Online and Computer-based Assessment Tools

Download Report

Transcript Online and Computer-based Assessment Tools

Presented by Jennifer Fager For University of Wisconsin-Superior Enhancement Day 1/19/2011

Advice for Assessing Student Learning in an Online Environment

 Multiple Choice and Short Answer Questions  Not always the best technique in either online or ground formats  Lend themselves to cheating more so in online  Questions, regardless of ground or online, must be written well  The “test” has been overused and relied upon unless the instructor is an expert in writing good test items

Advice continued

 Use multiple forms of assessment  Has corroborating evidence of student achievement  More personalized assessments reduce the likelihood of plagiarism   “Term paper” vs. application paper using personal examples General research paper vs. select topics focus  Use examples more “authentic” in format  Consider problems of the field  Engage in “conversation’s” online

Advice continued

 Security options  Lockdown browser   Student can’t go to another website during the test NOTE: Most students now have multiple devices so they can go to their IPhones, blackberries, laptops, IPads, etc. to research the “answers”

Advice Continued

 Set test time limits  Even if the student gets help, time restricts the amount  Can punish the slower readers/processors  What do you want in terms of meaningful, thoughtful responses

Advice continued

 Assume any online test is, by definition, open book  And perhaps open notes, and open neighbors  Don’t try to make it otherwise

Advice continued

 Quiz/test software products are available  Can generate multiple versions of tests  Each student can receive a “different” test  http://www.fau.edu/irm/instructional/respondus.php

 Have students explain their answers  25% have to explain ‘A’ answers, 25% ‘B’ answers, etc.

Advise continued

 Other security ideas  “thumb” identification  Webcams  Face-to-face testing at a testing center

Online Assessment Resources

     Commercial Assessment Data Management Tools –  E.g. TracDat, WeaveOnline, Chalk & Wire Curriculum Design Tools  E.g. WIDS – link outcomes to Performance Assessment Tasks Survey Instruments  Survey Monkey  Zoomerang Portfolios Course Management Systems Quiz and Analysis Functions  Blackboard and others

Resources Continued

 Google Docs  Jing  Reflective Instruments  Leadership   Personality Style Teamwork  Merlot (has content template builder)  Clickers  AdobeConnect with polling features  Lock-down Browsers for online testing

Fundamental Questions

 What evidence do you have that students achieve your stated learning outcomes?

 How have you articulated these outcomes to students and adjunct faculty?

 In what ways do you analyze and use evidence of student learning?

Assessment Process

 The same process is used for online programs and courses as for ground (traditional):  Needs Assessment   Needs of the profession Needs of the learners  Articulate your expectations  Measure achievement of expectations  Collect and analyze data  Use evidence to improve learning  Assess effectiveness of improvement

Measure Online Learning

 Direct Methods  Mostly the same as ground  Can use any student work products that can be saved in an electronic form  Some challenges exist with lab work, oral performances, etc.

 Indirect Methods  Again, same as ground  Survey response rates are notoriously low

Advantages of Online Assessment

 Artifact collection can be automated through the course management software  Can work for ground as well  Assignments, rubrics can be standardized and mapped to specific competencies/outcomes  Again, can work for ground as well

New Opportunities with Online

 Assess quality of discussions, group work  Particularly effective with asynchronous  Assess individual learning in more depth  Student advising can be more robust  Use of standardized rubrics can result in greater consistency in grading  Particularly effective when combined with periodic instructor norming and use of anchor samples

Discussion & Group Work

 Faculty can isolate and organize contributions to a threaded discussion and give feedback on how to improve  Can archive individual contributions and group discussions  Formative and summative  Course, program, and institutional levels  Create a record of instructor effectiveness  Useful for annual review, tenure

Individual Student Learning

 Individual learning/achievements can be tracked across the educational experience  E-format allows for wide dissemination of collected data  Current software packages provide various levels of data collection & dissemination

Rubrics

 Clear articulation of expectations that are linked to specific course & program outcomes  A means through which correspondence of online & ground rigor can be ensured (alignment)  Increases consistency in grading across sections, courses, programs, even colleges  Holistic vs. Analytic

Example of a Successful Online Assessment Strategy

 Develop course/program maps which articulate learning outcomes and link them to specific courses and course assignments  Collect and archive artifacts through the course management software  Post rubrics through course management software for student and faculty use

Ensure Validity, Reliability

 Tracking inter-rater reliability helps achieve consistency in grading  Post rubrics, anchor samples for 24/7 faculty use  Full-time/core faculty should formulate competencies, achievement standards & interpret results

Sample Assessments

 Review the Video Gaming Assignment included at the end of this packet.

 Determine how this assignment could be adapted for online learning

General Education Outcomes Example

 The ability and inclination to think and make connections across academic disciplines  How would you assess this outcome in ground or online courses?

Websites and Resources

 http://fod.msu.edu/oir/TeachWithTech/online courses.asp

 http://www.uwstout.edu/soe/profdev/assess.cfm

 http://www.fgcu.edu/onlinedesign/index.html

 http://www.pvc.maricopa.edu/~lsche/resources/onlin eteaching .htm

 http://sloanconsortium.org/

Questions and Concerns

 What issues have you encountered when assessing online learning?

 What are your concerns regarding the use of online assessment techniques?

 What policies and/or procedures need to be in place to reduce or alleviate these concerns?

Questions Still Burning?

 What else do you need to know?

The Bottom Line?

 Assessment in online learning can be the same as assessment on ground—artifacts and tools can be the same even if the medium is different!