Rebecca David-Knight, Wales Scrutiny Programme Manager, CfPS

Download Report

Transcript Rebecca David-Knight, Wales Scrutiny Programme Manager, CfPS

Professionalising scrutiny practice –
Tales from Wales
Professor Catherine Farrell
Faculty of Business and Society
University of South Wales
Rebecca David-Knight
Wales Scrutiny Programme Manager
Centre for Public Scrutiny
© University of South Wales
ackground
• Accountability, simplification and collaboration key and consistent
themes in Welsh public service reform since 2010.
• Welsh Government established a Scrutiny Development Fund (SDF) in
2008 to assist innovative practice.
• Independent evaluation of SDF in 2010 identified
that fund demonstrated a good return on investment.
• Welsh Government continued to invest in scrutiny – another SDF until
2015 plus flexible programme of scrutiny support from CfPS.
• In addition, Local Government Wales Measure (2011) sets out a range of
provisions aimed at strengthening scrutiny function.
The vision for scrutiny in
Wales
A stronger focus on outcomes for people not organisations: shifting the perspective
from inputs to delivering results
Enhanced Democratic Accountability and Improved transparency: clarifying different
organisations’ contributions to delivery and improving services from the perspective of
‘experts by experience’;
Innovation: multi-agency scrutiny has identified new insights and solutions e.g..subregional procurement opportunities (Aneurin Bevan LHB, Newport and Caerphilly
Councils);
Greater ‘networked accountability’: Promotion of more efficient working between
auditors, inspectors, regulators, and local scrutiny committees;
Multi-agency scrutiny as a unifying force: helping to address the complex needs of
citizens across different political, organisational and geographical boundaries.
Scrutiny Officer Development Pilot
Project
• In recognition of the limited training opportunities for Welsh
practitioners, Cardiff City Council and University of South Wales
secured funding from Welsh Gov. to develop and deliver a pilot
project for officers during 2013 - 2014.
Project Aim:
To provide the Scrutiny Officer community with pilot bespoke
accredited learning that will assist the delivery of scrutiny in line with
Welsh Government aspirations.
Anticipated benefits
1. Support Scrutiny Officer acquisition of skills and knowledge related to
core topics.
2. Build practical links with Universities and providers about the needs of
scrutiny officers thus fostering a base form which to develop stronger
links.
3. Break down the barriers between L.A.s through working and learning
together.
4. Will create a Wales specific development route for scrutiny officers via
a formal qualification.
5. Develop an understanding of the collaboration agenda via course
content.
6. Improve Scrutiny Officer’s knowledge of participation, engagement
and governance.
What makes up a professional scrutiny
officer? 1/3
Previous research suggested the following three domains:
1. Activities
2. Skills
3. Roles
1. Activities
• Working closely with lay scrutineers and understanding what they
'need‘
• Maintaining good relations with lay scrutineers and those who are
being scrutinised
• Focusing on the strategic, rather than the procedural, aspects of
this work
• Taking responsibility for outputs (usually reports)
What makes up a professional scrutiny
officer? 2/3
2. Core skills: someone who:
• Is able to relate to different people
• Understands what they are supposed to achieve
• Can explain complex information in an accessible manner
• Has a thick skin
• Can solve (potential) tensions between different people
What makes up a professional scrutiny
officer? 3/3
3. Core roles of a public scrutiny officer
• Research - often facilitating or commissioning rather than actually
doing research
• Negotiation and diplomacy - "oiling the wheels“
• Project management
• Relationship-building - most particularly with the committee chair
• Communication - written, oral, communicating complex issues simply
Understanding needs and aspirations of
Welsh scrutiny officers
• National training needs analysis identified need for three modules at
post-graduate level to be developed and delivered by USW (with input
by partners) during 2013/14.
1.
Political Awareness
2.
Understanding and Challenging public service performance
3.
Governance and scrutiny
• Methods of course delivery also evaluated. Preference for residential
element to facilitate collegiate learning environment and high quality
relationships.
• Already demonstrating significant positive impact upon environment,
impact and practice in tandem with other support initiatives.
Early effects
• Increased confidence, sense of identity and provision of mutual
support amongst Welsh scrutiny community.
-
Development of national ‘characteristics of effective scrutiny’
-
More collaborative working – e.g. Gwent Scrutiny Challenge
-
Contribution to national practice guides – e.g. finance scrutiny skills
-
Better quality of formal and informal networking
-
Significant increase in take up of CfPS bespoke consultancy support within
councils
-
Development of improved relations with auditors, inspectors and regulators
• Continued reductions in spending and ‘role overload’ key challenges
to continued development…
Scrutiny in the age of austerity
Opportunities and Challenges
• Commission on Public Services
Creating a culture of Networked
Accountability in Wales
Commission on Public Services Governance and Delivery (2014)
“Organisations must adopt a ‘best practice’ approach to scrutiny, not
a ‘least required’. The scrutiny outcomes and characteristics being
prepared by the CfPS must be developed in discussion with other
public sector organisations.”
• Characteristics ‘endorsed’ in-principle by Welsh Government’s
National Scrutiny Reference Panel - WAO, Estyn, CSSIW
– Better outcomes
– Better decisions
– Better engagement
• Refinement of characteristics planned for Summer 2014.
Conclusions
•
Scrutiny in Wales regarded as important mechanism to strengthen local
democracy and improve service delivery within context of local government
reorganisation and reduced spending.
•
Development of a common performance management framework grounded in
practice - owned and championed by scrutiny officers / non-executive chairs
•
Scrutiny regarded as ultimate invest to save service in helping ensure
alternative delivery models are informed by community intelligence.
•
Significance of resources, training and development recognized in
achieving focus as expectations increase.
•
Increasing professionalization, networking and project management key to
success
scrutiny
Contact details…
www.cfps.org.uk - register on-line:
• E-newsletters, e-digests & scrutiny exchange
• Reviews library, on-line forum, latest news
• New Policy and Skills Briefings
• Download publications
Twitter: @CfPSCymru
Email: [email protected] - Wales Scrutiny
Programme Manager
Tel: 07879443410 (mob) 029 2032 9190 (office)
Contact Details:
Professor Catherine Farrell http://staff.southwales.ac.uk/users/454
Email – [email protected]
Twitter - @catherinefarre
Phone – 01443482954