Scales Of Planning - Regional Studies Association
Download
Report
Transcript Scales Of Planning - Regional Studies Association
RSA Research Network
Governing Metropolitan Regions within a Localist
Agenda
University of Westminster, 21 September 2012
SCALES OF PLANNING
M A R TI N SI M M O N S (TC P A )
Scales of Planning: theme of presentation
• The Regional Scale in England
Greater London
English Regions
Comparisons : Paris, Berlin
Situation in 2012
• The Sub-Regional Scale
Conceptual: functional geographies
Within London
In the wider metropolitan region
Rest of England: move to city-regions
• The Local Authority Scale: Boroughs and Districts
London: 33 LAs make Local Plans, within London Plan context
In wider region: LAs make Local Plans; ‘duty to cooperate’
• Conclude: future of planning for the metropolitan region
Regional Planning in England: Advantage London 1
Devolved Mayoral London continues to have its statutory London Plan
2011 Localism Act leaves London situation intact
Regional Planning system introduced in 2000 being abolished
Regional Spatial Strategies finalised 2007-2009: short life!
Flaws: artificial regions; ‘democratic deficit’;
Central Government influence (housing) and control
Facilitated 2010 Government’s intent to abolish Regionalism in favour of Localism
Abolition includes RSSs in the wider metropolitan region
Regional Planning in England: Advantage London 2
Only administrative London now has ability to bid for strategic
transport and other infrastructure investment
Rest of England’s main growth region loses its voice
Key upcoming issues: housing provision; airport capacity; rail
capacity (commuting); water supply and management; waste
Compare Paris: city related to wider Ile-de-France region
- wide research/evidence-based strategies
Berlin: joint Berlin-Brandenburg state planning regime
functional growth geographies
Sub-Regional Planning in England: towards City-Regions
London: London Plan recognises 5 functional/geographic sub-regions:
Central (growth); East (regeneration); North, West, South (outer London)
Groupings of Boroughs > Sub-Regional Partnerships
Outside London: RSSs included sub-regional policies
based on functional areas or sharing common issues
now: some use in Local Plan preparation (‘duty to cooperate’?)
Local Enterprise Partnerships established, but effectiveness?
In rest of England: move to City-Regions
e.g. Greater Manchester; Greater Leeds... ‘combined authorities’
devolution starting: ‘city deals’ by Government
- transport; economic development
The Local Authority Scale: Boroughs and Districts 1
Contrasting situations in London & the wider metropolitan region
In London 33 LAs – Boroughs – produce Borough Plans within the
strategic
framework of the London Plan
- with which they must ‘generally conform’
An established and stable planning regime.
Outside in the wider region the Boroughs and Districts prepare
Local Plans
With the abolition of RSSs, wider strategic issues rely on
inter-LA cooperation
The Local Authority scale: Boroughs and Districts 2
Localism Act ‘Duty to Cooperate’
expected to include: housing needs assessments; economic
development; infrastructure including delivery
For LAs to decide its scale and extent
Must satisfy Examining Inspector has occurred
but does ‘cooperation’ mean ‘agreement’?
Present indications (early days)
can work in city areas, given political will
uncertain/unclear in more rural areas
- including parts of the south-east outside London
little sign of cooperation across the London boundary
Relating London to the wider Metropolitan Region 1
The big outstanding issue
London boundary set in early 1960s; retained for 2000 Mayoral regime
8 million population within
biggest concentration of UK employment at centre, by far
Wider functional metropolitan region extends for further 50-100 km.
10-14 million population outside;
supplies 15% of London’s workforce
polycentric employment structure, strongest to west
No effective ability to relate together
Relating London to the wider Metropolitan Region 2
Initial need is for a funded research programme
- to define the real extent of the wider functional region
- to assess the key linkages between London and its hinterland:
migration & housing; labour markets and commuting; location of economic
growth; transport, water etc. capacities; environmental challenges and
green belt
Alongside this, work towards a governance regime jointly to
manage new forms of spatial planning
- for London and the wider region as a whole
- at the sub-regional scale, between four quadrants of London
outwards