Transcript Chapter 3
Chapter 3 Teaching with Instructional Software Technology Integration Example: The Alien Rescue® Project Phases 1-2: TPACK & relative advantage Phase 3: Objectives and Assessments Phase 4: Integration Strategies Phase 5: Instructional Environment Phase 6: Evaluate and Revise M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.2 Instructional Software Programs designed specifically to deliver or support one or more kinds of learning activities M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.3 Instructional Software Functions Drill-and-Practice – skill practice Tutorial – information delivery Simulation – demonstration – exploration Instructional Games – skill practice – exploration Problem Solving – skill practice – exploration M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.4 Instructional Roles for Software Today’s software can be difficult to classify Several different activities Overlap of functions in one package – Example: Language learning software might incorporate: • Drill activities (directed strategy) • Problem solving & gaming (constructivist strategy) M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.5 Learning Theory Connections First instructional software reflected behavioral and cognitive learning theories – Some functions (e.g., drill & practice, tutorial) remain focused on directed strategies Later software designed to support a constructivist approach – Some functions (e.g., simulation, games) can be used in either directed or constructivist ways M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.6 Programming Languages as Instructional Software Educational Programming Languages – Instructional software – Tool software Logo – Used to introduce young children to problem solving through programming M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.7 Recent Trends in Software Design and Delivery Online access and components Web 2.0 technologies Rich user experiences Renewed emphasis on directed strategies and networked systems – Integrated learning systems (ILS) M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.8 Drill-and-Practice Types Flash card activity Branching drill Extensive feedback activities Criteria for WellDesigned Programs Control over presentation rate Answer judging Appropriate feedback for correct & incorrect answers M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.9 Drill-and-Practice Benefits Immediate feedback Motivation Saving teacher time Limitations and Problems Perceived misuses Criticism by constructivists M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.10 Drill-and-Practice Integration Strategies Supplement or replace worksheets and homework exercises Prepare for tests Guidelines for Use Set time limits Assign individually Use learning stations M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.11 Tutorials Types Linear tutorial Branching tutorial Criteria for WellDesigned Programs Extensive interactivity Thorough user control Appropriate pedagogy Adequate answerjudging and feedback Appropriate graphics Adequate record keeping M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.12 Tutorials Benefits Immediate feedback Motivation Time savings Self-contained & selfpaced unit of instruction Limitations and Problems Criticism by constructivists Lack of good products Reflect only one instructional approach M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.13 Tutorials Integration Strategies Self-paced reviews Alternative learning strategies Instruction when teachers are unavailable Guidelines for Use Assign individually Use learning stations or individual checkout M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.14 Simulations Types Physical Iterative Procedural Situational Criteria for WellDesigned Programs System fidelity and accuracy Good accompanying documentation to explain system characteristics and uses M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.15 Simulations Benefits Compress time Slow down processes Get students involved Make experimentation safe Make impossible possible Save money and resources Repetition with variations Observation of complex processes Limitations and Problems Accuracy of models Misuse of simulations M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.16 Simulations Integration Strategies Replacement or supplement to: – lab experiments – role-playing – field trips Introducing or clarifying a new topic Fostering exploration & process learning Encouraging cooperation and group work M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.17 Simulations Guidelines for Use Can be equally effective with whole class, small groups, or individuals Particularly good to instigate discussion and collaborative work – Usually considered more appropriate for pairs and small groups M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.18 Instructional Games Characteristics Rules Elements of competition and challenge Amusing or entertaining formats Criteria for WellDesigned Programs Appealing formats and activities Instructional value Reasonable physical dexterity requirements Social, societal, and cultural considerations – Minimal violence/aggression M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.19 Instructional Games Benefits High interest Retention Appeals to students’ desire to complete and play Limitations and Problems Learning versus having fun Confusion of game rules and real-life rules Inefficient learning M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.20 Instructional Games Integration Strategies In place of worksheets and exercises To teach cooperative group working skills As a reward Guidelines for Use Use appropriately Involve all students Emphasize the content-area skills M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.21 Problem Solving Types Content-area skills Content-free skills Criteria for WellDesigned Programs Challenging and interesting formats Clear links to developing specific problem-solving skills or abilities M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.22 Problem Solving Benefits Challenging activities increase interest and motivation Prevents inert knowledge by illustration situations in which skills apply Limitations and Problems Names versus skills Software claims versus effectiveness Possible negative effects of directed instruction Transfer M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.23 Problem Solving Integration Strategies Teach component skills in problemsolving strategies Provide support in solving problems Encourage group problem solving Guidelines for Use Directed teaching – Clearly define skills and the teaching strategy Constructivist approach – Encourage exploration – Provide structure – Vary amount of direction and assistance – Promote reflection – Stress process over correct answers M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.24 Integrated Learning Systems (ILS) Characteristics Networked or online system of instruction Provide complete curricula on a topic Monitor and provide reports on student progress Summarize data by student, class, school Criteria for WellDesigned ILS Good curriculum coverage Good pedagogical strategies Several different report formats Easily read and interpreted reports M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.25 Integrated Learning Systems (ILS) Benefits Provide supplemental educational services required by NCLB Benefits of drill, tutorials, simulations, instructional games, and problem solving— depending on selection Easier to access via network or online Personalized instruction Summary progress data Limitations and Problems Costs Research on impact Concerns about the role of ILS M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.26 Integrated Learning Systems (ILS) Guidelines for Use Clear problem Closed or open system Match scope and sequence Match to target population Adequacy of reporting and management system Cost of hardware and software resources Project educational benefits Obtain ILS updates from vendors Evaluate ILS for match with expectations Calculate personnel and fiscal impact M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.27 Integrated Learning Systems (ILS) Integration Strategies Directed applications – Remediation – Mainstream delivery system Constructivist applications – Resource-rich environments M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.28 Software Reviews Online SREB EvaluTech SuperKids California Learning Resource Network Education World www.evalutech.sreb.org www.superkids.com www.educationworld.com www.clrn.org/home M. D. Roblyer & Aaron H. Doering Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 5/E Copyright ©2010 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.29