces single output (e.g., report) (+)
Interestingness of the task (-)
Importance of objective (-)
Value team membership and objectives (-)
How to Manage Social Loafing
24
Discuss expectations
Make individual performance more visible
Specialize
Feeling
not be aware of poor performance
Make tasks more interesting and important
Divide
that inputs are necessary for team success
Increase performance feedback
Might
tasks
tasks based on expertise and preference
Punishment warnings in advance (deter)
Question
25
Why would you want to use groups to make
decisions rather than individuals?
Group Decision Making
26
Groups
or teams can make higher-quality decisions
than individuals
Generate
Increases
more ideas and evaluate them better
decision acceptance and commitment
Disadvantages
27
Time
Conflict
Domination
Groupthink
Groupthink (Teamthink)
28
The capacity for group pressure to damage the
mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral
judgment of decision making groups
Develops because of too much cohesiveness, concern
for approval and isolation of the group
E.g., video of Asch experiment
Video Clip
29
Challenger Disaster
Question
30
Take a moment to think about three concepts from
the lecture that you can apply to your groups
Types of Teams
31
Process-improvement teams
Self-managed teams
e.g., Teams in class
Cross-functional
e.g., Team to improve efficiency of manufacturing a
product
e.g., Team with people from HR, marketing, accounting
Virtual Teams
e.g., Team that spans the globe
Ultimate Student Chair
32
Team Simulation Exercise
Simulating a virtual, cross-functional team with a
very big challenge
Form teams of 5 people
Representing two separate offices of a full-service
consulting company
Ultimate Student Chair
33
Client briefing details on handout
20 minutes to prepare
Each team will have half of its members located on
one side of the room and can only communicate
with them via email.
Five minutes (max) to present your ideas
One or two people per team will present to class
Ultimate Student Chair
34
How was the coordination among team members?
and across offices, specifically?
How did you make decisions?
What did you do well / not so well?
35
QUESTIONS?
Summary
36
Team progress will depend on which stage team is in
Teams are not necessarily more effective than
individuals
Require
management: Establish norms (expectations),
divide up labour/assign roles, build cohesiveness,
manage social loafing
Hopefully Together Everyone Achieves More (TEAM)
For Next Class
37
Read chapter 8 on influence, socialization, and
culture, and chapter 9 on leadership