1. Marco Iacampo - Green Building Credits- City of
Download
Report
Transcript 1. Marco Iacampo - Green Building Credits- City of
The Next Frontier for
TDM
Marco Iacampo, City of Toronto
Green Building Movement
Whole Building Energy
Alternative Commuting Credit (LEED
EB:OM)
Case Study: Exchange Tower, Toronto
New Opportunities
Location
Water
- Demand &
conservation
IEQ
-Occupant
comfort
Energy
- Envelope
- HVAC
Waste &
Materials
- Reduce
- Reuse
- Recycle
Profile
Create
sustainable
communities
$
Cost
Savings
Recruitment/
Retention
Operating Use vs. Transportation
Use
Average Commute Distance
20 km
Average fuel economy
Work days
9 km/liter
235 days/yr
Average fuel consumption per
year
1,030 liters/yr
Transportation – energy use
per employee/year
381 kWh/m2/yr
Operating – energy use per
Employee/year
293 kWh/m2/year
Wilson, Navaro: Environmental Building News
% Transportation exceeds
Operating
137%
30%
Baseline
Green
Building
BOMA BESt/GO GREEN
Canadian standard for sustainability certification – existing
buildings
1 billion square feet of commercial real estate
Toronto Green Standard
Applies to new development in Toronto
R-2000
Technical performance standard for new homes
Leadership in Energy & Environmental
Design (LEED)
Third-party rating system
Internationally recognized benchmarking
Holistic Approach to building performance
Recognizes magnitude of transportation
energy and impacts on human health and
GHG emissions
SUSTAINABLE SITES
Alternative Commuting Transportation
SS
WE
EA
MR
EQ
Credit 4
3 - 15 Points
IO
RP
Building Profile:
130 King St. W, Toronto
Built: 1981
Home of TSX
36 floors of office space
992 parking spaces
1,000,000+ sq. ft
3,030 building occupants
Develop commuter
survey & sampling
approach
Marketing Plan
Methodology &
Quantification Report
Ongoing Commuter
Workplace Program
1. Determine number of Exchange Tower
employees that use sustainable
methods of commuting to work.
2. Understand current commuting
behaviours and travel patterns to inform
a TDM plan.
LEED
SSc4
Formal
Commuter
Program
Occupant
Commuter
Survey
Smart
Commute TMA
module v.2
SCAQMD Rule
2202
Quantify
Compliance
Room for
Improvement?
Retry
Satisfied?
Document
Compliance
COMMUTER SURVEY
Variation of the Smart Commute survey
Online and paper versions
TIMING
‘Typical workweek’ in the Fall 2010
PROMOTIONS & INCENTIVES
Desk drop, lobby posters, media screens, onsite
event
SAMPLING
Random sample of occupants
Established threshold: +/3 pts. 95% confidence
QUALITY CONTROLS
IP restriction to prevent multiple online surveys
Cross-referenced tenant list
Comparison with aggregated data – comparable
properties
Conventional
Commuting
Alternative
Commuting
SOV
Transit
Conventionally
powered
Cycle & walk
Carpool
Telecommute
AWA
BASELINE
Fuel-efficient
vehicle
SURVEY SAMPLE
Q5: How did you commute to work each day last
week?
Drive
Alon
e
Monday
Transit
X
Wednesda
y
X
Friday
Walk
Telework
Taxi
I didn’t commute
(i.e. sick day,
vacation)
X
Tuesday
Thursday
Cycle
X
X
[SUSTAINABLE TRIPS : SOV] – NONTRIPS
RCCT 95%
% RCCT
POINTS
10.00%
3
13.75%
4
17.50%
5
21.25%
6
25.00%
7
31.25%
8
37.50%
9
43.75%
10
50.00%
11
56.25%
12
62.50%
13
68.75%
14
75.00%
15
Methodology &
Protocols Report:
• Letter of
Attestation
• Narrative
description of
survey
implementation
• Results Analysis
• Credit template
First LEED® Gold
Certified building in
Canada in partnership
with TMA
Smart Commute
program:
Carpool Zone Service
Ongoing Employee
Engagement events
Monitoring & Reporting
Proven LEED® program
Recruit new clients
Cost-effective approach
New revenue stream
Secure long-term commitment to
Smart Commute workplace
program