Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
Download
Report
Transcript Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
Office for the
Responsible Conduct of Research
Use of live, vertebrate
animal subjects in research
B. Helen Jost, PhD
IACUC Director
IACUC Co-Chair
Historical use of research animals
Research animals have been used as human
surrogates for well over a century
Without regulation
Often without concern for animal welfare
During that time, there were a number of
animal cruelty laws in several states across
the country
However, there were no laws that specifically
addressed the procurement and use of animals in
research
Genesis of animal research regulation
Several affiliated research groups formulated
and used standards of care for rodents
Standardized conditions were important to
experimental reproducibility
Animal welfare was also considered (3 R’s)
Dognapping of “strays” to sell to research labs
was a reality
In 1965, a story in Time about Pepper the
Dalmatian sparked a strong desire across the
country to halt this practice
The Animal Welfare Act
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) was
enacted in 1966
Only included dogs and cats
The AWA covers animals used in commerce,
exhibition, teaching, testing, and research
The AWA excludes:
Cold-blooded animals (reptiles, fish, frogs)
Animals used for agriculture (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats,
horses, llamas)
Mice, rats and birds purposely bred for use in research
■
90% animal research uses lab mice and rats
AWA oversight
Unannounced inspections by a USDA
Veterinary Medical Officer (VMO)
The VMO is charged with identifying
non-compliance with the AWA and its regulations
Visits facilities, inspects animals, reviews records
Non-compliant items (NCIs) are published on-line
and may incur fines
Identification and correction prior to inspection is
not cited as an NCI
Public Health Service Assurance
Institutions receiving PHS funds for animal
research must assure that research will be
conducted as described in the PHS Policy on
the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals
Must follow all applicable laws
Must follow the Guide to the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals
The Assurance is renewed every 5 years, with
reports submitted annually
Without this Assurance there is no NIH/NCI funding
for research involving animals
OLAW oversight
The Office of Lab Animal Welfare
monitors compliance with the PHS Policy
OLAW uses a mechanism of self-policing and
self-reporting
The institution identifies non-compliance and reports to
OLAW with corrective actions
There are no unannounced inspections
However, audits can occur, usually for cause
Serious and uncorrected violations can result in
the loss of PHS funding
To individuals
To the institution as a whole
AAALAC accreditation
Association
for the Assessment and
Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care
AAALAC is a voluntary organization that makes
recommendations based on results of site visits
Standards are continually updated to reflect
current knowledge in laboratory animal science
OLAW
accepts AAALAC accreditation
in lieu of additional OLAW oversight
Regulatory authority at UA
The University of Arizona is:
Registered with the USDA as a research institution
PHS assured
AAALAC accredited
The Institutional Official (IO) has ultimate
responsibility for the animal care and use
program
Vice President for Research
The Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee (IACUC) administers the animal
care and use program
The IACUC
IACUC membership must include:
Scientists
Veterinarians
Non-scientists
Non-affiliated “community” members
Due to the diversity of the Committee, the
rationale for the use of animals must be
written in easy to understand language
The “lay” description
Unlike humans, animals can’t consent
The IACUC acts as their voice
IACUC responsibilities
Oversees the Animal Care and Use Program
Make recommendations to the IO for improvements
Inspects animal housing and research labs
Semi-annual inspections
Ensures protocol participants have training
To understand the laws and ethics of animal research
To conduct specific animal activities
To understand occupational health issues
Reviews and approves animal research and
teaching
Protocols and amendments
IACUC review of animal studies
IACUC
review and approval is required for
all activities involving warm and cold
blooded vertebrate animals, including:
Research
Teaching
Agriculture or field studies
Use of UA-funded animals at other institutions
Approval
must be obtained before the
work begins
Description of animal activities
A brief description of the aim/purpose
A narrative description of all animal activities, in
the order they will occur
Identification of the scientific endpoints
The point at which the experimental aims are met
Identification of humane endpoints
The point at which animals must be removed from the
study, even if the experimental aims are not met
Identification of pain and distress
Clinical signs
How will pain/distress be alleviated?
Why can’t pain/distress be alleviated?
Modifications to approved activities
Any
changes in your research with animals
must be approved before the work starts
Additional animals or species
Addition of new strains or breeding
New or modified procedures or time points
Additional of surgery
Additional drugs/compounds
Changes in dosages/administration route
Changes in euthanasia methods
The ethical balance
Scientific
value
Ethical
cost
To humans
Pain
To animals
Distress
To science
Morbidity
To society
Mortality
The 3 R’s (Russell and Birch, 1959)
3 R’s are one tool that the IACUC uses
to balance the scales
The
Can we replace the use of animals with
non-
animal models or lower species?
Can we reduce the number of animals used and
still achieve statistically significant data?
Can we refine the procedures to minimize or
eliminate pain and distress?
Do animals need to be used?
Does the benefit outweigh the harm to the animal?
The data can be translated into future human or animal
clinical studies
■
Development of drugs or therapies
When there are clear benefits to society and the
advancement of knowledge
■
Species ecology and conservation
Can a non-animal model be used?
In vitro assays, tissue culture
Computer models, simulations
Manikins, especially for training
Does the species need to be used?
Hierarchy of species
Non-human primates
Farm animals (cattle, pigs, sheep)
Rabbits, ferrets
USDA
regulated
Companion animals (dogs, cats)
Guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils
Lab rats
Lab mice
Fish, frogs
Invertebrates
Ag and field studies do not follow this paradigm
Not animal models
Are the fewest animals used?
The number of animals requested must be
justified
The number of animals per experimental
group should be consistent with generation
of scientifically sound data
Justification
can include use of:
A statistical method to ensure a p value
Previously documented experience (PI or
literature)
The most important R – refine?
Review current scientific literature to identify
modified techniques that reduce pain or distress
Use appropriate sedation, analgesia and/or
anesthesia for painful or distressful procedures
Limit the number of procedures experienced by
any individual animal
Ensure adequate post-procedural care
Know the signs of pain and distress
Identify appropriate scientific and humane
endpoints
Remove animals from the study based on humane
endpoints to minimize pain and suffering
The ethics of animal research
Animal research is affected by the same ethical
issues as other kinds of research
Data fabrication or falsification; researcher bias;
conflict of interest; intellectual property issues;
misuse of funds
However, there is also protocol non-compliance,
that is performing animal activities that have not
been reviewed and approved by the IACUC
Non-compliance may be reportable to the USDA or
OLAW
It is critical that everyone know what is approved
Submit amendments to modify animal activities before
starting the work
The ethics of animal research
As scientists, we should be aware of the impact
that animal research has on our accumulated
knowledge
Much of what we know about the biological sciences
had its start with animal research
Most human studies being conducted today rely directly
or indirectly on data from animal studies
However, animal research should only be
undertaken
After careful consideration of the scientific value
obtained as compared to the ethical cost of using
animals
With the utmost concern for animal welfare
IACUC Contacts
Sean Limesand, PhD, IACUC Chair
Phone: 626-8903
Email: [email protected]
David Besselsen, DVM, PhD, Attending Veterinarian
Phone: 626-1066 or 621-1564
Email: [email protected]
Helen Jost, PhD, IACUC Director and IACUC co-Chair
Phone: 626-5304
Email: [email protected]
Or email: [email protected]
Resources
USDA Animal Welfare Act
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/an
imalwelfare?1dmy&urile=wcm%3apath%3a%2Faphis_
content_library%2Fsa_our_focus%2Fsa_animal_welfar
e%2Fsa_awa%2Fct_awa_program_information
PHS Policy
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/phspol.htm
The Guide
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/Guide-for-the-Care-
and-Use-of-Laboratory-Animals.pdf
IACUC home page
http://orcr.arizona.edu/iacuc