Patent Pools
Download
Report
Transcript Patent Pools
Econ 522
Economics of Law
Dan Quint
Fall 2012
Lecture 8
Logistics
Second homework due this Thursday
First midterm next Wednesday (Oct 17)
1
Intellectual Property
2
Intellectual Property
patents
copyrights
trademarks
trade secrets
3
Patents: a bit of history
First U.S. patent law passed in 1790
Patents currently last 20 years from date of application
For a patent application to be approved, invention must be:
novel (new)
non-obvious
have practical utility (basically, be commercializable)
Patentholder whose patent has been infringed can sue for
both damages and an injunction against future violations
Patents are property – can be sold or licensed to others
4
Patent breadth
Narrow patents might allow us each to patent own invention
Broad patents might not
“Winner-take-all” race to be first
5
Patent breadth
Does a patent on the “pioneering invention” cover the
application as well?
Can you patent an improvement to an existing product?
6
Patent length
Patent length
Need to last long enough for firms to recover up-front investment…
…But the longer patents last, the longer we have DWL from
monopoly
(Example from textbook: drug price drops from $15 to $1 per pill
when patent expires)
Tradeoff between ex-post inefficiency and ex-ante incentive provision
U.S.: all patents last 20 years
Jeff Bezos (founder of Amazon) once suggested software patents
should last just 3 years
Germany: full-term patents for major inventions, 3 year “petty
patents” for minor ones, annual renewal fees
7
Marginal Revolution (blog):
“Patent Policy on the Back of a Napkin”
“Patent Policy on the Back of a Napkin”
(Marginal Revolution)
Yesterday’s New York Times
“Last year, for the first time,
spending by Apple and Google
on patent lawsuits and unusually
big-dollar patent purchases
exceeded spending on research
and development of new
products”
(“The Patent, Used as a Sword”,
10/7/2012)
8
Do the details matter?
Coase: without transaction costs, initial allocation of rights
irrelevant for efficiency
But transaction costs may be high
Uncertainty on whether a patent is valid
Uncertainty of outcome of research
Many parties
9
Do the details matter?
Coase: without transaction costs, initial allocation of rights
irrelevant for efficiency
But transaction costs may be high
Uncertainty on whether a patent is valid
Uncertainty of outcome of research
Many parties
10
Do the details matter?
Coase: without transaction costs, initial allocation of rights
irrelevant for efficiency
But transaction costs may be high
Uncertainty on whether a patent is valid
Uncertainty of outcome of research
Many parties
11
Alternatives to patents for encouraging
innovation
government purchase of drug patents
prizes
Google $30 million prize for landing a rover on the moon
direct government funding of research
~25% of research spending in U.S. is funded by government
12
patents
copyrights
trademarks
trade secrets
13
Copyright
Property rights over original expressions
writing, music, other artistic creations
Creations like this tend to fit definition of public goods
nonrivalrous
nonexcludable
so private supply would lead to undersupply
Several possible solutions
government subsidies
charitable donations
legal rights to creations – copyrights
14
Copyright
Copyright law less rigid than patent law
Unlike patent law, allows for certain exceptions
Copyrights last much longer than patents
Current U.S. law: copyright expires 70 years after creator’s death
No application process
Copyright law automatically applies to anything you’ve
written/created
Copyrights more narrow than patents
Cover exact text, not general idea
15
Copyright
Retelling of Gone With The Wind, from point of view of a
slave on Scarlett’s plantation, published in 2001
Margaret Mitchell’s estate sued to halt publication
Eventually settled out of court
Was there really any harm?
16
Copyright
Retelling of Gone With The Wind, from point of view of a
slave on Scarlett’s plantation, published in 2001
Margaret Mitchell’s estate sued to halt publication
Eventually settled out of court
Was there really any harm?
17
patents
copyrights
trademarks
trade secrets
18
Trademarks
Reduce confusion over who made a product
Allow companies to build reputation for quality
Don’t expire, unless abandoned
Generic names can’t be trademarked
19
Trademarks – example
WSJ article 9/17/2010: “Lars Johnson Has Goats On His
Roof and a Stable of Lawyers To Prove It”
Restaurant in Sister Bay WI put
goats on roof to attract customers
“The restaurant is one of the topgrossing in Wisconsin, and I’m
sure the goats have helped.”
Suing restaurant in Georgia
“Defendant has willfully continued
to offer food services from
buildings with goats on the roof”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704285104575492650336813506.html
20
Trademark dilution
21
patents
copyrights
trademarks
trade secrets
22
Trade Secrets
Protection against misappropriation
But plaintiff must show…
Valid trade secret
Acquired illegally
Reasonable steps taken to protect it
23
patents
copyrights
trademarks
trade secrets
24
How do you establish, verify,
or give up property rights?
25
When should resources become privately
owned?
We already saw two doctrines for how ownership rights are
determined – First Possession and Tied Ownership
Next question: when should a resource become privately
owned?
Cost of private ownership: owners must take steps to make the
resource excludable – boundary maintenance
Cost of public ownership: congestion and overuse
An economically rational society will privatize a resource at the
point in time where boundary maintenance costs less than the
waste from overuse of the resource.
26
When should resources become privately
owned?
We already saw two doctrines for how ownership rights are
determined – First Possession and Tied Ownership
Next question: when should a resource become privately
owned?
Cost of private ownership: owners must take steps to make the
resource excludable – boundary maintenance
Cost of public ownership: congestion and overuse
An economically rational society will privatize a resource at the
point in time where boundary maintenance costs less than the
waste from overuse of the resource.
(either because congestion got worse…
or because boundary maintenance became cheaper)
27
How do you give up (or lose) property
rights?
Adverse Possession (“squatter’s rights”)
If you occupy someone else’s property for long enough, you
become the legal owner, provided:
1. the occupation was adverse to the owner’s interests, and
2. the owner did not object or take legal action
28
How do you give up (or lose) property
rights?
Adverse Possession (“squatter’s rights”)
If you occupy someone else’s property for long enough, you
become the legal owner, provided:
1. the occupation was adverse to the owner’s interests, and
2. the owner did not object or take legal action
Pro: clear up uncertainty over time; allow land to be put to use
Con: owners must incur monitoring costs to protect property
29
How do you give up (or lose) property
rights?
Adverse Possession (“squatter’s rights”)
If you occupy someone else’s property for long enough, you
become the legal owner, provided:
1. the occupation was adverse to the owner’s interests, and
2. the owner did not object or take legal action
Pro: clear up uncertainty over time; allow land to be put to use
Con: owners must incur monitoring costs to protect property
Estray statutes – laws governing lost and found property
30
Limitations and Exceptions to
Property Rights
31
Private Necessity
Property rights generally protected by injunctive relief,
BUT…
Ploof v. Putnam (Sup. Ct. of Vermont, 1908)
Ploof sailing with family on Lake Champlain, storm came up
Tied up to pier on island owned by Putnam
Putnam’s employee cut the boat loose, Ploof sued
Court sided with Ploof: private necessity is an exception to the
general rule of trespass
In an emergency, OK to violate someone else’s property
rights; still must reimburse them for any damage done 32
Private Necessity
Property rights generally protected by injunctive relief,
BUT…
Ploof v. Putnam (Sup. Ct. of Vermont, 1908)
Ploof sailing with family on Lake Champlain, storm came up
Tied up to pier on island owned by Putnam
Putnam’s employee cut the boat loose, Ploof sued
Court sided with Ploof: private necessity is an exception to the
general rule of trespass
In an emergency, OK to violate someone else’s property
rights; still must reimburse them for any damage done 33
Unbundling
Property: “a bundle of rights”
Can you unbundle them?
Separate them, sell some and keep others
Usually, no
Prohibition on perpetuities
I can’t separate the right to own/live on my land from the right to sell
it or turn it into a golf course
But in some instances, yes…
34
Example of unbundling: Pennsylvania and
coal
Land ownership consisted of
three separable pieces
(“estates”)
Surface estate
Support estate
Mineral estate
35
Unbundling
Free unbundling of property rights generally not allowed
Civil law more restrictive than common law
For efficiency…
In general, efficiency favors more complete property rights
People would only choose to unbundle property when that
increases its value, so we should allow it?
But unbundling might increase transaction costs
Increases uncertainty about rights
May increase number of parties involved in future transactions
36
An example (sort of) of unbundling
source: http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-08-24/news/17934480_1_ebay-auction-crypt-marilyn-monroe
37
Two other ways in which property rights are
limited
The government can take your property
“Eminent domain”
And the government can tell you what to do with it
Regulation
38
Eminent Domain
39
Takings
One role of government: provide public goods
When public goods are privately provided undersupply
Defense, roads and infrastructure, public parks, art, science…
To do this, government needs land
(which might already belong to someone else)
In most countries, government has right of eminent domain
Right to seize private property when the owner doesn’t want to sell
This type of seizure also called a taking
40
Takings
U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment: “…nor shall private
property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.”
Government can only seize private property for public use
And only with just compensation
Consistently interpreted to mean fair market value – what the owner
would likely have been able to sell the property for
41
Takings
Why allow takings?
42
Takings
Why allow takings?
Why these limitations?
why require compensation?
43
Takings
Why allow takings?
Why these limitations?
why require compensation?
$10 MM
$9 MM
$3 MM
$1 MM
44
Takings
Why allow takings?
Why these limitations?
why require compensation?
why only for public use?
45
Takings
Why allow takings?
Why these limitations?
why require compensation?
why only for public use?
The government should only take private property (with
compensation) to provide a public good when transaction
costs preclude purchasing the necessary property
through voluntary negotiations
46
Poletown Neighborhood Council v Detroit
1981: GM was threatening to close Detroit plant
Would cost city 6,000 jobs, millions in tax revenue
City used eminent domain to condemn entire neighborhood
1,000 homeowners and 100 businesses forced to sell
land then used for upgraded plant for GM
city claimed employment and tax revenues were public goods,
which justified use of eminent domain
Mich Sup Ct: “Alleviating unemployment and revitalizing the
economic base of the community” valid public purposes;
“the benefit to a private interest is merely incidental”
Overturned in 2004 ruling (Wayne v Hathcock)
47
More recent case: Kelo v. City of New London
(2005 US Supreme Court)
Posner (Economic Analysis of Law) describes:
…Pfizer had decided to build a large research facility next to a 90acre stretch of downtown and waterfront property in New London.
The city hoped that Pfizer’s presence would attract other businesses
to the neighborhood.
The plaintiffs owned residential properties located on portions of the
90-acre tract…
It might have been impossible to develop those areas… had the
areas remained spotted with houses.
The city… solved the problem by condemning the houses.
It said, “the area was sufficiently distressed to justify a program of
economic rejuvenation.”
Attorney arguing case:
“If jobs and taxes can be a justification for taking someone’s
home or business, then no property in America is safe.”
48
Recent example
of eminent domain
Bruce Ratner owned the Nets from 2004-2011
Bought for $300 MM, sold for less (80% for $200 MM)
This “loss” held up by David Stern as evidence NBA owners were
losing money, players needed to make concessions
Recent Malcolm Gladwell article on Grantland
Ratner didn’t want the Nets – he wanted
development rights to a 22-acre site in Brooklyn
Buying it all up would be difficult
Seizure a la Kelo would be possible, but
politically unpopular
If plans included a basketball stadium, becomes
clear-cut case for eminent domain
Even if Ratner took a “loss” on the team, he got
what he wanted out of the deal
49