Transcript Target value for 12

DEPARTMENT OF RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
Presentation to Ad-hoc Task Force
at 11 am on 21.3.2012 IIFT, New Delhi.
1
OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
Brief description and
background of Department
of Rural Development
RFD of the Department for the
year 2011-12 – experiences and
lessons learnt. What worked and
what did not ?
SECTION 3
Overview of the strategy
and strategic plan of the
department.
SECTION 4
Status of relevant discussions
with Planning Commission
(including with Working Groups)
SECTION 5
RFD of the Department
for the year 2012-13
2
SECTION 1
Brief description and background of
Department of Rural Development
3
Our Vision
Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural India
Our Mission
Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural India through a
multi-pronged strategy for eradication of poverty by
increasing livelihood opportunities, providing social
safety net and developing infrastructure for socio-economic
growth and improvement of quality of life in rural India
4
Programmes of Rural Development…
…aim at Universal
Coverage
…are aimed at
increasing
sustainability
…follow
Participatory
Approach
…are Demand
Driven
…aim at
Empowerment of
the Poor
…have built in
Transparency and
Accountability
5
PROGRAMMES
LIVELIHOODS:
•
Enhancing and improving livelihood security by providing
minimum 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every
financial year to every household. (MGNREGA)
•
Providing livelihood opportunities to BPL
households.(SGSY/NRLM)
INFRASTRUCTURE:
•
All-weather rural connectivity to unconnected rural habitations
and up gradation of existing roads.(PMGSY)
•
Providing basic housing and homestead to BPL
households.(IAY)
•
Providing urban amenities in rapidly urbanizing rural areas and
improve the quality of life.(PURA)
SOCIAL SECURITY:
•
Providing Social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled
persons.(NSAP)
6
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Minister of Rural Development
Shri Jairam Ramesh
MOS(RD-SA)
Shri Sisir Adhikari
MOS(RD-PJ)
Shri Pradeep Jain
MOS(RD-AS)
Ms. Agatha Sangma
SECRETARY (RURAL DEVELOPMENT)
SHRI S. Vijay Kumar
AS & FA
Chief
Controller of
Accounts
Chief
Economic
Adviser
Joint
Secretary
(RL)
(Rural
Livelihoods)
Finance/Budget
Divisions
of
DRD/DLR & Min. of
PR & Min. of DWS
SGSY/NRLM/
DRDA
Div.
Joint
Secretary
(SA)
(Social
Assistance)
1. RH Div.
2. NSAP Div.
3. OL Div.
Joint
Secretary
(RE-I)
Joint
Secretary
(RE-II)
(Rural
Employment)
(Rural
Employment)
MGNREGA
Div.
MGNREGA/
PURA
Div.
Joint Secretary
(A & C)
(Administration &
Coordination)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Joint
Secretary
(RC) & CVO
Adviser
(Statistics)
Economic
Adviser
(Rural
Connectivity)
ADMIN. Div.
1. RC Div.
RFD/Sevottam
2. Vig. Div.
International
3. DG, NRRDA
Coop. Div.
PC Div.
IEC Div.
GC/TRG/Parl. Div
IT Div.
1.
2.
3.
MON. Div.
NLM
V& MC
1. MON./EVALUATION
2. NE Div.
3. P&P Div.
7
RESPONSIBILITY CENTRES
NIRD,
Hyderabad
DEPARTMENT
OF
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
CAPART,
Delhi
NRRDA,
Delhi
8
Implementation Mechanism
Department of Rural Development
- Formulates policies and programmes
- Releases funds
State Governments
- Facilitates implementation
- Monitors Programmes
INDIA
• 35 States/UTs
• 625 Districts
• 6484 Blocks
• 2.5 lakh Village Panchayats
• 15 lakh Rural Habitations
District Administration
- Prepares district perspective plans
- Implements the programmes
Panchayati Raj Institutions
- Plans at the grass root level
- Selects works/beneficiaries and implements
9
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act, 2005
10
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act, 2005
An Act to provide for
the enhancement
of livelihood security of
the households in rural
areas of the country
by providing at least
100 days of legally
guaranteed wage
employment in
every financial year to
every household
whose adults volunteer to
do unskilled manual work
11
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Act (MGNREGA)
Primary:
Supplement employment
opportunities in rural areas
Auxiliary:
Create sustainable livelihoods
through regeneration of
natural resource base – land,
water, forests (“Green Jobs”)
Process outcomes:
Strengthen grass root
democratic processes
12
Impact of MGNREGA
Employment provided to
41m Households (upto Jan. 12)
Increase in Wage Income
Reduction in Distress Migration
Enhanced Food Security
Higher Land Productivity
Increase in Wage Rates
Equal Wages for Men and Women
Improvement in Wage Negotiation Power
Financial Inclusion, 100 million
institutional accounts
Insurance of Wage Earners
Major Safety Net
Annual Budget Rs 31000 crores
13
Supplementing Employment Opportunities
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
(till Jan., 12)
5.49 crore
households
4.10 crores
households
Rs. 257.15 crore
Rs. 140.29
crores
Women 49%
Women 49%
Employment Provided
5.26 crore
households
Persondays Generated
Rs. 283.59 crore
Women 48%
Persondays per household
54 days
47 days
34 days
Average wage per personday
Rs. 90
Rs. 100
Rs.117
Earning per household per year (average)
Rs. 4860
Rs. 4700
Rs. 3978
Rs. 35377.27 cr
Rs. 26800 cr.
50.99 lakh
66.06 lakh
Total Expenditure
Rs. 37905.23 cr
Works taken up
46.17 lakh
14
NRLM (Aajeevika)
15
Promoting sustainable livelihoods
SGSY now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission
(Aajeevika)
16
Enhancing Sustainable Livelihoods
Swaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) now
restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission
(Aajeevika)
Key Features
• Social Mobilisation and Institution Building
• Financial Inclusion
• Livelihoods promotion
• Social Development
• Convergence
17
Social Mobilization and Institution Building
Institutional Architecture
Secondary Level
Federations
Primary level
federation - 10-20
SHGs (relaxation in
difficult areas)
•Support to primary level
federations
•Linkage with departments
•Auditing of groups
•Anchoring community cadre
•Training to SHGs
•Financial and Livelihood
Services
•Access to public services and
entitlements
SHGs one member from
each household, preferably a
woman, organized into a
S.H.G.
To cover 7crore rural
poor households
•Savings
•Internal Lending
•Accessing Credit from Banks
18
Financial Inclusion
• Access to credit is key to come
out of poverty
• Out of Rs.100,000 per family
required, around 90% has to
come from financial institutions.
• Strategic partnerships with
banking sector, NABARD and cooperative banks.
• Promoting financial
intermediation by mature S.H.G
federations
• Interest subsidy on loans to
S.H.Gs
• Micro insurance to cover life,
health and assets
19
Livelihoods Enhancement
• Coping with
vulnerabilities – debt
bondage, food insecurity,
migration, health shocks
• Strengthening existing
livelihoods – agriculture,
livestock, forestry and nontimber forest produce
20
Livelihoods Enhancement (contd…)
Self employment Entrepreneurship development
among local youth to generate insitu employment. Targeting 60
lakhs micro-entrepreneurs by
2017
Skilled wage employment opportunities for youth in growing
sectors of the economy – targeting
1.0 crore youth by 2017
21
Empowerment
22
Outcomes of SGSY/Ajeevika (since inception)
(as on Jan., 2012)
174.79 lakhs
(17.48 million)
120
Series1
100
80
(105.91 lakhs
(10.59 million)
60
40
(42.87 Lakhs)
(4.29 million)
20
0
SHGs Formed
Assisted
Assisted
Beneficiaries
Women
Investment on SGSY/Ajeevika : Rs. 44420
crore on both credit and subsidy
23
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana
(PMGSY)
24
Rural Connectivity
Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)
Provision of all-weather road connectivity to all the
eligible habitations in core network with population
of 500 persons or more in plain areas and 250
persons or more for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V),
Desert Areas (identified in DDP) and 78 selected
Tribal and Backward districts under Integrated
Action Plan (IAP).
Upgradation of selected eligible roads though it is
not central to the programme.
100% financing by Central Govt.
Maintenance by States.
Quality assurance mechanism.
25
Status of Road Network in India
• Total length of road network in India : 32 Lakh km
• National Highways:
65,600 Km
(2%)
• State Highways &
Major District Roads :
• Rural Roads
State Highways
and Major District
National Highways
Roads
2%
14%
:
4,32,000 Km
(14%)
Rural Roads
84%
27 Lakh Km
(84%)
• 80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced
• 3.42 Lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 Lakh rural
habitations lacked all-weather connectivity in the year
2000.
26
PMGSY - Current Implementation Status
A. Physical Progress
Activity
Habitations
(in Nos.)
New Connectivity
(km.)
Upgradation
(km.)
Total Eligible
Projects
Sanctioned
Net 1,58,849
1,14,433
(72%)
82,019
Eligible (52.%)
Sanctioned (72%)
2,55,835
(70%)
2,04,285
Eligible (56.%)
Sanctioned (80%)
3,68,000
1,63,991
(45%)
1,36,972
Eligible (37.22%)
Sanctioned (84%)
Value of project
cleared
Funds
Released
Expenditure
Rs. 1,26,657 Cr.
Rs.96,952 Cr.
(77%)
Rs.88,931Cr.
(92 %)
3,65,094
Completed
upto Jan. 2012
B- Financial Progress
27
Transforming Rural Lives
Increased access to market, health and education
Investment of One Million Rupees enables 165 poor people to move above poverty line
28
Source : IFPRI, Research Report 110, 1999
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
29
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
Financial assistance is provided to rural BPL
houseless households
• Unit assistance Revised w.e.f. 1.4.2010
- Rs. 45,000 for new construction in plain
areas
- Rs. 48,500 for new construction in hilly
areas and IAP Districts and 78 LWE affected
districts.
-In addition, Rs. 20,000 available as credit
under DRI at interest of 4% per annum.
• Allocation to States/Districts
-to States on the basis of 75:25 weightage to
housing shortage and poverty ratio
respectively.
-To districts on the basis of 75:25 weightage
to housing shortage and rural SC/ST
population respectively.
30
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
• Earmarking of Funds
-Sanctions in the name of
women or jointly.
-60% funds for SC/STs.
-15% for minorities.
-3% for persons with disability.
• Selection of Beneficiary
- From Permanent IAY Waitlist
based on BPL list of 2002.
- There are separate lists for
SC/ST & others.
- Lists are displayed publicly.
31
National Social Assistance Programmes
(NSAP)
32
National Social Assistance Programmes
(NSAP)
NSAP at present consists of the following schemes exclusively
for Below Poverty Line (BPL) persons/households:
- Pension schemes for Old, Widow and Disabled
-
National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS) for households on the
death of the primary breadwinner.
33
Pension Schemes under NSAP
-
-
-
Old age pension under Indira Gandhi National Old
Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS)
All BPL persons of 60 years or higher
196.96 lakh persons have been benefitted so far.
Widow Pension under Indira Gandhi National Widow
Pension Scheme (IGNWPS)
All BPL widows of 40-59 years
36.11 lakh widows have been benefitted so far
Disability Pension under Indira Gandhi
National Disability Pension Scheme(IGNDPS)
All BPL persons with severe/ multiple disability of 18-59
years
7.70 lakh disabled persons have been benefitted.
Budget to be enhanced from Rs 6158 Cr in 2011-12 to
Rs 9434.76. Cr (projected requirement) in 2012-13 34
SECTION 2:
RFD 2011-12 :- Experience and Lessons learnt, What worked and What
did not ?
• Third RFD of the Department.
• Total 10 Objectives (including 3 mandatory objectives were taken up with
46 Actions to be attained through 74 Success Indicators.
• Overall achievements – 90% + expected
MGNREGA
•
Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked:
-
The indicator % of rural households provided employment against demand in the
RFD is the appropriate success indicator of the programme.
•
What did not work:
-
Persondays generated and fund utilised were fixed as success indicators.
However, MGNREGA is a demand driven programme and the pesondays
generated and fund utilised do not reflect the success of the programme. The
programme by providing employment guarantee to the rural households has led
to increase in wages in agriculture and other sectors and consequently
household incomes. The demand for MGNREGA work is also closely linked to
good monsoons and availability of other employment options. Therefore these
indicators were not appropriate and have been removed. Other outcome
35
indicators have been added.
Contd…
SGSY (NRLM)
• What worked?
The efforts of the Ministry in providing continuous technical assistance to
the states in setting up of the State missions, and, preparation of their
annual action plans.
• What did not work?
The proposition that all S.H.Gs to be supported under credit cum subsidy
component should pursue common economic activity. This has now been
changed to ’promoting diversified livelihoods of individual members’. The
group becomes a solidarity unit and not a ‘common production unit’.
• What worked, but was not part of the RFD last year?
Large scale proof of concept for sustainable and viable livelihoods of the
poor around key sectors – agriculture. This is being reflected in the RFD of
2012-13. We are also increasing the sectors to include – forest produce,
livestock and fisheries
36
Contd...
PMGSY
What worked and what did not
• “Number of Inspections” as an indicator did not work, since
the objective is to improve quality, therefore a new indicator,
“percentage of ongoing/completed roads graded satisfactory”
being taken for 2012-13.
• Instead of “length of roads constructed ” a better indicator of
“Number of habitations connected” being taken for 2012-13.
37
Contd...
IAY
Experiences & Lessons learnt
• States/Implementing Agencies need to be taken on board for
the success of Results-Framework Document because actual
execution of the programmes is in their hands.
What Worked
– The agreed objectives, success indicators and the target to
measure progress clearly indicated in RFD have made it
easier to understand how to effectively implement and
monitor the scheme.
What did not work
– Non-inclusion of Management Information System (MIS) to
monitor the programmes to have comprehensive data input
about programme implementation.
38
Contd...
PURA
Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked and What not ?
• Since PURA is being tried out on pilot basis, proper
assessment of the time needed to complete the processes
involved could not be done. This rendered the timelines
unrealistic.
NSAP – Experiences & Lessons learnt
• Key improvement – better coverage of eligible beneficiaries.
39
Section 3:
Overview of the Strategy and Strategic
Plan of the Department
MGNREGA
• Focusing on labour intensive land development works on community lands
and land belonging to marginalized sections.
• Use of ICT to improve delivery of services and enhance transparency and
accountability.
SGSY (NRLM)
• Emphasis on setting up of dedicated state missions, staffed with quality
human resources, continuous capacity building of the missions and state
developing their own poverty reduction action plans.
• Phasing strategy to ensure capacities are built at all levels and scaling up
happens in a seamless organic manner
• Establishing large scale proof of concepts in all critical components, to
draw lessons for scaling up – resource blocks, primary sector livelihoods,
financial inclusion pilots, self employment pilots, social inclusion pilots,
40
etc.
Contd…
•
•
•
•
PMGSY
Proper planning through preparation of Core-Network and
web-based monitoring and management
High technical standards for design and execution and
capacity creation for the purpose
Emphasis on quality
Proper maintenance of assets to ensure sustained socioeconomic dividends
41
Contd…
IAY
• Ensure adequate and affordable housing for all and facilitate
development of sustainable and inclusive habitats in rural
areas by expanding Government support, promoting
community participation, self-help and public-private
partnership within the framework of Panchayati Raj.
• Provide access to land, finance, basic amenities and technical
support for the construction of the houses.
• Creation of web based knowledge network of appropriate
technology for specific region/areas of the country for IAY
houses with an aim to create a knowledge repository.
• Set up Resources Centres at Centre for handling technical,
financial & research needs for Rural Housing Habitats and set
up similar Centres at States.
42
Contd…
PURA
• PPP mode to achieve efficient implementation of Rural
Infrastructure projects and high standards of service delivery.
• Convergence of several schemes and simultaneous
implementation in a project mode.
NSAP
• To build a database of beneficiaries with Unique ID number
• Open accounts in Banks for all beneficiaries as far as possible.
• Disbursement of benefits under NSAP through transaction
based NSAP-MIS.
43
Section 4
Discussion with Planning Commission
(including Working Groups)
MGNREGA
- The working group has recommended strengthening the
institutional arrangement at all levels for better
implementation of MGNREGA. This includes cluster level
teams in high expenditure Blocks. The working group has also
accorded priority to capacity building efforts. These
recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in
2012-13.
- Use of modern technology including ICT for timely
disbursement of benefits.
44
Contd…
SGSY (NRLM)
• Emphasis on capacity building of State, district and Sub—district
Mission units.
• Placement linked skill development to be a major initiative in 12th
Plan
• Sustainable livelihoods initiatives in agriculture, forest produce (nontimber), livestock, fisheries, etc.
• Financial inclusion to be major thrust area for savings and credit
• Special initiatives for social inclusion of weaker sections and
vulnerable categories.
45
Contd…
PMGSY:
• Working Group has recommended striking of balance between maintenance
and creation of assets.
• Working Group has recommended more emphasis on providing connectivity to
IAP Districts.
• Working Group has recommended intensification of efforts to use
marginal/local materials in road construction.
IAY (Rural Housing):
• Working Group has recommended enhancement in unit assistance for the
construction of houses .
• Provision for capacity building and man-power strengthening to make MIS
successful recommended.
• New ways to implement new financial instruments/bankable schemes
to be investigated.
• Provision of technical training and technical support to the ground level
officials and beneficiaries respectively.
46
Contd…
PURA
 The working group has recommended a larger role for the State
Governments in the appraisal and approval of PURA projects and
also conversion of the scheme into a centrally sponsored scheme.
This will enhance the commitment of the States to the scheme.
 The working group has also recommended establishment of
adequate institutional arrangement for project implementation.
These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in
2012-13.
NSAP
• No working group
47
RFD 2012-13
Inter se priorities among key objectives,
success indicators and targets
Table 1- Result-Framework Document (RFD)
Table 2- Trend Value for Success Indicators
48
Section 2
Table 1 – Result Framework Document
Objective
Weight
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 1
15
1.1 % of
households
provided
employment
against
demanded
employment
under
MGNREGS
% of rural
households
2.00
98
1.2 Person days
generated under
MGNREGS
(women)
% of persondays
(women) generated
2.00
33
49
Contd…
Objective
Weight Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 1
15
1.3 Approval of
State Labour
Budget for 201213
Approval of Labour
budget of States
2.00
28
1.4 Review by
Central
Employment
Guarantee
Council
No. of meetings
held
2.00
2
1.5 Regional
Review
meetings in 6
Regions.
No. of meetings
1.00
12
1.6 Monitoring of
MGNREGA
process and
quality of works
No. of district for
NLM visit
1.00
100
50
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 1
15
1.7 MIS
reporting of
expenditure
% of expenditure
reported on MIS
2.00
90
1.8 Capacity
building for
enhancing
effectiveness of
Gram Sabha
No. of Gram
Panchayat for
training
1.00
100
1.9 Pilot e-FMS
solution in
States
Number of States
initiated e-FMS
1.00
6
1.10 Pilot social
audit in States
Number of States
piloted social audit.
1.00
20
51
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Objective 2
15
Actions
Success Indicators
2.1 State Missions for Number of new State
NRLM Implementation missions set up
2.2 District
Programme
Management Unit set
up for NRLM
Implementation
2.3 Block Programme
Management Unit set
up for NRLM
implementation
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
1.00
7
No. of new District
1.00
Programme Management
Unit Set up
58
No. of new Block
1.00
Programme Management
Unit Set up
144
2.4 Formation of Self No. of SHGs formed (in
Help Groups (SHGs) lakhs)
2.00
2.88
52
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Objective 2
15
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
2.5 Capacity
Number beneficiaries
Building and Training provided training (in
of beneficiaries
lakhs)
2.00
5.47
2.6 Provision of
economic support
(credit and Subsidy)
to SHGs for
livelihood promotion
2.7 Promoting
Sustainable
Livelihoods- large
sized proof of
concepts
Number of SHGs
assisted (in lakhs)
2.00
1.74
No of key livelihood
sectors where proof of
concepts has been
established
1.00
2
53
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Objective 2
15
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
2.8 Sustainable
livelihoods Pilots families benefited
No of beneficiaries
2.00
intervened by livelihood
interventions (in lakhs)
9.60
2.9 Sanction of
Placement linked
skill development
projects through
private sector
participation
2.10 Number of
micro enterprises
created through
RSETI and
partnership
organisations
Number of beneficiaries 2.00
trained and placed (in
lakhs)
3.84
Number of beneficiaries 1.00
trained (in lakhs)
0.96
54
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 3
15
3.1 Habitations
– Habitations to
be connected
Connection of
habitations
4.00
4,000
3.2 Satisfactory
Quality of roads
under
construction.
% of “satisfactory
grading”
2.00
70
3.3 Satisfactory
Quality of roads
completed.
% of “satisfactory
grading”
2.00
75
3.4 Data Entry
on OMMAS reg.
road length
sanctioned.
% of data entry on
OMMAS
1.00
90
55
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Actions
Success Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 3
15
3.5 Data Entry on
OMMAS reg.
value of projects
sanctioned
% of data entry on
OMMAS
1.00
90
3.6 Data Entry on
OMMAS reg.
habitations
sanctioned
% of data entry on
OMMAS
1.00
90
3.7 Maintenance
Funds credited
Funds credited (%)
1.00
80
3.8 Maintenance
Funds expenditure
Expenditure (% of
deposit)
1.00
60
3.9 Regional
Review Meetings
No. of review
meetings
1.00
12
3.10 Improving the
capacity of
NRRDA
Implementation of
McKinsey Report
1.00
9
56
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Actions
Objective 4
15
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
4.1 Develop
Active
MIS architecture convergence with
States
3.00
18
4.2 Fulfilment of
physical target
for the year
Construction of
houses
6.00
17.30
4.3 Focus on
weaker sections
No. of houses (in
lakhs)
3.00
10.38
4.4 Monitoring of
performance of
States
Effective Monitoring
by way of monthly
meetings of
coordinating offices,
quarterly meetings of
Secretaries and
annual meetings of
PDs, DRDAs etc.
3.00
10
57
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 5
10
5.1 Scrutiny of
proposals for
release of funds
Release of funds
to the States (in
lakhs)
2.00
9434.76
5.2 Identification
of eligible
beneficiaries for
Pension
Schemes for the
aged, widows
and the disabled
Coverage of
beneficiaries vis-àvis the estimated
number (in lakhs)
3.00
315
5.3 Identification
of eligible
households for
assistance
under NFBS.
Coverage of
3.00
eligible households
vis-à-vis the
estimated
numbers (in lakhs)
3.43
58
Contd….
Objective
Weight
Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 5
10
5.4 Placing the
database of
pensioners in
the public
domain under
MIS
Uploading of
2.00
pensisoners
database vis-à-vis
the physical
coverage (in lakhs)
170
Objective 6
5
6.1 Rolling out
of remaining 7
pilot projects of
PURA
Approval of DPRs
and release of
funds to DRDAs
0.5
31.10.12
6.2 Execution of
State support
agreement and
concession
agreement
Signing of
Agreements
0.5
30.11.12
59
Contd…
Objective
Objective 6
Weight
5
Actions
Success Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
6.3 Commencement of
activities
Inventorisation of
assets, procurement of
land, release of grant
instalment, financial
closure and
dissemination of project
documents
0.5
31.12.12
6.4 Selected private
developers to provide
urban amenities in
PURA clusters,
drinking water and
sewage treatment,
construction of village
streets, drainage, solid
waste management,
skill development of
rural BPL youths etc.
Approval of DPRs and
release of funds to
DRDAs
0.5
31.10.12
60
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 6
6.5 Revision of
PURA
guidelines
based on
learning so far
in the pilot
phase
Incorporating
modifications in
consultations with
connected
Ministries for
effective
implementation
0.5
31.12.15
6.6 Calling for
Expression of
Interest (EOI)
for the next set
of pilot projects
After revising the
guidelines,
finalization and
advertising of EOI
document.
0.5
31.10.12
6.7 Evaluation of
EOIs and short
listing to select
capable Private
developers
Scrutiny of EOIs
received and
shortlisting
1.00
30.9.12
5
61
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 6
5
6.8 Calling for
Request for
proposals (RFP)
from short listed
private
developers
Finalization of RFP 1.00
document and its
publication in
newspapers
30.11.12
Objective 7
5
7.1 Improving
service delivery
of NIRD
Implementation of
recommendation
of Committee
2.00
30.11.12
7.2 Organisation Number of
of Training
Trainings
Courses
conducted
2.00
23,000
7.3 Organisation April, 12, June, 12,
of five national
August 12, Nov.,
Colloquia of
12 and Jan., 13
SIRDs and
ETCs
1.00
5
62
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Success
Indicators
Weight
Target
Value
(100%)
Objective 8
8.1 Finalization /
Preparation of
final reform
proposal
Preparation of
Detailed target
oriented action
plan for
implementation
3.00
April, 12
8.2
Implementation
of Action Plan
Engaging
Implementation
agent
2.00
June, 12
5
63
Section 3
Table 2 – Trend value for Success Indicators
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 1
1.1 % of
households
provided
employment
against
demanded
employment
under
MGNREGS
%
99
99
99
1.2 Person
days
generated
under
MGNREGS
(women)
%
48
49
33
15
64
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 1
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
1.3 Approval
Nos.
of State
Labour Budget
for 2012-13
28
28
28
1.4 Review by
Central
Employment
Guarantee
Council
Nos.
3
2
3
1.5 Regional
Review
meetings in 6
Regions.
Nos.
2
1
12
65
Contd…
Objective
Weight
Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value for
FY 11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 1
15
1.6 Monitoring
of MGNREGA
process and
quality of works
Nos.
-
-
100
1.7 MIS
reporting of
expenditure
%
-
85
90
1.8 Capacity
building for
enhancing
effectriveness of
Gram Sabha
Nos. of
GP
-
-
100
66
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 1
1.9 Pilot eFMS solution
in States
Nos.
-
-
6
1.10 Pilot
social audit in
States
2.1 State
Missions for
NRLM
Implementation
Nos.
-
-
5
20
8
Objective 2
15
15
Number of new State
missions
set up
67
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 2
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
2.2 District
Programme
Management Unit
set up for NRLM
Implementation
No. of new
District
Programme
Management
Unit Set up
-
60
2.3 Block
Programme
Management Unit
set up for NRLM
implementation
No. of new
Block
Programme
Management
Unit Set up
-
150
3.00
3.00
2.4 Formation of No. of SHGs 2.85
Self Help Groups formed (in
(SHGs)
lakhs)
68
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 2
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
2.5 Capacity Building Number
and Training of
beneficiaries
beneficiaries
provided
training (in
lakhs)
27.45
19.00
5.70
2.6 Provision of
economic support
(credit and Subsidy)
to SHGs for
livelihood promotion
2.7 Promoting
Sustainable
Livelihoods- large
sized proof of
concepts
3.86
2.00
1.78
-
3.00
Number of
SHGs
assisted (in
lakhs)
No of key
livelihood
sectors where
proof of
concepts has
been
established
69
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 2
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
2.8 Sustainable
livelihoods Pilots families benefited
No of
beneficiaries
intervened by
livelihood
interventions
(in lakhs)
-
-
10.00
2.9 Sanction of
Placement linked skill
development projects
through private sector
participation
2.10 Number of micro
enterprises created
through RSETI and
partnership
organisations
Number of
beneficiaries
trained and
placed (in
lakhs)
Number of
beneficiaries
trained (in
lakhs)
0.85
3.75
4.00
-
-
1.00
70
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 3
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
3.1 Habitations –
Habitations to be
connected
Nos
7584
4000
4000
3.2
Satisfactory
Quality of
roads under
construction.
% of
“satisfac
tory
grading”
-
-
70
3.3
Satisfactory
Quality of
roads
completed.
% of
“satisfac
tory
grading”
-
-
75
71
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 3
3.4 Data Entry
on OMMAS
reg. road
length
sanctioned.
% of
data
entry on
OMMAS
70
80
80
3.5 Data Entry
on OMMAS reg.
value of projects
sanctioned
% of data
entry on
OMMAS
-
60
80
15
72
Contd….
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 3
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
3.6 Data Entry
on OMMAS reg.
habitations
sanctioned
% of data
entry on
OMMAS
-
-
80
3.7 Maintenance
Funds credited
Funds
credited
(%)
-
-
70
3.8 Maintenance
Funds
expenditure
Expenditu
re (% of
deposit)
-
-
50
73
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 3
15
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
3.9 Regional
Review
Meetings
No. of
review
meetings
-
-
12
3.10 Improving
the capacity of
NRRDA
Implemen
tation of
McKinsey
Report
-
-
9
74
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 4
4.1 Develop
MIS
architecture
No. of
States
-
-
18
4.2 Fulfilment
of physical
target for the
year
Nos. of
houses
(In lakhs)
29.09
27.26
17.30
4.3 Focus on
weaker
sections
-do-
17.45
16.87
10.38
4.4 Monitoring
of
performance
of States
No. of
meetings
10
10
10
15
75
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 5
5.1 Scrutiny of
proposals for
release of
funds
Rs. in
crores
5110
6658
9434.76
5.2
Identification
of eligible
beneficiaries
for Pension
Schemes for
the aged,
widows and
the disabled
No. in
lakhs
215
226
315
10
76
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 5
10
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
No. in
5.3
lakhs
Identification
of eligible
households for
assistance
under NFBS.
2.05
3.43
3.43
No. in
lakhs
164
170
170
5.4 Placing
the database
of pensioners
in the public
domain under
MIS.
Unit
77
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 6
Time
period
-
-
31.10.12
-
-
30.11.12
5
6.1 Rolling out
of remaining 7
pilot projects
of PURA
6.2 Execution
of State
support
agreement
and
concession
agreement
78
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 6
5
6.3
Commencement
of activities
6.4 Selected
private developers
to provide urban
amenities in PURA
clusters, drinking
water and sewage
treatment,
construction of
village streets,
drainage, solid
waste
management, skill
development of
rural BPL youths
etc.
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Time
period
-
-
31.12.12
-
-
-
79
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 6
Time
period
-
-
31.5.12
-
-
31.7.12
6
6.5 Revision
of PURA
guidelines
based on
learning so far
in the pilot
phase
6.6 Calling for
Expression of
Interest (EOI)
for the next
set of pilot
projects
80
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Objective
6
6.7 Evaluation
of EOIs and
short listing to
select capable
Private
developers
6.8 Calling for
Request for
proposals
(RFP) from
short listed
private
developers
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Time
period
-
-
30.9.12
-
-
30.11.12
81
Contd…
Objective Weight Actions
Unit
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
Objective 7
7.1 Improving
service
delivery of
NIRD
Time
period
-
-
30.11.12
7.2
Organisation
of Training
Courses
Nos.
41030
13144
23000
7.3
Organisation
of five national
Colloquia of
SIRDs and
ETCs
Nos.
2
5
5
5
82
Contd….
Objective Weight Actions
Objective 8
5
Unit
8.1 Finalization / Time
Preparation of
period
final reform
proposal
8.2
Implementation
of Action Plan
Nos.
Actual
Value
for FY
10-11
Actual
Value
for FY
11-12
(prov.)
Target
value
for 1213
-
-
April, 12
June,
2012
83
Description of Success indicators and
measurement methodology
Schemes of DoRD are Centrally Sponsored Schemes
that are implemented through:(i) State Governments
(ii) Autonomous societies under State Governments
(iii) District Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs).
Role of Union Government (DoRD):
(i) Issue guidelines of schemes/ programmes.
(ii) Provide financial assistance.
(iii) Periodically monitor progress of the secheme.
(iv) Evaluate the impact of the schemes.
The various success indicators have been prescribed
accordingly.
84
Description of Success indicators and
measurement methodology
MGNREGA
I.
II.
Wage income provided per household.
Coverage of marginalized groups
• Percentage of SC participation.
• Percentage of ST participation
• Percentage of women participation.
SGSY:
1. No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up
No. of SHGs formed
No. of beneficiaries provided training
No. of SHGs assisted
No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been
established
7. No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions
8. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed
9. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed
10. No. of beneficiaries trained
85
Description of Success indicators and
measurement methodology
PMGSY
(i) Financial support provided to State Governments to
construct rural roads.
(ii) State Governments responsible to execute projects
(iii) Projects of State Governments sanctioned by
Ministry after examining their DPRs.
(iv) Progress periodically reviewed through reports
review meetings, field visits etc.
(v) Success indicators are:(a) Length of new roads
(b) Amount of fund released.
(c) Inspections done by National/State Quality Monitors.
86
Description of Success indicators and
measurement methodology
Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)
I.
(i)
(ii)
II.
III.
IV.
(i)
(ii)
This Centrally Sponsored Scheme is implemented :
By DRDAs at District Level
By PRIs at Gram Panchayat level.
Central Government releases funds and monitor
progress
Release of funds dependent on submission of
complete proposals by DRDAs for 2nd Installment.
Success indicators are:Amount of funds released.
Number of Houses sanctioned and constructed
87
Description of Success indicators and
measurement methodology
PURA
(i) Success indicators for 2012-13:Achievement of performance standards incorporated in
the Concession Agreement – as certified by the
Independent Engineer.
National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP)
I. All Schemes of NSAP are for poverty alleviation.
II. Funds to be released and number of beneficiaries
generally specified.
III. Process of identification of eligible beneficiaries under
IGNWPS and IGNDPS underway.
IV. Monitoring done through review meetings indicated
under various schemes.
88
Specific performance requirement from other
Departments
1.
State Government/UTs must submit complete
proposals well in time.
2. Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission
required for budget outlays.
MGNREGA:(i) Demands of PRIs to be projected timely.
(ii) Mechanism of convergence of various programmes
should be positively exploited.
SGSY/NRLM
• State Government/UTs must submit complete
proposals well in time.
• Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission
required for budget outlays.
• Support of Public Sector Banks required under
SGSY/NRLM for provision of credit for SHG
members and federations.
89
Specific performance requirement from
other Departments
PMGSY:(i) State agencies must implement programmes meticulously.
(ii) Timely provision of budgets and mobilization of assistance
from external agencies to be done meticulously.
IAY :(i) State/ UTs must submit timely proposal for release of funds.
(ii) They must timely release funds to beneficiaries and assist
them logistically.
(iii) Agencies to monitor constructions of houses in stipulated
time.
(iv) Public Sector Banks to provide loan to beneficiaries under
Differential Rate of Interest (DRI) Scheme with minimal
required documentation.
PURA:(i) Signing of State support Agreement for PURA
(ii) Sponsoring the PURA proposals for Public-Private Partnership
with private parties; signing of Concession Agreement for
PURA.
90
Outcome/Impact of the Ministry/Department
Section 6 : Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry
Outcome
/Impact
of
Department
/Ministry
Jointly
responsible
for influencing this
outcome/impact with
the
following
organization(s)/depar
tments/ministries
Success Indicator
Enhance
State
Governments,
livelihood security Ministry
of
Finance,
of households in Planning Commission
rural areas
1.1 Credit mobilised
for women SHGs
1.2
Total Wage
Expenditure
1.3 Wage Income per
household
2.1 Length of rural
roads constructed in
Kms.
Improved
allweather rural road
connectivity
-do-
Unit
20102011
20112012
20122013
20132014
20142015
Rs. In
crore
12622
-
-
-
-
-do-
25579
25686
16368
-
-
Rs.
Number
4865
45,109
4675
29,700
3996
24,400
27,000
32,000
2.2 Length of rural
roads upgraded in
Kms.
Enhanced
basic
housing to BPL
households
in
rural areas
-do-
Increase in coverage
of rural households
%
93.36
47.25
90
90
90
Improved social
assistance to the
elderly,
widow
and
disabled
persons
-do-
Increase
beneficiaries
%
105%
(215)
100%
(226)
100%
(315)
100%
(315)
100%
(315)
in
91
92