Transcript ASB/20 ANSP View on the future of FABEC

ASB/20 – ANSP view on the future of FABEC
on 4 key questions
DFS view
ATM services according to SES definitions
Airspace
Management
Air Navigation
Services*
Air Traffic Services
Air Traffic Flow
Management
Supporting Services
Communication Services
Area Control Service**
Navigation Services
Approach Control Service**
Surveillance Services
Aerodrome Control Service**
Aeronautical Information Services
* regulated, to be certified
** also to be designated
Meteorological Services**
2
FABEC ANSP performance goals for 2018
• Despite traffic growth safety remains stable
• Capacity for app. 50% more traffic and delay per flight
at max. 1 minute
• Reduction of the real unit costs by 17%
• Reduction of flight extension by 2 km per year until
2010 and accumulated to 10 KM by 2018, leading to
• A reduction of the impact on environment
3
Co-operations as enabler
to increase performance
Growing ANSP Cooperation
Coordination
Information
Exchange
(e.g. joint
international
representation)
(e.g. new
airspace design
between
Amsterdam,
Maastricht UAC’s
Ruhr Sector
and Frankfurt
(AMRUFRA))
Contractual
cooperation
(e.g. MoU
between DFS
and LVNL)
Joint venture
(e.g. Border
Triangle, FABEC
training entity)
Merger
(Single ANSP ?)
4
FABEC partners start from different
positions …
today
State 1
State 2
State 3
ANSP 1
ANSP 2
ANSP 3
• Enroute
• Approach
• Aerodrome
• Training
• CNS
• AIM
• Enroute
• Approach
• Aerodrome
• Training
• CNS
• AIM
• Enroute
• Approach
• Training
• CNS
• AIM
• Commercial
business
• Subsidiaries
• Aerodrome
• Subsidiaries
• Civil military co-operation (integration vs. co-location vs. separate military ANSP)
• Legal form (public authority vs. corporatised organisation)
• Funding
• Competitive elements in certain services
5
... with the consolidation of relevant services
in joint ventures
future
State 1
State 2
State 3
ANSP 1
ANSP 2
ANSP 3
FABEC Joint Ventures
• Commercial
business
• Aerodrome
services
• Overseas OPS
FABEC Management / Shared Services
FABEC enroute north
FABEC enroute south (Border Triangle)
FABEC Training
FABEC CNS
FABEC AIM
National ANSPs own the FABEC Joint Ventures.
6
ANSP view from a DFS perspective
100%
DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH
55%
Flight Calibration
Services GmbH
100%
DFSUnterstützungskasse GmbH
A%
Border Triangle
private legal
entity
36%
GroupEAD
Europe S.L.
B%
Other FABEC
Joint Venture
100%
The Tower
Company GmbH
C%
Other FABEC
Other
FABEC
Joint
Ventures
joint ventures
16,67%
European Satellite
Services Provider SAS
D%
FABEC Management
private legal entity
7
Back up
8
1. What parts of today’s ANSPs business should merge
into a FABEC entity / single ANSP? (1/3)
• Only those parts of today’s ANSPs are consolidated
leading to an increased FABEC performance.
• These parts are pooled service by service in separate
corporate entities
• According to specific needs, staff and asset transfers
are considered
• Corporate / administrative functions may be provided
by one Joint FABEC Management/ Shared Services
Entity
9
2. Who will be the owner of a FABEC entity / the single
ANSP?
• FABEC will very likely evolve over time via different
Joint Ventures that may end up in a single service
provider
• Today’s ANSPs are the owners of these FABEC Joint
Ventures.
10
3. What principles should be applied for the governance ?
• Regulatory governance is exercised by the states
 FABEC Council
• Corporate governance is exercised by the ANSPs
 FABEC Joint Ventures
• Company law directives by the states are also
exercised by the Supervisory boards and/or
shareholders
11
4. How should the transition towards a FABEC entity /
the single ANSP be designed (roadmap)?
• Create a FABEC Management private legal entity
• Start case by case (i.e. service by service), e.g. Border
Triangle Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre,
Training entity, joint AIM provision
• Allow different speeds
• Follow a modular and flexible approach
• Keep models open and scaleable for later joiners and
additional partners
• …
12