Good Hopes For Global Outsourcing
Download
Report
Transcript Good Hopes For Global Outsourcing
Good Hopes For
Global Outsourcing
Case Analysis
Global Sourcing
Global sourcing is the procurement of
products or services from foreign suppliers
Global sourcing has become
international business activity.
A firm can outsourc from independent
suppliers, company-owned subsidiaries
and affilates, or a combination of both.
a
major
Drivers of Global Sourcing
1)
Technological advances, particularly
connectivity and broadband availability
Internet
2)
Decrease in transportation and communication
costs
3)
Increased access to information and a rise in
connectivity between suppliers and their
customers
4)
Entrepreneurship and rapid economic changes in
emerging markets.
Characteristics of Global Sourcing
Services are more difficult to outsource than
manufacturing
Difficult to judge quality of services
Need to develop a trusting relationship
Location decision
Eastern Europe, India, China & Latin America
Main motive of outsourcing is to cut costs,
however it often is more costly than planned
International laws do not fully protect
confidentiality of customer information
The Firm: Good Hope Hospitals
Chain of nine hospitals in California
Needs to significantly cut operational
costs. To avoid laying-off workers,
management wants to outsource certain
business processes.
Outsourcing goals:
Reduce labor costs
Allow Good Hope to focus on activities that are
most critical to their value offerings.
Increase organizational efficiency, revenues
and the quality of service offerings.
Background
Good Hope
Wants to outsource data processing for
accounts receivable and accounts payable,
some customer service applications,
transcription of medical records, and some
data processing
Researched the risks of global outsourcing
Consulted with an outsourcing broker
Recommended BangSource, a supplier in India
Claimed that Good Hope would save $1.4 million
annually
25% annual employee turnover rate
Problem #1
Financial costs of outsourcing were higher
than expected
Processing of accounting and other data more
complicated than expected.
BangSource is less efficient in answering
customer inquiries, which resulted in more
telephone time and phone calls to address
customer needs
Fluctuations in the rupee and dollar exchange
rate inflated the cost of BangSource
Problem #2
Outsourcing has decreased customer
satisfaction, putting Good Hope’s
reputation on the line.
Customer complaints about hard-tounderstand accents
Poor infrastructure, partly due to new
contracts
Late in performing promised services due to
shortage of workers.
Alternative #1: Captive Operation in
Mexico
Good Hope would own its offshore facility in Mexico
Criteria for choosing Mexico:
Financial structure of Mexico
Availability and skills of people
Nature of the business environment
Proximity to California
Costs
High initial costs
Bureaucracy and regulation increases with FDI
Higher energy and transportation costs
Quality of infrastructure is low, which will increase
costs.
Alternative #1: Captive Operation in
Mexico
Benefits
Complete control of outsourced activity
Control over reputation, brand equity and customer service
Control of key technologies and processes
Protection of intellectual property
Enhanced customer service for Spanish-speaking customers
Enhanced communication between Head office in California and
outsource facility because Mexico is close to the US, and it is in
the same time zone
Labor costs are low
Access to qualified personnel abroad
Enhanced employee morale and commitment among
employees in Mexico.
Faster corporate growth because outsourcing allows Good Hope
to focus on key activities.
Increase production efficiency, maximize resource utilization
Possibility of access to new markets
Alternative #2: Outsource only
Backoffice Activities to BangSource
Customer service affects reputation and
brand equity, especially in the service
industry.
If customer service is considered an
important key activity it should not be
outsourced.
Alternative #2: Outsource only
Backoffice Activities to BangSource
Costs
Savings will not be as substantial
BangSource lacks quality workers
BangSource has a high turnover rate of skilled employees,
Absence of strong protection of intellectual property in India
Exchange rate fluctuations between the rupee and the dollar
Higher energy and transportation costs
Quality of infrastructure is poor
Conflicts and misunderstandings between Good Hope and
BangSource due to cultural differences
Process of accounting and other data is still complex
Bureaucracy, legalities and regulation is still complex
Alternative #2: Outsource only
Backoffice Activities to BangSource
Benefits
Control of most customer service
activities, which preserves reputation
Faster corporate growth because allows
Good Hope to focus on key activities, such
as customer service.
Sheds unnecessary overhead.
Increases production efficiency
Alternative # 3: Maintaining Status
Quo with an Enhanced Relationship
Outsourcing fails because focal firm and
the supplier do not spend enough time in
the beginning establishing a relationship
and setting boundries
Good Hope needs to collaborate closely
with BangSource in co-development and
co-design activities.
Alternative # 3: Maintaining Status
Quo with an Enhanced Relationship
Costs
Lack of quality workers with adequate
knowledge.
Regulation and bureaucracy is complex, however
by maintaing a close relationship with
BangSource, Good Hope will have an easier time.
Exchange rate fluctuations between rupee and
dollar
Higher energy and transportation costs
Quality of infrastructure is poor, resulting in
electricity blackouts
Alternative # 3: Maintaining Status
Quo with an Enhanced Relationship
Benefits
Less conflicts/misunderstandings
Enhanced employee morale and commitment
among employees
Good Hope will gain negociating power and better
control of the value chain
Faster corporate growth because outsourcing
allows Good Hope to focus on key activities
Productivity and service improvement
Production efficiency due to giving BangService
specialized tasks
Faster responsiveness to evolving customer needs
Shedding unnecessary overhead
Alternative #4: Terminate All
Outsourcing Activities
Costs
Lay off workers, which may lead to eroding employee
morale
Reduction in competitiveness
Cost effieciency reduction
Not focused on key activities
Spending unneccessary overhead
Benefits
Control over value chain
Maintain reputation, brand equity, and customer service
Protection of intellectual property
Good infrastructure
Recommendations
Alternative #1, Captive Operations in Mexico,
Alternative # 3, Maintaining Status Quo with an
Enhanced Relationship,
Risky: May or may not work.
Good Hope and BangSource have different priorities
Alternative #4, Terminate All Outsourcing Activities
preserves reputation and increasing customer service quality
However, increase costs – lay-off some employees.
Better customer service
However costs would increase once again – lay-off employees
Alternative #2, Outsource only Backoffice Activities
to BangSource
Best option.
Reduce costs and preserves customer service
Lay-off some employees This option would preserve customer
service quality and Good Hope’s reputation.