Fisher Tropsch Process
Download
Report
Transcript Fisher Tropsch Process
Constandinos Mitsingas
Overall Process
Syngas Production
Fischer Tropsch Process
Fischer Tropsch Reactors
Chemical Reaction Catalysts
Products
Benefits
Disadvantages
Current Research Areas
60-70% of total cost
Natural gas has 20% CO2, more efficient and
cost effective
Coal, has 50% CO2, more abundant
Input Materials
◦ Coal
◦ Natural Gas
◦ Biomass
Process Chemistry:
Temperature:150-300°C
Formation of methane is unwanted
2𝑛 + 1 𝐻2 + 𝑛𝐶𝑂 → 𝐶𝑛 𝐻(2𝑛+2) + 𝑛𝐻2 𝑂
a. Slurry bubble column reactor; b. Multitubular trickle bed reactor; c. Circulating fluidized bed
reactor; d. Fluidized bed reactor.
Two Most favored reactor types:
◦ Multitubular fixed bed reactor with internal cooling
◦ Slurry bubble column reactor with internal cooling tubes
Transition Metal
◦ Cobalt
Highly active
Feedstock is natural gas
◦ Iron
Suitable for low-hydrogen-content synthesis gases
Lower quality feedstock, coal or biomass
◦ Ruthenium
Very Expensive
Hardly used in FT
◦ Nickel
Favors methane formation
Table 1: Conventions of produced fuel
names and compositions
Table 2: Comparison of FT Diesel with two ASTM
approved Diesels
No Nitrogenous compounds
No Sulfur compounds
Cetane rating (energy stored) 75-90% higher
than that required for petrochemical derived
diesel fuel
Heat removal from the process
Syngas Clean-Up
Catalyst deactivation rate
Change in feedstock
Table 3:Estimate of patents of the major companies active in FischerTropsch
"Fischer–Tropsch Process." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia.
Web. 29 Nov. 2010. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer–
Tropsch_process>.
Boerrigter, H., and A. Van Der Drift. "LARGE-SCALE
PRODUCTION of FISCHER-TROPSCH DIESEL FROM BIOMASS."
(2004). ECN. Web.
"Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center: What Is
Fischer-Tropsch Diesel?" EERE: Alternative Fuels and
Advanced Vehicles Data Center Program Home Page. Web. 29
Nov. 2010.
<http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/emerging_diesel_w
hat_is.html>.