Transcript Sensor to C2 Joint Linkages Initiatives and Lessons Learned

UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Concept Development & Experimentation –
Future Joint Operations
Ms. M. R. Shephard
Deputy Director,
Joint Concept Development
& Experimentation
UNCLASSIFIED
1
1
Joint Forces Command Mission
UNCLASSIFIED
The United States Joint Forces Command provides mission-ready
Joint capable forces and supports the development and integration
of Military, Government, and Multinational capabilities to meet the
present and future operational needs
of the Joint Force.
UNCLASSIFIED
2
UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Concept Development and Experimentation
 Addressing DOD’s Most Pressing
Warfighter Challenges
 Focus on clear and precise problem
identification / definition
 Involve key stakeholders, partners, and
transition agents from the beginning
 Identify & evaluate potential solutions
 Rapidly transition successful solutions to
drive change
 Joint Concept Development and
Experimentation Enterprise
 Customers define problem sets, provide
operational context, & help identify solutions
 Partners bring capabilities, technologies,
SMEs and shared experimental objectives
 Executed through a collaborative enterprise
approach
UNCLASSIFIED
3
UNCLASSIFIED
Capstone Concept for Joint Operations
National Security Challenges
Chairman’s vision
• An instrument of national power
• Integrated operations in a complex & uncertain future
• Understand, Arrange, Assess & Rearrange
• Combine & adapt: combat, security, engagement,
and relief and reconstruction
• Create greater balance, adaptability and versatility
•
•
•
•
•
Win Nation’s Wars
Deter Aggression
Develop Cooperative Security
Defend Homeland
Respond to Civil Crises
Joint Force must achieve:
•
•
•
•
Unity of Effort
Joint Synergy
Freedom of Action
Influence over Perceptions
UNCLASSIFIED / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Wargame Structure
CCJO Wargame
Higher Authority Panel
State Competitor
Blue
Red
UNCLASSIFIED
Set in 2020
NCA / NSC COCOMs
Key Risk Areas:
Services
• Changing global nuclear landscape
Interagency
OSD/CJCS
International
• Gain and maintain access
• Integration of 'whole of nation'
Globally
Networked
Fragile State
• Situational understanding
Non-State Actor
• Digital dependence
Blue
Blue
• Battle of the narrative
Red
Red
Results applied to inform QDR and
DoD Decision Making
4
Solutions for the Future Joint Force
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
5
UNCLASSIFIED
Cyberspace Operations Experimentation
• Developed & validated Computer
Network Measures of Performance/
Effectiveness
• Evaluated & refined Cyberspace Ops
Crisis Action Planning Template
• Developed & validated manning model
and estimate for offensive operations
• Based on operational plans
• Approved by JROC, included in FY11-15
GDF Update
• Leveraged experts from NSA, JFCCNW, DoD CIO, Joint Staff, DIA, JTFGNO, COCOMs and Services
• Products providing pre-doctrinal basis for cyberspace operations:
• Cyberspace Operations Crisis Action Planning Template
• Computer Network Attack Measures of Performance and Measures of Effectiveness
Guide
UNCLASSIFIED
6
UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance
Each Experiment planned to build on the previous Experiment driving towards
increased validity for real-world operations
Constructive Simulations
 M&S environment based on real
world processes, capabilities, and
environments
 Measures solutions against a
baseline representing current
persistent surveillance practices
 Runs are executed with varied
combinations of scenarios,
weather, and sensor packages
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)
Live Simulation (EC10)
 Human decision-making
 Premier ISR event for DoD
introduced to further test
 High visibility capstone event
solutions
to demonstrate JIPS solutions
 Builds on Constructive
 JIPS leverages EC10 as a high
Simulation results
fidelity HITL environment
 Solutions carried forward
 Additional solutions which
require human input are
tested
Experimental Rigor is being applied to the JIPS effort to provide a traceable,
logical, and operationally valid path to recommendations
UNCLASSIFIED
7
UNCLASSIFIED
Joint Targeting Proof of Concept
Military Problem: Deficiencies in 1) the availability and placement of sufficiently trained targeting personnel; 2) targeting
automation systems interoperability; 3) the management of the DoD targeting enterprise; 4) and the management of
targeting support prevent the efficient execution of the joint targeting cycle as necessary to meet Joint Force Commander
requirements. [Based on CFWG Study]
• Developed and validated solutions to
deficiencies in joint targeting process
• Cross cutting initiatives to improve
training and education, JFC targeting
support, and automation
• Joint Targeting Support Center (JTSC)
concept
• Leveraged Service, Combat Support
Agency, COCOM, Joint Staff experts
• LOE validated value of centralizing
select joint targeting functions
• VCJCS implemented following recommendations:
• Institutionalization of Cross-Cutting Initiatives (JS/J7)
• Organizational CONOPS (JFCOM)
• Capabilities Based Assessment on organizational and functional solutions in the
CONOPS (STRATCOM)
UNCLASSIFIED
8
UNCLASSIFIED
Comprehensive Approach Experimentation
•
•
•
•
TRANSITION
NSPD-44
DODD 3000.05
SSTRO/HD CS JOC
HSPD-5
• Stability Operations
Coherent Vision
• Security, economic, infrastructure, rule of
law, and governance sector reform
Community of
• Interoperability, collaboration, unity of effort
Interest
ICAF
USG Planning
Framework
JFC
Handbooks
•
•
•
•
Systems integration
Strategic planning and implementation
Knowledge development
Information activities
MPICE
CIP/CIME
Collaboration
Environment
CONOP/Handbk
Development
Architecture
Unified Action
EXPERIMENT/
EVALUATE
SOLUTION ID
PROBLEM
Improving Interagency Integration
Multinational
Interagency
Strategic
Planning Guide
Multinational Experiment 5
Experimentation
Analysis
Refinement
FEB08, Strategic Planning & Shared Assessments MIE
APR08, Cooperative Implementation Planning MIE
JUN08, Comprehensive Approach Seminar
DEC08, Enabling Capabilities-Info Sharing MIE
JOINT AND NATO
DOCTRINE
CONOPs
S/CRS PLANNING
FRAMEWORK
HANDBOOKS
TRAINING
POLICY
Building Toward a “Whole of Government” Approach
UNCLASSIFIED
9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
10