How to get nhs permission - Newcastle Joint Research Office

Download Report

Transcript How to get nhs permission - Newcastle Joint Research Office

Jill Peacock RM&G Manager
What is NHS Management Permission and why do I need it?
What happens here at NUTH FT?
The risk assessment step-by-step
Where does CSP fit in?
What you can do to help get approval quicker
R&D figures
NHS Management Permission is the approval given by an NHS organisation for the
conduct of research that involves their NHS patients, the patient’s data, tissues or
that organisation’s resources.
Also known as:
•R&D Approval
•NHS Permissions
•NHS R&D Management Permission
•Research Governance Approval
•Ethics & Governance for university projects
As detailed in section 3.10 of the Research Governance Framework 1:
It is the responsibility of organisations providing health or social care in England to be
aware of all research undertaken in their organisation, or involving participants,
organs, tissue or data obtained through the organisation.
This is achieved by the registration of research activity through one central
department (Trust R&D) who coordinate the review and issuing of approval for this
research activity on behalf of the Trust. Many departments are involved in the
granting of NHS Management Permission.
Documents are submitted either electronically to the R&D generic inbox
(Trust.R&[email protected]) or received through CSP.
Project is assigned to a processor.
Processor goes through documents against submission checklist and decides if a
full submission has been received.
If not processor contacts study team to request missing documents and inform
them of the deadline for submission.
Once full submission received R&D confirm that study is going to next R&D
Approvals Committee meeting and processor completes data entry sheet &
projects for agenda spreadsheet.
Research Support Form (V5 March 2011) – this form
Evidence of funding (eg, award letter, details of cost centre etc). Please
note, if your award is being processed through Newcastle University,
evidence of funding will already be available to us in the Joint Research
Office – please ensure you have provided your BH or RES number
A breakdown of costs at this site in addition to any costings spreadsheet
you may have (eg, from the Research Platforms, Industry Costing
Template etc.)
Latest study protocol with version number and date.
Latest Participant Information Sheet and Informed Consent Form with
version number and date.
NHS R&D Form (generated via IRAS and submitted as an XML file AND a
PDF file) – see guidance in IRAS about how to save XML files. This must
be signed or electronically authorised by the chief investigator and
sponsor (plus academic supervisor if a student project)
SSI Form (generated via IRAS and submitted as a PDF file AND XML)
This must be signed or electronically authorised by the investigator at this
CV (2 page) of the main investigator at this site
Study agreement/contract for ALL commercial projects (at least in draft).
This should be the nationally recognised model agreement between the
NHS and industry(see link below) and should include a completed
financial schedule
Favourable opinion from NHS REC
Notice of Acceptance letter from MHRA (if already granted)
Caldicott approval (if already granted)
Other (eg, NIGB, IRMER, ARSAC if required):
Assigned processor drafts risk assessment prior to R&D Approvals Committee
Proposed Clinical Trial Agreements are normally reviewed at this time.
If able to the processor may contact study team to give them pre-warning of what
has been identified as being outstanding
Processor cannot pre-empt all of the committee’s comments
The R&D Approvals Committee meets approximately every fortnight to review
submissions for NHS Management Permission. Committee members include:
•Chair of R&D Approvals Committee OR
•Clinical Director of R&D
•Head of the JRO
•Research Governance Manager
•Representatives from finance, pharmacy, radiology, theatres
•Representative of Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit
•NIHR Operations Manager
•Research Matron
•RM&G Managers and R&D Facilitators
Following the meeting the risk assessment is finalised and issued to the Principal
Investigator (PI), Study Coordinator/Research Nurse and any support department with
approval outstanding. We aim to send this within 1 week of the meeting.
The accompanying email highlights the outstanding items and we chase for these
until everything is resolved.
If an amendment is submitted while the study is undergoing review then this will also
be reviewed.
A risk assessment is performed for every study that goes to committee and looks at:
Finance & Support Departments
Scientific Validity
Study Agreements
Publicity Risk to the Trust
Ethics & Regulatory Approvals
Site Specific Assessment
Monitoring Arrangements
Pharmacy Details
All research projects have to demonstrate financial probity, i.e. there is enough
funding to perform the study. This is especially pertinent for industry-sponsored
studies as the NHS will not financially subsidise commercial research.
Trust finance require a cost for the conduct of the study at NUTH FT and proof of
funding to cover that cost (examples on next slide).
The support departments review studies to ensure that there is staff and capacity to
perform the required assessments. They also confirm that the proposed funds to
cover the cost of these assessments is adequate.
Examples of costings:
• Local costing spreadsheet
• NIHR Industry costing template with accompanying email from PI that this accurately
reflects the costs at NUTH FT
• Blue form for studies where the award is administered through Newcastle University
• Confirmation from Research Team Lead that all costs are covered by NHS Service Support
(for NIHR Portfolio studies)
Examples of proof of funding:
• Clinical Trial Agreement with completed financial appendix
• Grant award letter
• An account number for Own Account studies
• Letter/email from the Clinical Director to confirm the directorate will cover any incidental
All studies are required to demonstrate their scientific validity through a positive peer
review. It is the responsibility of the sponsor to ensure that this is done.
Commercial sponsors usually perform peer review in house; non-commercial studies
with large funders are peer reviewed as part of the funding award process; Newcastle
University academic studies are usually peer reviewed by the University’s Board of
For studies where NUTH FT are sponsor and no other form of scientific review has
been performed, peer review is arranged via Trust R&D. The process is anonymous
so PIs are not informed of who their reviewer is. Reviewers are given 3 weeks to
perform the review before they are chased.
All studies are required to have appropriate insurance and indemnity in place in case
of harm to the participants. Cover is required for 3 distinct areas:
Study Management & Conduct –
cover is the responsibility of the sponsor; if the sponsor is an NHS Organisation then
the NHS Clinical Negligence Scheme provides cover for negligent harm only.
Study Design –
cover is the responsibility of the SUBSTANTIVE employer of the protocol author(s). An
honorary contract does NOT cover protocol design. The same applies for NHS
employees who write protocols as part of an academic qualification. This activity falls
outside of their substantive contract so the relevant academic institution is required
to provide indemnity.
Contracts/Clinical Trial Agreements (CTAg) are required for:
•Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products (CTIMPs)
•All commercially sponsored studies
•Studies where there is a transfer of money or supplies
•Complex studies that don’t fall under the above
It is the responsibility of R&D to negotiate and agree contracts with the sponsor on
behalf of the Trust and all agreements need to be signed by the official Trust signatory
(i.e. they cannot be signed by the PI on behalf of the Trust). Partially executed
agreements must not be requested until feedback is given by R&D.
Standard items that appear in every agreement:
• The legal name & address of the Trust is: The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust of Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, High Heaton, Newcastle upon
Tyne, NE7 7DN.
• Notices to the Trust go to: Amanda Tortice, Head of the Joint Research Office, Level 6
Leazes Wing, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 4LP.
• The official Trust signatory is Mr Steven Reed, Trust Secretary.
• The R&D set-up fee for commercially sponsored studies is £1000 for agreements
that follow the model template and £1500 for agreements with changes/nonstandard agreements
R&D approval cannot be granted until all other approvals are in place and all
approvals are co-dependent on the other being in place for them to be valid.
We require all of the REC correspondence from first opinion
(provisional/conditional/favourable), any responses from the CI to the REC and all
amendment notifications and approvals/acknowledgments from the REC.
We require a copy of the Clinical Trial Authorisation and any subsequent amendment
MHRA Device
We require a copy of the Notice of No Objection and any subsequent amendment
Where a research project involves the collection or transfer of person identifiable
data outside of the organisation the researcher must obtain Caldicott approval. Each
and every research project that is submitted for R&D approval will be requested to
obtain Caldicott approval. If the researcher feels this is not necessary then all queries
are forwarded to the Information Governance Department for final decision.
All research projects that involve persons outside of a patient’s clinical care team
accessing their person identifiable data without seeking their consent will need to
obtain approval from the National Information Governance Board for Health & Social
Care (NIGB).
Applications forms are completed through IRAS with hard copies submitted to the
board. Please note that there are only 2 further meetings in 2012 and applications
for NIGB must be submitted approximately 6 weeks in advance.
The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 (IRMER) apply to studies
utilising ionising radiation (CT scans, x-ray). Each and every site involved in a study
must have had an IRMER review performed by a local radiation expert. Our expert is
still Dr John Kotre. If the local radiation assessment differs significantly to that
performed by the sponsor then the sponsor needs to be made aware as a substantial
amendment to REC may be required.
Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (ARSAC) review
applications for an ARSAC Certificate. ARSAC Certificates are required by law for
studies involving radioactive substances (MUGA scans, bone scans, PET scans)
outside of routine clinical practice. An ARSAC certificate is site specific so if a study is
ran at RVI and FRH two certificates are required. They are valid for 5 years only.
A thorough review of the arrangements is performed for all studies obtaining new or
using existing tissue samples. We look at what is being taken, where it is being
stored, how long it is being stored for and who will have custody of it.
If tissue samples are coming from a bank or going to a bank, a Material Transfer
Agreement (MTA) will be needed. MTAs are arranged between the provider and the
receiver of the tissue and documents the responsibilities for obtaining, processing,
shipment and custody of the samples in line with the Human Tissue Act.
Samples moving from NUTH FT to Newcastle University are covered by an umbrella
Service Level Agreement (SLA) so individual MTAs are not required. In order for a
research project to be registered as being covered by the SLA, the SLA Tissue
Monitoring Form needs to be completed and returned to R&D and the Tissue QA
SLA Monitoring Form
The responsibility for performing the Site Specific Assessment (SSA) transferred from
RECs to Trust R&Ds in April 2009.
SSA is performed as part of the study review by the R&D Approvals Committee. The
Committee assess the suitability of the PI, members of the study team and the
proposed facilities for conducting the study. The Site Specific Information form and PI
CV are used to do this.
Proposed PIs at NUTH FT:
Need to have a substantive or honorary clinical contract with NUTH FT
Have to be of consultant level or equivalent
Have to be a member of a professional healthcare body
The monitoring arrangements for CTIMP studies are reviewed. If the CTIMP is to be
self monitored i.e. the local team will complete monitoring forms and send them back
to the sponsor, this has resource implications for the research team and pharmacy
department which need to be taken into consideration and costed for appropriately.
If the CTIMP is sponsored by NUTH FT it is a standard condition of sponsorship that
the study be managed and monitored by a UKCRC registered Clinical Trials Unit.
If the study utilises remote monitoring i.e. data and Case Report Forms are sent off to
the sponsor, then the team need to be aware that all directly identifiable information
must be removed (hospital number/patient name) and this arrangement must have
received Caldicott approval.
In addition to examining capacity and staffing for performing the study, pharmacy also
look at the IMP management and storage arrangements, blinding arrangements and
the break blind procedure, out of hours requirements and exit strategy.
IMP storage - if the IMP is to be stored outside of pharmacy then a risk assessment
needs to be performed by pharmacy to ensure the storage facility meets regulatory
requirements, e.g. that the temperature of the facility will be monitored and that
reconciliation will be performed correctly.
Exit strategy – will participants have access to the IMP when the study ends and is
this clear. There are frequent issues with sponsors not detailing exit strategies clearly
in Participant Information Sheets. The Trust has been affected in the past with
studies where treatment was withdrawn but the participants were benefitting so the
Trust ended up covering the cost of the treatment regimens.
Once all outstanding items are resolved, the project can go for approval.
The R&D file must be signed off by the Clinical Director of R&D/Chair of the R&D
Approvals Committee and the signatory for the NHS Management Permission letter.
Contracts are sent to the Trust Signatory for sign off while the NHS Management
Permission letter is drafted.
The NHS Management Permission letter is printed and signed off and issued to the
PI, Study Coordinator/Research Nurse, Directorate Manager, Chief Investigator (if not
PI), Trust Finance, Trust Pharmacy (if applicable) and Sponsor’s Representative (if not
This is the ONLY form of NHS Permission/R&D Approval given. If you don’t have this
you don’t have approval and cannot start the study!
The NIHR Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (CSP) is the governance
system for studies applying for adoption to the NIHR Portfolio. Studies applying for
adoption HAVE to obtain their R&D Approval through CSP or the study will be rejected
from the Portfolio.
CSP studies are processed the same as non-CSP studies i.e. they go to committee, a
risk assessment is prepared and outstanding items are resolved prior to approval.
However, we are measured on how quickly we approve our CSP projects against the
30 day national target.
As such, we request that PIs/Trial Coordinators do not electronically authorise and
submit their SSI form to CSP until they are ready to submit to R&D to ensure a fair
and accurate approval time. Please drop the relevant R&D processor a quick email
just to say that it has been submitted.
When making a submission there are a few things you can do to aid the process:
Ensure that there is a local costing and proof of funding for the study and that the
funds are greater than the cost.
If the study requires NIGB approval, IRMER review or ARSAC get these processes
started early.
Clinical Trial Agreements – ensure that the sponsor knows what the standard bits
are particularly fees for commercial sponsors. Also try to obtain an unprotected,
word version of the agreement to ease review.
Encourage the PI to do their part: signing/electronically authorising the SSI form,
signing the PI responsibility documents and answering any queries from the risk
assessment promptly.
NUTH FT topped the NIHR CRN 2011-2012 Activity table with 404 active NIHR
Portfolio studies
(the next Trust had 367)
Number of projects approved*
280 (& 1 rejection)
Number of current active projects
Number of amendments reviewed*
Number of requests for sponsorship reviewed*
Number of audits performed*
* Between 1st April 2011 – 31st March 2012
Head of the Joint Research Office – Amanda Tortice
Research Governance Manager – Susan Ridge
R&D Receptionist/Data Clerk – Richard Joyce
Studies conducted in RVI & Community Services
Research Management & Governance Manager – Sean Scott
R&D Facilitator – to be appointed
Research Secretary – to be appointed
Studies conducted in NCCC, CARU, ICfL, Diabetes & Paediatric Oncology
Research Management & Governance Manager – Andrew Johnston
R&D Facilitator – Manju Agarwal & to be appointed
Research Secretary – Angela Fallows
Studies conducted in FRH & Dental Hospital
Research Management & Governance Manager – Jill Peacock
R&D Facilitator – Jenn Walker
Research Secretary – Mary Crane