Protecting the Public through Disciplinary Action
Download
Report
Transcript Protecting the Public through Disciplinary Action
Protecting the Public
through Disciplinary
Action
Maryann Alexander, PhD, RN, FAAN
Kathleen Russell, JD, RN
The Board’s Duty Is To
Protect The Public
Not
Punish The Licensee
Criminal Justice System
Punishment does not improve behavior
Emphasis is needed on examining what
happened and how can we prevent you
from doing this again.
Support and resources lessen the chance of
recidivating.
TERCAP Data
Individuals disciplined by their employer
have a much higher chance of being
disciplined by the board of nursing at
sometime in the future
2012
200,000 people die from medical errors a year (Andel, et al, 2012)
More than 130,000 Medicare beneficiaries experienced one or
more adverse events in hospitals in a single month. (HHS, OIG,
2012).
When quality life adjusted years (QALYs) are applied to
patients that die, the errors committed on an annual basis
translates into $1 trillion dollars a year (Andel, et al, 2012)
What does all this mean?
Regulation and health care facilities need to
work together.
We need to effectively prevent errors.
Examine system as well as individual errors.
Punishment may not be the best option for
preventing future errors or poor
performance.
Remediation, counseling, supervision are
tools that need to be considered as part of
disciplinary action.
Punishment
People tend to hide errors
Prevents fixing the system
Risk to patient
Focus is on punishment
Effective when used in the right way.
Questions
When do we take no action?
When do we counsel, remediate and
supervise?
When do we punish/remove from practice?
Just Culture
a system of justice (disciplinary and
enforcement action) that reflects what
we now know of socio-technical
system design, human free will and our
inescapable human fallibility.
The Just Culture Model (simplified)
Human
Error
At-Risk
Behavior
Product of Our Current
System Design and
Behavioral Choices
A Choice: Risk Believed
Insignificant or Justified
Manage through
changes in:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Choices
Processes
Procedures
Training
Design
Environment
Console
© 2012
Manage through:
• Removing incentives
•
•
for at-risk behaviors
Creating incentives
for healthy behaviors
Increasing situational
awareness
Coach
Reckless
Behavior
Conscious Disregard of
Substantial and
Unjustifiable Risk
Manage through:
• Remedial action
• Punitive action
Punish
System versus Individual Errors
© 2012
System Errors
May be due to a deficit in the institution’s
policies and/or procedures
May be due to other providers in the health
care system
Often a combination of factors
Human Error
Human Error
Can happen to high performers with no
history of past error
Discipline may not prevent
Remediation may not be needed
Risk-Taking Behavior
“Justifiable Risk”
Risk-Taking Behavior
May need remediation/counseling
May need discipline/supervision
Reckless
the police.
Reckless
Discipline
Remediation/supervision/counseling/job
transfer
The Just Culture Model (simplified)
Human
Error
At-Risk
Behavior
Product of Our Current
System Design and
Behavioral Choices
A Choice: Risk Believed
Insignificant or Justified
Manage through
changes in:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Choices
Processes
Procedures
Training
Design
Environment
Console
© 2012
Manage through:
• Removing incentives
•
•
for at-risk behaviors
Creating incentives
for healthy behaviors
Increasing situational
awareness
Coach
Reckless
Behavior
Conscious Disregard of
Substantial and
Unjustifiable Risk
Manage through:
• Remedial action
• Punitive action
Punish
The Just Culture Model
A Single Event
Repetitive Events
Repetitive errors – yes,
there is a process
Repetitive at-risk
behaviors – yes, there is
a process
Both may lead to
disciplinary action…
Remediation
Alternative to Discipline Programs
Only effective if the remediation is truly
directed towards preventing future
occurrence.
Monitoring and mentoring.
Institution must be aware and involved.
Deliberate Behavior
Discipline
May warrant permanent revocation of
license
Regulatory Action Pathway
Consistent way of evaluating BON cases
Based on principles of James Reason, Just
Culture, patient safety movement
Transparent
Patient centered
Relies on remediation
Partnership with hospitals
Regulatory Action Pathway
Encourage good choices beginning with
reporting and identification of errors that
might lead to better systems
Identify the difference between errors that
are caused by human fallibility, risk-taking
behaviors and recklessness
Direct discipline according to the type of
error.
Regulatory Action Pathway
Patient centered
Examines intention and distinguishes
between types of errors
Encourages reporting of errors
Encourages partnership between BON and
institution
Emphasis on corrective activities
Accounts for system related issues
Looks at repeated occurrences
Discipline when needed