Transcript Dr Paul Lee
Ultrasound gel causes
inflammation in subcutaneous
tissue and muscle in Wistar rats
Dr Paul Lee-Archer
Royal Children’s Hospital
Brisbane, Australia
Background
Ultrasound guided procedures are
increasingly being used in anaesthesia
Hollow needles introduce small amounts of
gel into tissues
Ultrasound gel is designed to be topical
only, its safety as an injectable has not
been assessed
This study aimed to determine what effect
ultrasound gel has on subcutaneous tissue
and muscle
Background
Current evidence mainly limited to
case reports of contact dermatitis
Preservatives and stabilisers
implicated in these reactions
Infection/contamination risk
Report of cell lysis in FNA samples
contaminated with gel
Exact composition of gels not always
known
Methods
20 Wistar rats anaesthetised and
injected with Parker Aquasonic 100
sterile ultrasound gel
Two injection sites:
Subcutaneously in chest
Intramuscularly in thigh
Corresponding sites on opposite side
of the body injected with saline to act
as a control
Methods
After seven days the rats were
euthanised, sites examined and tissue
harvested
Slides of the tissue samples were
prepared
The examining pathologist was
blinded as to which samples were
controls
Results
Macroscopically, the ultrasound gel
injection sites developed a hard,
mobile lump and some skin necrosis
Microscopically all the ultrasound gel
samples exhibited a florid
inflammatory reaction
The presence of giant cells suggests a
foreign-body reaction
Results
Fig 1. Site of subcutaneous ultrasound gel injection
exhibiting swelling and skin necrosis seven days after
injection.
Conclusions
Ultrasound gel causes inflammation in
rat tissue
Limitations:
Rat model may not be representative
Relatively large volumes used
Only one brand of ultrasound gel tested
Is there any clinical relevance?
Conclusions
Possible solutions
Avoid injecting through a layer of gel
Use a different medium such as sterile
water
Develop a new ultrasound gel that is safe
to inject
References
1. Belavy D. Regional Anesthesia Needles Can Introduce Ultrasound Gel into Tissues. Anesth Analg. 2010 Sept; 111: 811-812.
2. Ando M, Ansotegui J, Munoz D, Fernandez de Corres L. Allergic contact dermatitis from imidazolidinyl urea in an ultrasonic gel.
Contact Dermatitis 2000; 42: 109-110.
3. Ayadi M, Martin P, Bergoend H. Contact dermatitis to a carotidian
Doppler gel. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 17: 118-119.
4. Eguino P, Sánchez A, Agesta N, Lasa O, Ratón JA, Díaz-Pérez JL. Allergic
contact dermatitis due to propylene glycol and parabens in an ultrasonic gel.
Contact Dermatitis. 2003 May; 48(5): 290.
5. Erdmann SM, Sachs B, Merk HF. Allergic contact dermatitis due to methyldibromoglutaronitrile in Euxyl K 400 in an ultrasonic
gel. Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Jan; 44(1): 39-40.
6. Gebhart M, Stuhlert A, Knopf B. Allergic contact dermatitis due to Euxyl K 400
in an ultrasonic gel. Contact Dermatitis. 1993 Nov; 29(5): 272.
7. Horiguchi Y, Honda T, Fujii S, Matsushima S, Osaki Y. A case of allergic
contact dermatitis from propylene glycol in an ultrasonic gel, sensitized at a
leakage skin injury due to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for
hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 2005 Aug; 44(8): 681-3.
8. Kessler J, Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT. Allergic contact dermatitis caused
by ultrasonic gel. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Sep-Oct; 31(5): 480-1.
9. Khan IJ, Azam NA, Goyal R, Nabi NU. Contact urticaria to ultrasonic gel. Eye
(Lond). 2007 Jul; 21(7): 1016.
10. Leitner B, Hemmer W, Focke M, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Contact dermatitis against ultrasonic gel. Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt.
1999; 47(4): 164-165.
11. Uter W, Schwanitz HJ. Contact dermatitis from propylene glycol in
ECG electrode gel. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 230-231.
12. Villa A, Venegoni M, Tiso B. Cases of contact dermatitis caused by
ultrasonographic gel. J Ultrasound Med. 1998 Aug; 17(8): 530
13. Hutchinson J, Runge W, Mulvey M, Norris G, Yetman M, Valkova N, Villemur R, Lepine F. Burkholderia cepacia Infections
Associated with Intrinsically Contaminated Ultrasound Gel: The Role of Microbial Degradation of Parabens. Infect Control Hosp
Epidemiol. 2004; 25(4): 291-296.
14. Molyneux AJ, Coghill SB. Cell Lysis Due to Ultrasound Gel in Fine Needle Aspirates: An Important New Artefact in Cytology.
Cytopathology. 1994; 5:41–45.
15. Sinha R, Punj J, Pandey R. Use of saline infusion instead of gel for ultrasound-guided (USG) central venous cannulation. Acta
Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2008 May; 52(5): 721.