Transcript EIS presentation CYPSPB Jan 2013

Early Intervention & Targeted
Support
‘It’s Everybody’s Business’
Children and Young People’s
Strategic Partnership Board
28th January 2013
Our Key Areas for Impact
are as follows:
Make sure early intervention
makes a difference
Ensure our early intervention and targeted
support approaches are embedded and
have direct impact for children.
Close the gaps and secure
social mobility
Promote the highest aspirations and
ambition for all our children and
young people right across the
partnership, particularly to close gaps
and secure social mobility.
Involve children and
young people and their families
Key Areas for Impact
Ensure we have the best people
working for our children and young
people
Secure and retain a strong, committed
and highly skilled workforce across the
partnership, with outstanding leadership
and management
Promote the effective involvement of
children and young people in their
communities as active citizens; secure
the involvement of children, young
people and parents/ carers in decision
making, service development and
evaluation of services which affect their
lives.
Improving life
chances and
choices
Closing the gaps
Early Intervention
Proactive at
first signs
of trouble
OUTCOMES
!
Using predictive
patterns – go for
the siblings!
Building resilience –
children, young
people and families
able to make the
difference
themselves
No wrong door
Tailored and
creative
approaches
which actually
help
Partnerships and
relationships
which work for
families rather than
for providers
Lewisham Providers
Children’s Centres
Area 1 & 2:
The Children’s Society
Evelyn Children’s
Centre
Amersham Children’s
Centre Annexe
Hatcham Oak
Children’s Centre
Besson Street
Gardens
Ladywell Children’s
Centre
Manor House
Children’s Centre
St Swithun’s
Children’s Centre
Heathside and
Lethbridge Children‘s
Centre
Area 3 & 4:
Pre-School Learning
Alliance
Bellingham
Children’s Centre
Torridon Children’s
Centre
Limelight
Area 1 & 2 Schoolbased Children’s
Centres:
Area 3 & 4 Schoolbased Children’s
Centres:
Clyde Early Childhood
Centre
Beecroft Gardens (Jan
2013)
Downderry
Elliot Bank
Kelvin Grove
Kilmorie
Marvels Lane
Single Centre Provider:
Ackroyd Children’s Centre
Targeted Family Support:
The Social Work Company
Outcomes
To improve outcomes for targeted children,
young people and their families, namely:
Children’s Centres
Targeted Family Support
•
•
•
•
Improved parenting and
attachment
Improved school readiness
Prevention of escalation
Improved Family and Child
Resilience
•
Improved School Participation
and Engagement
•
Prevention and Reduction in
Escalation of Need
Families to target include….
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Families with children with
challenging behaviour
Children of parents with
mental health issues
Children of parents with
substance misuse issues
Children subject to actual
or potential delayed
development due to poor
parenting capacity and/or
non engagement with
universal services
Children with poor
linguistic development
Children in families with
poor school attendance
Children with parents with
learning disabilities
New arrivals with poor
networks
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Children in domestic
violence situations
Children with disabilities
Children with parents who
have disabilities
Families with current or
history of offending
Families with poor
attachment
Lone parents with
vulnerabilities
Families with evidenced
risk of teenage pregnancy
Families experiencing
worklessness
Families with risks of poor
health outcomes
Targeted Families
Estimated Targeted Families in
Lewisham
Projected Children’s Centre Reach for
First Year
Projected Targeted Family Support
Reach for First Year
5,522
Total Projected Reach for First Year
1920 (35%)
*Expectation that this figure will increase as Centres expand provision
and Beecroft Children’s Centre re-opens
1524* (5,522)
396 (400)
The Government’s Troubled Families Programme
The Government estimates that there are 910 Troubled Families in Lewisham 758 of which will be eligible for funding
TFP Breakdown – (08/01/2013)
Crime
17
School
22
220
631
61
73
222*
195
Total number of families
identified:
Number of families meeting
2 or more TFP criteria:
378
Work
* Following the revised definition from DCLG that removed authorised
absences from the definition of persistent absence, this reduced the figure
from 392 to 222.
10
Tracking progress against the
Government’s Troubled Families
Criteria
Troubled
Family
Criteria
Data
source
Demographic
s
Autumn
2011
%
Unauthorised
Absence
Spring
2012
%
Unauthorised
Absence
Summer
2012
%
Unauthorised
Absence
School
Persistent
absence
Son (7)
25.4
35.3
6.1
Work
DWP search
Mother
None
2 Year Old offer
Baby (3)
Family meets two of the
specified criteria
“School”
Improvement in attendance
of Son, which followed an
intervention by AWS and
Children’s Centre
Work
2012
Q2
Work
2012
Q3
Work
2012
Q4
N
N
N
“Work”
Mother identified as
claiming benefits through
DWP search -
Lewisham CAFs and outcomes trend to date (CSC
with EIS from May 2012 onwards)
100%
90%
80%
% CAFs taken in the month
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Apr Jun Sep Dec- Feb- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar09 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 13
Inclusion Service (Ed Psych / Other)
12% 12% 14% 1%
4%
2%
2%
0%
2 year old Free Entitlement
7%
4%
4% 10% 5%
2%
5%
3%
8%
9%
8%
9%
4%
7%
5%
10% 9%
6%
3% 13% 24% 24% 26%
Information / Advice
11% 7% 5%
8%
7% 6%
7% 9% 10% 7% 13% 8%
7% 10% 11% 13% 11% 13% 10% 13% 9% 11% 11% 10% 7% 12% 5% 9%
EIS Other
9%
30% 36% 42% 51% 30% 37% 37% 35%
EIS Advice & Guidance / TAC / TAF & Other Actions
NFA
21% 19% 17% 27% 31% 34% 28% 26% 35% 29% 32% 39% 36% 41% 29% 38% 35% 31% 43% 44% 38% 38% 37% 44% 40% 44% 38% 42%
Linked to Open Referral
14% 19% 12% 14% 11% 14% 16% 16% 12% 12% 17% 8%
Referrals Taken
51% 51% 62% 48% 46% 46% 49% 48% 44% 52% 37% 43% 47% 38% 48% 36% 40% 46% 34% 31% 42% 38% 37% 36% 43% 33% 46% 34% 22% 19% 15% 19% 23% 17% 20% 20%
9% 10% 9% 11% 12% 9% 12% 9% 11% 12% 15% 9% 10% 9% 11% 14% 10% 11% 10% 7% 14% 13% 5% 10%
% CAFs not reaching CSC threshold by need Nov
‘11 – Dec ‘12
Lone parents with vulnerabilities,
6.36%
Families with poor attachment, 6.92%
Other, 8.19%
Families with current or history of
offending, 1.41%
Children subject to actual or potential
delayed development due to poor
parenting capacity and/or non
engagement with universal services.
This is specifically crucial for children
within their early years (0-5). , 5.37%
Families with an older child presenting
vulnerability, 7.34%
Families who are new arrivals to the
UK with poor networks, 0.85%
Children in domestic violence
situations, 16.53%
Families where there is a recognised
risk of poor health outcomes, 6.92%
Families where there is a high and
evidenced risk of teenage conception /
pregnancy, 0.28%
Families where there is a history of
leaving children inappropriately home
alone., 1.55%
Families where one or more
immediate family member is in prison
or has a history of violent offending,
0.28%
Children in families with poor school
attendance, 4.66%
Children of parents who are under 19
years, 1.27%
Children with poor linguistic
development, 1.13%
Children of parents who have
disabilities, 2.82%
Children with disabilities, 0.85%
Children with challenging behaviour,
9.89%
Children of parents with substance
misuse issues, 7.63%
Children of parents with mental health
issues, 9.75%
% CAFs by sending agency type Nov ‘11 – Dec ’12
LBL - Other 0.74%
LBL - Attendance & Welfare
0.55%
Portage 5.17%
Hospital 0.28%
LBL - Housing 0.28%
GP's 0.28%
LBL - Youth Offending
0.18%
Health Visitors 14.39%
Family Nurse Partnership
0.92%
LBL - Youth Service 0.37%
Nursery School 0.83%
District Nurses 0.18%
Other 1.01%
CAMHS 1.38%
Federation 1.38%
College 0.18%
Children's Social Care
1.85%
Children's Centre 3.41%
Academy 5.54%
Primary School 45.20%
Unknown 0.65%
Voluntary Organisation
0.09%
Special School 1.94%
Secondary School 6.83%
PVI Nursery 6.00%
SALT 0.09%
School - Non LBL 0.28%
% CAFs by receiving agency type Nov ‘11 – Dec ‘12
Other 1.20%
Housing 0.09%
MAPP 0.46%
Home Tuition Medical
Programme 0.18%
Home School Education
0.28%
New Woodlands 0.46%
Inclusion service 38.56%
Paediatrician 0.28%
Fair Access Panel 0.37%
SALT 1.11%
Educational Psychology
11.07%
School Nurse 0.09%
Education 0.09%
Drumbeat 0.92%
Sensory Team 0.28%
CWD 0.65%
Social Services 0.09%
CSV 0.09%
Community Service
Volunteers 1.11%
SpLD 3.41%
Targeted Family Support
5.07%
Communications Clinic
3.23%
Children Centres 4.61%
2 Year Early Learning Offer
20.39%
CAHMs 4.15%
Abbey Manor 0.28%
BEST 0.37%
Attendance & Welfare
0.09%
Youth Keyworker Service
1.01%
Challenges…
• Are our estimated numbers of targeted
families right? CC providers need to reach
more targeted families
• More evidence of outcomes needed – tracking
impact
• Increased co-ordination of CAF’s through
logging and E-CAF
• CAF as an assessment tool not just a referral
tool
• Multiple referral forms (eg S&LT/CAMHS)