Ambulance Quality Indicators 2012

Download Report

Transcript Ambulance Quality Indicators 2012

Ambulance Quality Indicators: Clinical Outcomes

What do the Clinical AQIs measure?

Are they targets?

Why were those complaints chosen?

How reliable/accurate is the data?

AMBULANCE QUALITY INDICATORS

How are we driving quality?

How are the AQIs measured?

What are ‘Care Bundles’?

What does ‘STEMI’, ‘ROSC’ and ‘Utstein’ mean?

How is the NEAS performing?

Background

 Cat B19 target replaced with 11 new indicators  Response Times/Targets Quality of Care/Outcomes  Audited Monthly, Reported Quarterly  Pilot: Apr 2011- Mar 2012 Live: Apr 2012  Whole Sample and Patient Care Pathway  Openness and Transparency

What are we measuring and Why?

3 Medical Complaints:  Cardiac Arrest  Stroke  STEMI

All three complaints are life threatening, require treatment as soon as possible and have registries planned to report on patient outcomes in the near future …

Patient Outcomes Cardiac Arrest:

1. Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)

Measures how many patients who are in cardiac arrest but following resuscitation have a pulse/heartbeat on arrival at hospital.

2. Survival to Discharge Rates

Measures the rate of those who recover from cardiac arrest and are subsequently discharged from hospital

Two Groups:

2. A Sub-Group (‘UTSTEIN’)

1. The Whole Group

VF/VT NON-SHOCKABLE RHYTHM

Return of Spontaneous Circulation - ROSC

Patient has received CPR following Cardiac Arrest

Yes (denominator) no

Patient regains a heart beat on scene

Yes (ROSC)

Patient is transported to hospital and retains a ROSC at hospital doors

Yes

ROSC on arrival at hospital

no no exclude exclude exclude

ROSC on arrival at hospital = X

Survival to Discharge

Patient is alive according to NHS Spine

Yes no exclude

Hospital can verify that patient was discharged

Yes no exclude

Survival to Discharge nominator

* Survival Rate is as a proportion of total cardiac arrest sample, e.g. if 5 patients survive out of a total of 100 patients, rate = 5%

Cardiac Arrest - ROSC

35.0

% of Cardiac Arrest Patients where CPR was attempted achieving a ROSC on arrival at hospital

30.0

25.0

20.0

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0

NEAS National Average 80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

% of Cardiac Arrest Patients in VF/VT achieving a ROSC on arrival at hospital

NEAS National Average • High no. young patients and bystander CPR in May & August • NEAS is below the national average for the whole sample and above the national average for the Utstein sample • Local guidelines changed in August ‘11 – potentially successful

Cardiac Arrest – Survival to Discharge

18.0

16.0

14.0

12.0

10.0

8.0

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0

Survival to Discharge: All Cardiac Arrest Patients where CPR has been attempted

NEAS National Average 60.0

Survival to Discharge: All Patients in VF/VT where CPR has been attempted

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

NEAS National Average • High no. young patients and bystander CPR in May & August • NEAS is generally above the national average for both samples • May see a slow decrease as we rely on data from Acute Trusts. If we do not receive data we must exclude from sample

utcomes Stroke

Measures the time it takes from the 999 call to the arrival at a specialist stroke centre so that they can be rapidly assessed for treatment called thrombolysis.

STEMI

Measures the time it takes from the 999 call to the patient receiving angioplasty at a PPCI Centre. Data extracted from MINAP.

STEMI is an acronym meaning 'ST segment elevation myocardial infarction', which is a type of heart attack

utcomes

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

% of STEMI patients arriving at a PPCI within 150 mins

NEAS National Average • Increase from August as MINAP internally scrutinised • Now transporting patients in a safe and efficient timeframe • Above national average • Potential delay within the PPCI centre?

utcomes

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

% of Stroke patients arriving at a Hyper-acute Centre within 60mins

NEAS National Average • One of the best performing Trusts • Demonstrating that we are transporting patients in a safe and efficient timeframe • Above national average • Audit those cases which exceeded 60mins

Care Bundles

“A Care Bundle is a group of interventions related to a condition that, when delivered together, result in better outcomes than when implemented individually.”

(AQI Technical Guidance, 2011) GTN FAST Test Aspirin STEMI Pain Relief 2 Pain Scores Blood Pressure Stroke Blood Glucose

100.0

90.0

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

Care Bundles - STEMI

% of STEMI patients receiving the appropriate Care Bundle

NEAS National Average • Continuous quality improvement since June 2011 • Sample approx. 80 cases/month – 10/74 patients in Sept did not receive Care Bundle • Now above national average but need to continue to drive improvements • Feedback Log

98.0

96.0

94.0

92.0

90.0

88.0

86.0

84.0

82.0

80.0

Care Bundles - Stroke

% Stroke Patients receiving the appropriate Care Bundle

NEAS National Average • Fluctuates each month • Sample approx. 400 cases/month – Generally 10 patients do not receive Care Bundle each month • Now above national average but need to continue to drive improvements • Feedback Log

Quality Assurance

ASSURANCE

Audit 100% of cases

RISK

PRF documentation reflects performance Manual audits Audit areas of potential risk e.g. stroke >60mins MINAP / SINAP Collaborate with Operational Management to improve quality Feedback log used in Performance Management, Appraisals and Training WQA / Sunderland Internal Audit / NEAS Internal Audit Reliance on hospitals for outcome data

Continuously Improving Patient Care…

ROSC is continuously improving e.g. for VF/VT patients, 28% in 2010 → 46% in 2011 Continuously in the Top 2 Trusts in England for transporting stroke patients within a safe timeframe Post cardiac arrest patients have a higher than average survival rate in the North-East following care by NEAS NEAS have a strategy in place to drive quality improvement using clinical audit data

Any Questions…?