Oliver Zangwill Centre Presentation

Download Report

Transcript Oliver Zangwill Centre Presentation

Specialist services at OZC Andrew Bateman PhD MCSP

Ian ‘personal construct’ outcomes

Work hard and achieve things Happy and making others happy Head injury as the main thing in my life Feeling confident Pre-Injury self Ideal self 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 “GO OFF”, not achieve A problem for others One of the human race – just like every- one else Loss of confidence Change in ‘present self’ from start – end programme

History

 Centre founded by Prof Barbara Wilson, opened November 1996  Modelled on Adult Day Hospital, Phoenix Arizona & Oklahoma programme  Lifespan NHS Trust, Anglia & Oxford NHS Executive & MRC  National Service Influenced by work of Prigatano, Ben-Yishay & Christensen

Who was Oliver Zangwill ?

 Professor of Experimental Psychology, Cambridge University, 1952 - 1982.

 1940’s Edinburgh working with war injuries.

 Major influence on British rehabilitation.

 First to apply neuropsychological knowledge to rehabilitation.

Mission Statement To provide high quality rehabilitation for the individual cognitive, social, emotional, vocational and physical needs of people with non-progressive brain injury

Oliver Zangwill Centre Team

Clinical Manager Director of Research Research OT Research Fellow Research Assistant Clinical Specialist OT HEAD III OT Senior I OT Therapy Assistant Specialist SALT Lead SALT Lead Psychologist Support Manager Specialist SALT (BIRT) Clinical Psychologist Clinical Psychologist Course Administrator Research Assistant Psychology Assistant Psychology Assistant Admin Assistant NeuroPage

Research student at Uni.Cambridge

Jackie Galway Andrew Bateman Neuro Rehabilitation Clinical Lead CCS, Stroke E.C. & F City & South, Huntingdon Jill Winegardner Clinical Psychologist, (B8) P/T (Clinical/Supervision 02 3/7) Research 2/7 AIMS CLAHRC Clare Keohane Head Specialist Speech & Language Therapist (8A) P/T 3/7. Mon, Tues, Thurs Cat Ford Clinical Psychologist (B8A) F/T Emma Rehab Psychology Assistant vol) Temp, F/T Barbara Wilson P/T (1/7) Leah Bousie Rehab Psychology Assistant (B4) F/T Fiona Ashworth Clinical Psychologist (B7) F/T Chantel Williams Rehab Psychology Assistant (B4) F/T Eve Greenfield Research Occupationa l Therapist MRC-CBU (P/T) Gemma Hardy Sue Brentnall Head Occupational Therapist (B8A) P/T (5½ days 28) Band 7 (vacant) F/T Carolyne Threadgold Rehabilitation Assistant (B4) P/T 4/7 Research Assistant MRC-CBU (F/T) April – 4/7 Clinical/SPM 1/7 CLAHRC Occupational Therapist (B5) F/T Anna Piasceka Donna Malley Occupational Therapist Clinical Specialist (B8A) Rachel Harrison Psychology Research Assistant Apr il (F/T) OZ 3/7 Clinical/SPM 2/7 CLAHRC (new student) Psychology Research Assistant OZ (F/T) (Voluntary) 1/7CBU Band 7 Maria Martin Saez FT Leyla Prince Specialist Speech & Language Therapist (B7) F/T Diana McCollum Specialist Speech & Language Therapist (B7) Seconded manager of paediatric team (2 Paed) 1/7 ozc clinicall (P/T 1/7) Mon Weds Michelle Young Support Manager (B5) P/T 30hrs 5½ days Supervise all admin Sharon McEwing Personal/ Administration Assistant (B3) F/T Rachel Everett Marketing & Courses Administrator (B3) P/T 20hrs 2x full days (Mon, Tues), 1x½ day (Weds) Helen Howe Bank admin P/T 12hrs Am – Tues, Thurs, Fri Donna Moore NeuroPage Administrator (B2) P/T 15hrs Full – Mon, Part Weds/Fri TEMP Band 3 (?F/T) (Amy Rideout)

The Team

 3 Clinical Psychologists  2.6 (w.t.e.) Occupational Therapists  1.6 (w.t.e.) Speech & Language Therapists  3 Psychology/rehabilitation Assistants  1 Clinical Manager  4 Administrators  Visiting Neuropsychiatrist (0.1 w.t.e)  Access to Neurologist & Physiotherapy

Principles of rehabilitation approach

 Holistic approach  Addresses cognitive, emotional and social consequences of ABI  Hierarchy of stages (engagement, awareness, mastery, control, acceptance, identity)  Safe environment

5 activities of OZC

 Assessment  Rehabilitation  Research  Education  NeuroPage service  + neurorehab management for CCS

Assessment and Rehabilitation

Sources of Referrals

 Private: Self-referral, relative, solicitor, insurance company.

 NHS: G.P, NHS clinician, Consultant  Weekly preliminary assessments  Fortnightly detailed assessments  4 intakes per year for full programmes  Referrals to Andrew Bateman, Clinical Service Manager.

Referral criteria

 Adults with non-progressive acquired brain injury  Medically stable - +/- 18 months post injury  Not demonstrating severe disruptive behavioural disorders or marked physical disability  Capable of managing in community B&B or self-catering accommodation.

 Require IDT for cognitive, psychological and social issues restricting their participation in daily life

Client Demographics

Gender Female 27% 45+ 17% Age 16-24 19% Male 73% 35-44 22% 25-34 42% N=95

Client Demographics

Months Post Injury 5+ yrs 21% <=1 year 15% Anoxia 6% CVA 8% OHI 3% Aetiology Other 6% 4-5 yrs 14% 1-2 yrs 23% N=95 3-4 yrs 12% 2-3 yrs 15% CHI 77%

Living arrangements

 Local B&B or Hotel accommodation  Self-catering or rental  Travel reimbursement for people receiving benefits  Care support  Own evening meal

Stages of Assessment

 Preliminary Assessment: • 1 day • 1 clinician and assistant psychologist • Neuropsychological screening assessments & discussion with client & significant other • Future actions agreed  Detailed Assessment: • 8 days • Formal neuropsychological assessments • Functional discussion & observation • Experience aspects of the programme • Future actions agreed

Assessment

 Holistic neuropsychological assessment by experienced clinical team  cognitive functioning, incl. attention, memory & executive skills  perceptual skills  speech & language skills, incl. social communication  assessment of mood & behaviour  independent living skills, incl. vocational aspects  social context, incl. family & environmental considerations

The role of ‘formulation’

 The process of deriving hypotheses concerning the nature, causes and factors influencing current problems or a client’s current situation.  Considers the multitude of possible influences on an individual’s level of functioning and psychological state  Helps clinician, clinical team and the client to understand the problems.

The role of ‘formulation’

 Range of assessments and treatment interventions carried out by different professionals.  Opportunity to bring together results of these assessments into a single coherent formulation  Promotes a shared understanding of problems - visual element useful  Aids team working

Family/social support Brain pathology Stroke, head injury, etc Pre-morbid factors e.g. coping style

Cognitive Impairment

e.g. Memory Perception Language Attention Executive Insight

Affect

e.g. Depression Anxiety Anger Confidence Motivation Loss

Physical

e.g. Hemiplegia Sensory loss Dysarthria Pain

Functional consequences

e.g. Work ADL Leisure Driving Evans, Wilson et al 2009

Family factors Brain pathology Aneurysm

Personal beliefs Cognition & communication

Memory Problem solving Dual tasking

Identity:

who am I now?

Affect

Depression Worry & rumination

Physical

Headache Fatigue Body image

Loss of role Functional consequences

e.g. Avoidance of children avoidance of anything that highlights difficulties A biopsychosocial model (Evans, 2002)

Holistic Neuropsychological rehabilitation aims to:

 enable the client to gain awareness and understanding of the consequences of his/her brain injury,  facilitate acceptance and adjustment to the consequences of brain injury  enable the client to adopt compensatory strategies Therapeutic encounters are structured around the clients’ goals that will relate to functional daily activities, participation and vocational domains.

Aims of rehabilitation

Our rehabilitation aims are to: • Improve social participation • Enable engagement in meaningful activity in the home and community • Improve acceptance and understanding of the consequences of brain injury • Promote wellbeing of client and family

Environment Occupation Affective Spirituality Cognitive Physical Leisure Person From

Enabling Occupation: An Occupational Therapy Perspective, © CAOT 1997

Neuropsychological assessment   Psychometric Localisation  Cognitive  theoretical models  Exclusion models  Ecologically valid  models Following evaluation may need to revise approach Pre-morbid personality and life style Personality assessments Interviews European Injury Questionnaire Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcomes

Patient and family

Nature of brain injury?

   Severity?

Extent?

Location?

Neurological investigations Imaging Monitoring over time Reassessment Current problems     Cognitive Emotional Psychosocial Behavioural How much recovery to expect?

Theories of recovery Cause of brain damage?

Studies of changes over time Assess to identify these in detail Models of cognitive functioning      Language Reading Memory Executive Functioning Attention Emotional and Psychosocial Models e.g. models from Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Effect of affect on memory, attention, etc Behavioural Models e.g. SORKC Behavioural assessments    Observations Natural settings Simulated settings Self report measures interviews Questionnaires Checklist Rating scales Decide on treatment (negotiate goals with patient, family and staff members) Will you focus on    Impairments Disabilities or Handicap?

How will you teach/achieve this?

(Refer to theories of learning) How will you evaluate success or otherwise?

Will you try to   Restore lost function?

Encourage anatomical reorganisation?

    Use residual skills more efficiently?

Find an alternative means to the final goal?

Modify the environment?

Use a combination of the above?

From Wilson 2009 What evidence is there for the success of these approaches

Core Components (our reply to Prigatano core components)

 Therapeutic milieu  Compensatory strategies  Involvement of family  Psychological therapy  Functional & vocational meaningful activities  Shared team understanding

Stages of the Rehabilitation programme

 Full Rehabilitation programme • 24 weeks total • Intensive & integration phases • 1:1 & group sessions – Cognitive group – Understanding Brain Injury group – Mood Management group – Communication group – Psychological Support group – Other groups • Client-centred goal planning  Reviews 3, 6 & 12 months post-programme

IPC

 Allocated at DA & for Programme/Reviews  Main liaison with family and other professionals/services  Oversees programme for participants  Weekly contact  Co-ordinates reports & referrals

Goals

 Starting point at assessment with question ‘What are your goals for rehabilitation?’  Other tools used are the COPM, Rivermead Life Goals questionnaire and individual interviews.

 A team meeting is used to establish ‘SMART’ wording.

Goal Categories

 Understanding Brain Injury  E.g. Show an accurate understanding of her difficulties and be able to explain these to 2 relatives and 2 members of the Centre staff  Managing Daily Activities Independently  E.g. To be able to prepare a simple evening meal for the family on a weekly basis with supervision using identified strategies

Goal Categories

 Recreational Activities  E.g. Will be engaged in 2 chosen leisure activities on at least a weekly basis (playing pool and wood-work).

 Work or Study Plans  E.g. Will be engaged in a work trial and have an identified plan for return to paid employment within 6 months.

Outcomes

 Goal Achievement  Standardised Questionnaires  EBIQ  DEX  CSI  EuroQuol  COPM

Research

Research

 Professor Barbara Wilson OBE  Clinical team  Development, application & evaluation of developments in rehabilitation research.

 Current research programme  Recent presentations & publications  Links with MRC

Feeling hopeless about the future Feeling sad Feeling lonely Feelings of worthlessness Feeling inferior Feeling lonely, even when with others Feeling life is not worth living Preferring to be alone Crying easily Threshold map for depression subscale of EBIQ n=226 patients (baseline)

EBIQ Depression subscale

 Four items with significant mis-fit therefore removed  leaving robust 5 item scale  before and after data person location data entered into t test  n=44 start mean score 9.95; discharge 8.64; t = 3.4; p<0.01

Differential item functioning - before and after rehab.

Impact of rehabilitation on self rated responses to EBIQ item 9, (feeling hopeless about the future) uniform differential item function, n=44; F=4.12, p<0.05

F=4.08; p=0.04

Markers of recognition

          

& success at OZC

Client outcomes and feedback Visiting scholars 2008-9 from Thailand, Granada and Madrid, Toronto, Sao Paulo Published RCP guidelines for stroke Published peer-reviewed articles Published book Invited papers/conference speeches (?how many) New scholarship/learning to meet objectives eg anatomy (ongoing) vision (workshop, collaborations ongoing) New PhD students Lectureship in University Cambridge CLAHRC practitioner researchers

Courses

Courses

 A series of courses & workshops are run each year  Can offer courses specific to needs in topics related to neuropsychological rehabilitation  Further info. on current courses go to www.ozc.nhs.uk

NeuroPage

NeuroPage

 Currently 40 people using service regularly  Useful for people with memory difficulties, and dysexecutive difficulties  Evidence based service  recent text to voice development - ideal for those who can’t read  Text messaging developments, new “generations” of phones (eg video/image messages)

Thank you for your attention!

[email protected]