Summary of Global Light-duty Vehicle Fuel Economy or GHG
Download
Report
Transcript Summary of Global Light-duty Vehicle Fuel Economy or GHG
Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle
Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards
Update: August 2011
Overview of Regulation Specifications
Country or
Region
Target
Year
Standard Type
Unadjusted Fleet
Target/Measure
Structure
Targeted Fleet
Test Cycle
U.S./California
(enacted)
2016
Fuel
economy/GHG
34.1 mpg* or 250
gCO2/mi
Footprint-based
corporate avg.
Cars/Light trucks
U.S. combined
U.S.
(Supplemental
Notice of Intent)
2025
Fuel
economy/GHG
49.6 mpg* or 163
gCO2/mi
Footprint-based
corporate avg.
Cars/Light trucks
U.S. combined
Canada (enacted)
2016
GHG
153 (141)*** gCO2/km
Footprint-based
corporate avg.
Cars/Light trucks
U.S. combined
EU (enacted)
EU (proposed)
2015
2020
CO2
130 gCO2/km
95 gCO2/km
Weight-based
corporate average
Cars/SUVs
NEDC
Australia
(voluntary)
2010
CO2
222 gCO2/km
Fleet average
Cars/SUVs/light
commercial
vehicles
NEDC
Japan (enacted)
Japan (proposed)
2015
2020
Fuel economy
16.8 km/L
20.3 km/L
Weight-class based
corporate average
Cars
JC08
China (proposed)
2015
Fuel consumption
7 L/100km
Weight-class based
per vehicle and
corporate average
Cars/SUVs
NEDC
S. Korea
(proposed)
2015
Fuel
economy/GHG
17 km/L or 140
gCO2/km
Weight-based
corporate average
Cars/SUVs
U.S. combined
* Assumes manufacturers fully use A/C credit
** Proposed CAFE standard by NHTSA. It is equivalent to 163g/mi plus CO2 credits for using low-GWP A/C refrigerants.
“** In April 2010, Canada announced a target of 153 g/km for MY2016. Value in brackets is estimated target for MY2016, assuming that during 2008 and 2016 the
fuel efficiency of the LDV fleet in Canada will achieve a 5.5% annual improvement rate (the same as the U.S.). This estimate is used in the accompanying
charts.
Historical fleet CO2 emissions performance and
current or proposed standards
US-LDV
Grams CO2 per kilometer, normalized to NEDC
270
Solid dots and lines: historical performance
Solid dots and dashed lines: enacted targets
Solid dots and dotted lines: proposed targets
Hollow dots and dotted lines: unannounced proposal
250
CaliforniaLDV
Canada-LDV
EU
230
Japan
210
China
S. Korea
190
Australia
170
150
130
China 2020: 117
110
US 2025:107
Japan 2020: 105
90
2000
EU 2020: 95
2005
2010
2015
2020
[1] China's target reflects gasoline fleet scenario. If including other fuel types, the target will be lower.
[2] US and Canada light-duty vehicles include light-commercial vehicles.
2025
Historical fleet fuel economy performance and
current or proposed standards
65
Miles per gallon, normalized to US CAFE test cycle
60
Solid dots and lines: historical performance
Solid dots and dashed lines: enacted targets
Solid dots and dotted lines: proposed targets
Hollow dots and dotted lines: unannounced proposal
EU 2020: 64.8
Japan 2020: 55.1
55
China 2020[1]: 50.1
50
US 2020[2]: 49.6
45
US-LDV
40
California-LDV
Canada-LDV
35
EU
Japan
30
China
S. Korea
25
Australia
20
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
[1] China's target reflects gasoline fleet scenario. If including other fuel types, the target will be higher.
[2] US and Canada light-duty vehicles include light-commercial vehicles.
2025
Historical fleet fuel consumption performance and current or
proposed standards
12
Solid dots and lines: historical performance
Solid dots and dashed lines: enacted targets
Solid dots and dotted lines: proposed targets
Hollow dots and dotted lines: unannounced proposal
11
US-LDV
California-LDV
Liters/100km, normalized to NEDC
Canada-LDV
EU
10
Japan
China
9
S. Korea
Australia
8
7
6
5
China: 5.0
Japan: 4.5
US: 4.6
4
EU: 4.1
3
2000
2005
2010
2015
[1] China's target reflects gasoline fleet scenario. If including other fuel types, the target will be higher.
[2] US and Canada light-duty vehicles include light-commercial vehicles.
2020
2025
Total and annual percentage CO2 reduction with enacted
and proposed targets
Regions are ordered according to their overall improvement/reduction rate.
** Baseline year for each regulatory period is the first year of that period. For example, the US overall reduction rate is 17% for the MY 20122016, and 35% for MY 2017-2025 . One cannot combine 17% and 35% to get the overall reduction rate from 2012 to 2025.
Total and annual percentage fuel economy improvement
with enacted and proposed targets
Regions are ordered according to their overall improvement/reduction rate.
** Baseline year for each regulatory period is the first year of that period. For example, the US overall reduction rate is 15% for the MY 20122016, and 46% for MY 2017-2025 . One cannot combine the two values to get the overall reduction rate from 2012 to 2025.
Four markets absolute and annual rate comparison
EU
Grams CO2 per kilometer, normalized to NEDC
270
US-LDV
Japan
China
250
230
US baseline: 219
210
China baseline: 185
190
1.9%
annually
170
4.7%
annually
China 2015: 167
150
EU baseline: 142
Japan baseline:131
130
2%
annually
3.9%
annually
110
90
2000
2005
2010
Japan 2020: 105
US 2025:107
EU 2020: 95
2015
2020
2025
[1] China's target reflects gasoline fleet scenario. If including other fuel types, the target will be lower.
[2] US and Canada light-duty vehicles include light-commercial vehicles.
[3] Annual rate is calculated using baseline actual performance and target values.
8
Thank you
Washington DC • San Francisco • Brussels
www.theicct.org
+1 202 534 1617
www.twitter.com/TheICCT
9