Who pays what? Financing Model for Training

Download Report

Transcript Who pays what? Financing Model for Training

IDB: Transformation: Skills for Productivity, in Chile

Financing Model for Training in Korea

Jisun Chung (June 5, 2014) Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training 1

Educational System of Korea

Age School Year 24 22 18 15 18 16 12 9 VET Sector MOE MOEL (EI) VT VE University Junior College KUT High School Vocational HS Polytechnics VTIs Middle School 12 6 Compulsory Education Elementary School

2

Trajectory of Educational Expansion 90 70 50 30 10 -10 •  Step-by-step attainment of universal education: primary → secondary → higher (tertiary) education

Trow, “Forms and Phases of Higher Education”: Elite(<15%) → Mass(15-50) → Universal(>70%) Elite Mass Universal

1970 1975

Primary

1980 1990

Lower Secondary

1995 2000 2003

Upper Secondary

2010 2012

Tertiary

3

Vocational Training and Ministry of Labor

 Vocational Training Act (1967)  Act on Special Measures for Vocational Training (1976) 

Employment Insurance Act (1995)

 Vocational Training Promotion Act (1999) 

Employment Insurance Scheme

under the authority of the Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL)  Three pillars: 1) Job Skills Development Program 2) Employment Stabilization Program 3) Unemployment Benefits 4

Number of Trainees who underwent Vocational Training during 2 nd (1967~1971) to 7 th (1992~1996) National Economic Development Plans

total

10

In-plant training

5

Number of Participants in Training

- 15 -

26000 ($) 24000

Changes in GDP per Capita since 1960s

26,204 21,529 22000 20000 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 ‘ 60 105 ‘ 65 ‘ 70 ‘ 75 ‘ 80 ‘ 85 ‘ 90 11,471 ‘ 95 ‘ 00 ‘ 05 ‘ 10 ‘11 ‘13 ‘14  1965-1995: 100-times increase in GDP per capita only in 30 years. Drastic development as shown in the graph 7

Classification of the Korean VTIs

Classification Public VTIs Total Sub-Total Public Org.

Local Govern.

Min. of Justice Private VTIs Sub-Total Trg. Corporation WRD Center

Women Resources Development

MOEL Designated Others No.

VTIs/Remarks 2,777 79 40 8 31 KOPO, KUT, KEPAD

(Korea Employment Promotion Agency for the Disabled)

Seoul, Other Provinces Inmates ’ Vocational Competency 2,698 55 51 Non-profit Corporations Women ’ s Vocational Competency 823 1,769 Individual Designated VTIs, KCCI (

Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry)

Companies or Associations, etc.

8

Polytechnics in Korea

• • The KOPO , head quarter of Korea Polytechnics, was separated from HRD Korea that established by MOL, in 1998.

The KOPO is the biggest VT institution in Korea and trains about 20,000 technicians a year and over 85% of graduates are employed at enterprises.

College Graduates High School Graduates Craftsman Residents

enter

Polytechnics

2years graduate 2years Bachelor Deg Associate Deg 1 ~ 2years No Degree 1month ~ 1year

[Training Courses]

No Degree

Engineer Technician Master Craftsman Craftsman

9

Present Status of KOPO

• • Short-term Training Courses : Up-grade, Residents, Inferior, Women, etc Most of Training Dep’t concentrated on Technology Field. 10

Textile-Fashion Campus Korea Polytechnics Seoul-Jeongsu Campus Korea Polytechnics

11

Response of

223 companies Needs of industries for Education 87 75 72 70 68 Practice Field training creativity Curriculum meeting needs Teaching method Experience of staffs 12

Industry & Academia Cooperation

• Companies pay high cost for reeducation of new employees – 20 months, 55,000 US dollars per new employee • To minimize this reeducation cost, companies cooperate for college education - development of curriculum and textbook together, lecture, seminar, field training, internship 13

Polytechnic Colleges Policy

• • • • Specialized Training Policies FL System – Factory Based Learning : Same Training Circumstance as Factory – Training Curriculum based on Job/task Analysis

Extension of Convergence Technology

– Technology combined with other Technology or Human Studies

Strong Relationship with Companies

– Various Affairs based on School-Industry Cooperation – – One Professor connected with Ten Companies Company centered Customized Training 14

Employment Insurance

as financial support mechanism for Training

Employment Insurance

(funding project) was introduced in 1995 by the Ministry of Employment and Labor as a social safety net.

• The EI is a comprehensive labor market policy and a social security system including employment security and vocational skills development programs - aimed at preventing unemployment and promoting employment as well as a traditional unemployment insurance program providing unemployment benefits.

15

Levy-Grant System

• Every company is obligated to pay the imposed training fees o f the employees, and the government pay back when the traini ng implemented.

• Employer, employees and the unemployed are free to provide or receive vocational training, and the EIS Fund grants subsidi es for the training implemented.

• More favorable for large enterprises; The return rates is flexible for the SMEs which are vulnerable in terms of conditions to implement training.

16

Employment Insurance for all workers

 Support for skills development of the employers, employed, job seeker, self-employed  Coverage: All Workplaces - Since October 1998, all workplaces with one or more employee have been subject to the Employment Insurance System.  Companies implement training for the employees autonomously, government induces and encourages the companies to develop human resources needed by supporting financially. 17

Annual Training Budget

18

Prerequisites for Success of EI

• National consensus on the necessity of EI • Financial stability of EI fund is important for overcoming unexpected high unemployment, and unemployment benefit scheme should be designed to guarantee financial stability of EI fund.

• Development of labor market infrastructure is essential for success of EI • Cooperation among related ministries • EI is not a perfect safety net for the unemployed. Complementary systems are necessary.

19

• Building a social consensus on optimal level of contribution rates - Employers ask to lower contribution 20

21