to view the presentation - New York State Office of Children and
Download
Report
Transcript to view the presentation - New York State Office of Children and
OCC/NCCCSIA Program
Integrity Conference Call
Series 2012
New York State Child Care
Subsidy Making Every Dollar
Count
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
INTRODUCTIONS
Shannon Rudisill, Director, Office of Child Care
Carol Pearson, NCCCSIA Project Director
New York State Presenters
• Janice Molnar, Deputy Commissioner Division of Child Care Services
• Renee Rider, Assistant Commissioner Division of Child Care Services,
• Jim Hart, Director of Regional Operations Division of Child Care
Services,
• Rhonda Duffney, Acting Director of the Child Care Subsidy Program
• Sean Hicks, Supervising Welfare Fraud Investigator
• Albany County DSS
• Katherine Waluschka, Associate Commissioner Westchester County
DSS
AGENDA
Overview of New York State Child Care
Making Every Dollar Count
Child Care Subsidy Regulations
New York State Projects:
Albany County
Westchester County
Program Integrity
CCDF Fraud Prevention,
Detection, and Recovery
April 11, 2012
New York State
Office of Children and Family Services
Gladys Carrión, Esq.
Commissioner
Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor
Mission of OCFS
“Promoting the safety, permanency and well being
of our children, families, and communities. We will
achieve results by setting and enforcing policies,
building partnerships, and funding and providing
quality services.”
New York State: An Overview
NYS is a large state, comprising 62
counties, over 47,000 sq. miles, and
almost 19.5 million people
NYS is a state-supervised, countyadministered system
The counties/local social services districts
have significant decision-making authority
with respect to their administration of the
child care subsidy program
Regulated Child Care
in New York State
(*Data as of 1/1/12)
Subsidized
Child Care in New York State
Subsidized
Child Care in New York State
In FFY 2011, the modalities of care for
children receiving subsidies:
61% in regulated care (34% in licensed child care
centers, 27% in regulated family child care homes,
including group family child care)
39% in legally-exempt care, almost exclusively
home-based setting:
51,103 legally-exempt providers served
95,887 subsidized children over the course of the
year
Program Integrity
in New York State: Context
2010 was a banner year for NYS Investigation of $18M fraud ring in New York
City announced in August, 2010
GAO study, in which 5 states – including NYS
– were found to be vulnerable to fraud,
released in September, 2010
“What Are We Going to Do About This?”
We started with listening and learning
New York State Takes Action
October, 2010 roundtable: “Child Care Subsidy in
New York State: Making Every Dollar Count”
Focus: Program integrity
Participants: Local prosecutors, local social
services commissioners, caseworkers, fraud
investigators, child care advocates, among others
Goal: to generate recommendations for changes in
policy and program supports, and to create an
action plan to guide efforts to improve the level of
program integrity at all levels of government
Child Care Subsidy in New York
State: Making Every Dollar Count
Peer-learning – keynote speaker: Jim Bates
from Wisconsin
All-day working session
Breakout sessions
Group report outs
Recommendations for changes
See the OCFS website for more information:
http://www.ocfs.state.ny.us/main/childcare/programintegrity/
Making Every Dollar Count:
Recommendations for Change
Focus on front-end detection (FEDS)
Break down silos
Between licensing/regulation and subsidy administration
Between OCFS child care staff and local fraud investigators and agencies
Give counties more authority to take action when fraud is
identified
Create a financial incentive for counties that engage in
fraud detection and prevention
Automate a statewide child care time and attendance
system
Create a data-mining system that helps predict and
identify fraud
Steps New York State Has Taken
to Prevent Waste, Fraud, & Abuse
Issued new child care subsidy regulations
Deployed an automated child care time and attendance system
in all of the counties outside the City of New York
Learned from the information technology vendor community
about implementing a statewide technical solution that predicts
fraudulent activity
Identified resources for counties to use toward identifying,
investigating and prosecuting child care subsidy fraud
Created an investigative protocol for child care inspectors of
regulatory care and county caseworkers to work together to
address fraud
Partnered with the NY Welfare Fraud Investigator’s Association
Front End Detection System (FEDS)
Purpose of FEDS:
Refer, investigate and resolve applications before a
case is opened
Act as a deterrent
Applications that meet FEDS indicators are
referred to the investigations unit within each
local district/county
Front End Detection System (FEDS)
FEDS indicators must be approved by OCFS
FEDS investigations must be conducted in an
expeditious manner
Examples of FEDS indicators:
P.O. Box supplied as a mailing address without a reasonable
explanation
Applicant cannot provide a birth certificate for a child younger than
6 years
Applicant is self employed, but cannot provide adequate business
records
Child care provider lives in same household as the child
New Child Care Subsidy Fraud
Regulations
OCFS revised the child care subsidy
regulations to:
Provide local social services districts with
more authority to stop child care payments
where appropriate
Initiate enforcement actions against child
care providers when they are found to be
engaging in fraudulent activities
Child Care Subsidy Fraud
Regulations
Child care subsidy regulations now allow
counties to:
Defer a claim for reimbursement
Disallow payments
Disqualify a provider from receiving payment
for services
Child Care Subsidy Fraud
Regulations (cont’d.)
Provider may be disqualified if they have:
Been convicted of fraud
Been found civilly liable for fraud
Voluntarily admitted to fraud
Voluntarily admitted to filing a false statement
Child Care Subsidy Fraud
Regulations (cont’d.)
Provider may be disqualified if they have:
Been convicted of activity indicating lack of
business integrity
Been disqualified from the Child and Adult
Care Food Program (CACFP)
Failed to comply with a repayment plan
Been found to have submitted false claims,
after an administrative review was
conducted by the county
Child Care Subsidy Fraud
Regulations (cont’d.)
Disqualification Penalties:
Provider ineligible to receive child care subsidy
payment for 5 years
Provider must make full restitution
Failure to make full restitution will result in the
provider being ineligible to provide subsidized
child care
Child Care Time & Attendance
(CCTA)
CCTA Design:
Key parameter: CCTA is parent-driven
CCTA is designed to support:
Parent time-in/time-out
Provider web submittal
Automated pay calculation
Export calculations to statewide payment system
CCTA helps identify Red Flags
Program Integrity-Technical Solution
Current challenge: various disparate data sources that
exist; lack of data integration between systems/data in
“silos”
September 2011- released a Request For Information (RFI)
Lessons learned: Spectrum of services should include, but
are not limited to:
Data integration
Rules management
Anomaly detection
Predictive modeling
Social networking analysis
Forensic review
Fraud case management
Program Integrity-Technical Solution
Next steps:
OCFS to release a Request for Proposal (RFP)
Implement a tool that will analyze and integrate data
from the various data systems in NYS
Run data against various predictors/red flags identified
as highly indicative of fraudulent activity
Focus investigations on cases that have a higher
propensity of fraudulent activity
Can you tell who the fraudulent
provider is?
A
B
C
D
26
Child Care Fraud Prevention
& Detection Incentive Program
Competitive grants program for local county social
services districts
12-month initiative, starting April 1, 2012
$1.2M total funding pool
Flexible funding, tiered according to child population
(maximum grants of $40,000, $60,000, or $100,000
for small, medium, and high child population counties,
respectively)
Child Care Fraud Prevention
& Detection Incentive Program
(con’t.d)
20 winning counties
Proposed outcomes considered relative to each
applicant’s goals – and starting place
Many promising practices in the winning proposals, for
example:
Data matching between CCTA and CACFP
databases
More emphasis on FEDS and referring them
for investigation
Profile on the Counties
Albany County
&
Westchester County
• Albany County
• Westchester
County
Albany County, New York
Child Care Program
304,204 residents in
Albany County
375 legally-exempt
providers in any given
month
25-30 anticipated newly
enrolled providers monthly
Albany County
Child Care Fraud Initiative 2011
Full-time investigator out-posted to child care and
accounting division
Improved accessibility to investigator
Strengthened partnership between child care and
investigative staff
Accomplishments
$216,000+ in total fraud detected
$80,000+ in recoveries (cash restitution)
$198,000+ in cost avoidance (disqualifications)
Investigative Approach:
Home Visits
Unscheduled visits
Outside traditional hours
Looking to verify:
If care is being provided
Identity of provider
The actual children in attendance
Procedure of recording attendance
Prevention/Education
Review of county forms
Proper billing procedures/expectations
Payment expectations
Reporting changes
Definition of fraud and abuse
Penalties for fraud
Reporting suspected fraud and abuse
For new providers:
Mandatory informational meeting with orientation to above
Introduction to CCTA and strong encouragement for participation
Westchester County Day Care
Subsidy Fraud, Waste and Abuse
Prevention Initiatives
WCDSS Organizational Structure
& Day Care Subsidies
Four District
Offices
Day Care for
TA recipients
Centralized
Day Care
Subsidy Unit
Central
Program
Office
Payment
Processing
Bureau of
Case Review
Low Income
and Title XX
Roster
Review for
Cost
Avoidance
Process
Payments w/
CCTA and
BICS
Fraud
Investigation
Refer cases
for
Prosecution
Cost Avoidance Resulting from
Roster Review
January 2009 - December 2009
$682,895
Monthly average cost avoidance in 2009 = $56,908
January 2010 - December 2010
$917, 214
Monthly average cost avoidance in 2010 = $76,435
January 2011 - December 2011
$788,721
Monthly average cost avoidance in 2011 = $65,727
Current & Past BCR Initiatives
FEDS: May - November 2011
235 FEDS cases reviewed
112 slots closed
Cost avoidance: $643,554
Audit and Review of ongoing cases: First 11 months of 2011
892 service cases (Low Income and Title XX) reviewed
502 temporary assistance related subsidy cases reviewed
153 slots discontinued as a result of review
Cost avoidance: $1.19 million to the county
Review of sign-in sheets at centers
Reconciliation with claims submitted on rosters
Amount of overpayments identified in 2011: $41,391 (centers)
New & Enhanced Initiatives
Provider Fraud
Creation of HOT LINE and
Public Awareness
Campaign
Training of fiscal staff in
forensic auditing
Increased audits
Increased investigation
For additional information
contact:
[email protected]
Customer Fraud
HOT LINE and Public
Awareness Campaign
Credit Checks
Lexis Nexis/Accurint
Employment History
Assets
Criminal Records
Increase staff in BCR
Increase percentage
of cases reviewed
Questions
and
Answers
Contact OCFS: 518-474-9454
http://www.ocfs.state.ny.us/main/childcare
New York State Presenters:
Janice Molnar, Deputy Commissioner
Division of Child Care Services, NYS Office of Children and Family Services
Renee Rider, Assistant Commissioner
Division of Child Care Services, NYS Office of Children and Family Services
Jim Hart, Director of Regional Operations
Division of Child Care Services, NYS Office of Children and Family Services
Rhonda Duffney, Acting Director of the Child Care Subsidy Program
Division of Child Care Services, NYS Office of Children and Family Services
Sean Hicks, Supervising Welfare Fraud Investigator
Albany County Department of Social Services
Katherine Waluschka, Associate Commissioner
Westchester County Department of Social Services