Open - durbit.se

Download Report

Transcript Open - durbit.se

Video Detection Solutions
Improving road and tunnel
safety via incident
management:
implementing a video image
processing system
Benjamin Schiereck, Sales Manger Traficon Germany
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Outline of Presentation
• Introduction
• Incident Management: Video Based Incident
Detection
 Basic Functions of Incident Management
 Video Image Processing Functions, Methodology & System
architecture
 Detection rate
 Automatic Incident Detection system
 Cases (Eye on fire in a tunnel)
 Typical Freeway and Tunnel AVI files
• Summary
• Conclusions
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Introduction
Time
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Basic Functions of Incident Management
1. Traffic Monitoring,
Prevention
2. Incident Detection
3. Incident Verification
4. Driver Information
5. Incident Clearing
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Traffic Monitoring – Prevention
• Most important is safe infrastructure
• Monitor traffic situation, speed and
occupancy using video cameras.
• Set appropriate speeds on VMS panels
• Fast information about the incident
• Fast reaktion on incident
– e.G.. Closing the Tunnel
All about time
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Traffic Monitoring on Highway
using cameras!!
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Traffic Monitoring in Tunnel
•
•
Access control, situation in the Tunnel
Monitoring actions with video
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
•
•
Slow driving vehicle
Traffic jam in tunnel
Speed differences
Occupancy
Intervehicle distances
VMS Panels
Ventilation control
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Detection Rate
Incident Detection with respect to dedicated camera positions for incident detection
Indoors
(tunnel)
Outdoors
Time to detect
 98
 95
10 sec
 99,9
 99,5
2 sec
 95
 95
< 1 sec
flow speed (maximal error)
 10 %
 10 %
false alarm frequency
(per camera / per day)
 0,025
 0,15
stopped vehicles (%)
queue (%)
inverse direction (%)
Data collection for Outdoors Applications and for dedicated camera positions for data
collection
Counti
ng
Speed
Queue
> 98 %
> 95% with errors < 5%
99%
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Direct Incident detection,
Time to Detect, Time to Verify
1. Importance to avoid traffic jams
Verona, ITALY
Foix, FRANCE
2. Importance to avoid secondary accidents
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Incident Management
Video Based Incident Detection
Verona, ITALY
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Video Image Processing Functions
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Stopped vehicle
Slow moving
Counting
Inverse direction
Distances between cars
Fallen objects
Pedestrians
Smoke
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
System Architecture
CAMERA
VIP
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
TMS
Case 1: Fire in a Tunnel – Oslo 1996
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Video Image Processing Methodology
Evolution of Fires of Vehicles in and around Tunnels
Type of
Vehicle
Stopped
Vehicle
Visible
Smoke
First
Visible
Flames
Global
Fire
Car
0 min.
3 min.
5 min.
8 min.
Van
0 min.
5 min.
8 min.
15 min.
0 min.
Fast
Fast
Fast
0 min.
10 min.
12 min.
20 min.
Engine fire
(2%)
Brake Fire
(98%)
Data from Escota France,1999
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Case 2: ORESUND - Situation
• Because this is quite a long tunnel
at under sea level, the owner
requested a highly redundant
system with a very high detection
rate, high reliability (MTBF) and a
very high level of service (%
Uptime).
• This was one of the reasons why the
detection cameras were installed at 60
metres distance, but programmed to
cover at least 120 m.
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
ORESUND : Other considerations
•
•
•
•
Detection Rate
False Detections
False Detection Cost
Reliability
Öresund
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Redundancy
Figure1: Distance between two cameras set at 100 metres without
overlapping field of view
C1
100m
C2
100m
C3
C4
100m
C5
100m
100m
C6
100m
Figure 2: Distance between two cameras set at 60 metres with
overlapping field of view
C1
C2
60m
C3
60m
C4
60m
60m
C5
60m
C6
60m
60m
120m
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Video Detection examples:
Tunnel Applications
Stopped Vehicle Detection
Incident Detection
Inverse Direction Detection
Pedestrian Detection
Smoke Detection
Object Detection
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Video Detection examples:
Highway & Bridge Applications
Stopped Vehicle Detection
Inverse Direction Detection
at night
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Summary
Basic Advantages of
Video Based Incident Detection:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Fast incident detection rate
Visual verification
High system reliability
Easy to install and modify
Low false detection rate & cost
Low overall lifetime cost
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Conclusions
• Video detection works reliable.
• Video detection is the fastest way to detect.
• Video detection has the lowest false alarms rate.
• Video detection offers immediate verification
via CCTV.
•
AID, Automatic Incident detection is the best
detection method for Incident management
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Why use other incident detection
if you will verify by video?
Just use Video Incident detection
Directly
Thank You
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection
Tel Germany +49 (0) 5446 – 20 65 32
E-mail: [email protected]
www.traficon.com
THE Reference in Traffic Video Detection