Transcript Philosophy of Happiness

+
Philosophy of Happiness
Dr Caroline West
The University of Sydney
+
Two lives
 Life
1
A person is, over a period of time, depressed, despondent,
beset with anxiety, "stressed out”, seething with rage,
overwhelmed by fear, worried sick, heartbroken, grief-stricken,
lonely, in low spirits, burdened with shame, overcome with
boredom, deeply dissatisfied with life, haunted by a sense of
dread or feelings of emptiness, or simply melancholy.
 Life
2
A person is, over a period of time, in high spirits, joyful,
exhilarated, elated, jubilant, carefree, deeply contented, at
peace, delighted with his or her life, or filled with a profound
sense of fulfillment or well-being.
+
What is happiness?

Psychological “happiness”: A non-evaluative term,
used to denote a state of mind—otherwise known as
‘subjective well-being’ (SWB):
 (i)positive affect–the presence of pleasant emotions
such as joy, contentment, and affection;
 (ii)
negative affect– the relative absence of
unpleasant emotions such as fear, anger, anxiety,
and sadness; and
 (iii)
personal judgments about satisfaction
(i.e. comparing what you have to a baseline, what
you “expected yourself to have”).

Taken together, a happy person is someone who is
frequently cheerful, only occasionally sad, and
generally satisfied with his or her life.
+
Etymology of “Happiness”

It its earliest usage, happiness had little to
do with feelings

Formed from the middle-English “hap,”
meaning fortunate or lucky

Happiness depended on how things were
actually turning out for you, quite apart
from your state of mind
+
Lawyers and (Un)Happiness

Lawyers have the highest rate of depression of any occupation—
this despite income and status

Approx. 10% suffer major depressive disorder (MDD): that’s
3.6 times the prevalence in the general employed community;
the rest are merely unhappy
+
Lawyers and (Un)happiness
 Explanation?
 Environmental

long working hours; high pressure/low autonomy;
adversarial nature of legal system (zero sum game)
 Pessimism

factors
- maladaptive everywhere, except law
Reference: Verkuil, Paul R., Seligman, Martin and Kang,
Terry, Countering Lawyer Unhappiness: Pessimism,
Decision Latitude and the Zero-Sum Dilemma (September
2000). Cardozo Law School, Public Law Research Paper No.
19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=241942)
+
What Makes Us Happy?
What the studies say…
 Money
doesn’t buy (much) happiness, once
basic needs are met—nor does youth, beauty,
intelligence or education
 Comparison
 Adaptation
- the ‘hedonic treadmill’
+
What makes us happy?









Genes, which seem to account for 40-60% of happiness level
(setpoint theory)
The company of friends; (friends better than family-variety). This
is true, regardless of gender and temperament.
A good marriage
Rewarding work (but not overwork)
Leisure activities and projects that engage us—even better when
they contribute to a greater good
Decent amounts of sleep and exercise
Religious belief
Meditation (ideally TM)
Gratitude and performing acts of selfless kindness boost
happiness (significantly, but temporarily)
+
What makes us unhappy? (Even
when we don’t realize it…)
 Commuting
 Watching TV
 Background
noise
(e.g. traffic, aircraft)
 Being
alone
+

Cause or correlation?
 Does the law cause, or attract, pessimists?
 Is happiness a cause of success in love and life or a
product of it?

Descriptive or prescriptive?
 Optimists are happier, but deluded. Is it better to be
a deluded optimist or an unhappy realist?
+
Studies also show…





Conservative voters are much happier
Racially homogenous societies are happier
Married couples without children are
astronomically happier than those with
In fact, the happiest people in the world are
conservative, church-going middle-aged male
narcissists in Northern Europe.
What should we make of this!?


It’s a superficial kind of happiness that’s being
measured
There’s more to life than happiness
World Database of Happiness:
http://www1.eur.nl/fsw/happiness/
+
Children and Hedons
As the four separate studies in this graph show, marital
satisfaction decreases dramatically after the birth of the first
child and increases only when the last child leaves home.
12
C. Walker, “Some Variations in Marital Satisfaction,” in
Equalities and Inequalities in Family Life, ed. R. Chester and J.
Peel (London: Academic Press, 1997), 127-39.
Activities
Net Hedonic Value (6-point scale)
Intimate relations
4.7
Socializing
4.2
Relaxing
3.91
Exercising
3.81
Pray/worship/meditate
3.76
Eating
3.75
Watching TV
3.61
Napping
3.27
Preparing Food
3.24
Shopping
3.21
On the Phone
3.10
Computer/email/internet
3.01
Housework
2.96
Taking care of my children
2.95
Working
2.65
Commuting
2.56
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A. Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A.
(2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day
reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776-1780.
13
+
Brave New World
The controller, Mustapha Mond, to the Savage: “The world’s stable now. People are
happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can’t get. They’re
well off; they’re safe; they’re never ill; they’re not afraid of death; they’re
blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they’re plagued with no mothers or
fathers; they’ve got no wives or children, or loves to feel strongly about; they’re
so conditioned they practically can’t help behaving as they ought to behave.
And if anything should go wrong, there’s soma. Which you go and chuck out the
window in the name of liberty, Mr Savage. Liberty!…
The Savage: But I don’t want comfort…I want poetry, I want real danger, I want
freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.
Mustapha Mond: In fact, you’re claiming the right to be unhappy…Not to mention
the right to grow old and ugly and impotent; the right to have syphilis and
cancer; the right to have too little to eat; the right to be lousy; the right to live in
constant apprehension of what may happen tomorrow;…the right to be tortured
by unspeakable pains of every kind.
The Savage (after a long silence): I claim them all.
Mustapha Mond (shrugs shoulders): You’re welcome.
+
Trade-offs

There can be trade-offs between happiness and other goods
e.g. freedom, diversity, reproduction, ambition

There can be trade-offs between different kinds of happiness


Greater income increases life satisfaction, but does not make life
any more pleasant day-to-day

Having children satisfies a major life goal for many, but makes life
much less pleasant day-to-day
In these cases, we must decide: what matters most?
Income and Happiness - Myers
Experienced Wellbeing – Kahneman
and Deaton 2010