Real Property Receiverships: Strategy, Ethics, and Practice Tips

Download Report

Transcript Real Property Receiverships: Strategy, Ethics, and Practice Tips

Real Property Receiverships:
Strategy, Ethics, and Practice Tips
Chris Chauvin & Matt Mitzner
Flower Mound Bar Association
October 31, 2014
Where It Begins
● So you have some valuable property…
►
Collateral securing loan (e.g., real estate)
►
Businesses/Partnerships
● And you’re worried about…
►
The property’s future
►
An unsecured loss
● Options
2
►
Wait and sue for damages
►
Get a receiver
►
Foreclose
Real Property vs. Corporate
● Real property receiver
►
Exclusive possession and control
− Landowner retains ownership
− Rents and profits
● Corporate receiver
3
►
Control of all corporate activity and property
►
Generally controls several pieces real property
Real Property & Corporate Receiverships
● Foreclosure instead of receiver
►
Client just following normal receivership protocol?
− Can you articulate the specific reason why someone other than
the borrower/current business owner—for some period of
time—needs to take control of the property?
►
Court/borrower known for opposing receiverships?
− Above articulation + devious/adversarial borrower
►
Court seeking to load receivership with unwanted or
overwrought conditions?
− If you can trust the receiver, empower him/her in the order
− If you don’t like the conditions, foreclosure is the quickest
work-around
4
Real Property Receivership
● Types
►
Multi-family
►
Shopping center
►
Hotel
►
Office building
● Types of receivers
5
►
Property manager
►
Attorney
►
Forensic accountant
Real Property Receivership
● Receiver Instead of Foreclosure
►
What is the condition of the property?
− Will your client be able to sell the collateral in its current
condition?
− Are there any environmental concerns/latent liabilities?
6
Early Questions in the
Receivership Process
● Marshal evidence
►
Defaults and standing
►
Appraisals
►
Mechanic’s liens/tax liens/code violations
►
Property condition report
● Contractual agreement to receiver
►
Riverside Properties v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass’n of America,
590 S.W.2d 736, 738 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 1979)
● State versus federal court
7
►
Subject matter jurisdiction
►
Timing and cost
Texas State Court Receivership (cont.)
● Possibly faster and cheaper
● Procedure and strategy
►
TRCP 695: Three days’ notice
►
Ex parte burden
►
Easy amendment
►
Couple with request for TRO trapping rents
● Grounds: CPRC § 64.001
8
►
Secured creditor
►
64.001(b): danger of being lost, removed, or materially
injured
Texas State Court Receivership (cont.)
● Rules of equity apply (CPRC § 64.004)
● Who can be receiver? CPRC § 64.021
►
Texas citizen and qualified voter at time of appointment
►
Not interested in lawsuit
►
Maintain Texas residence during lawsuit
● Bonds
►
Receiver (CPRC § 64.023)
►
Applicant (TRCP 695a)
● Oath (CPRC § 64.022)
9
Texas State Court Receivership (cont.)
● Duties
►
Primarily governed by the order
►
CPRC § 64.031: possession, collect rents, compromise
claims
● Application of rents/proceeds
10
►
Primarily governed by the order
►
CPRC § 64.051: receiver costs and obligations first, then
pre-receiver obligations
Texas State Court Receivership (cont.)
● Receiver liability
11
►
CPRC § 64.052: suit may be brought where claimant
resides
►
CPRC § 64.053: judgment paid from receivership funds
►
CPRC § 64.054: judgment lien against receiver primes
senior secured creditor
Texas Federal Court Receiver
● Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 66
►
No standard provided
● Santibanez v. McMahon & Co., 105 F.3d 234, 241-42
(5th Cir. 1997)
12
►
a valid claim by the party seeking the appointment;
►
the probability that fraudulent conduct has or will occur;
►
imminent danger that property will be concealed, lost, or diminished in value;
►
(4)inadequacy of legal remedies;
►
(5)lack of a less drastic equitable remedy;
►
(6)likelihood that receiver will do more good than harm;
►
(7)the property being of insufficient value to insure payment; and
►
(8)poor financial standing of the borrower.
Texas Federal Court Receiver (cont.)
● No specific receiver qualifications
►
Out of state
►
Entity
● 28 U.S.C. § 754: property in multiple states
►
Domesticate order within 10 days
● 28 USC § 1692: service of summons as if property
in one district
13
Texas Federal Court Receiver (cont.)
● 28 USC § 2001: receiver sale procedures
►
Notice and hearing to all interest parties
►
Receiver reports to court on marketing and sales
procedures
►
Standard: best interest of the property
►
Court appoints three appraisers
− 2/3 appraised value requirement
− Offer 10% more than proposed sale price kills sale
►
14
As court to waive procedures based on robust marketing
Problems to Anticipate
● Potential Problems with Receivership
►
Court appoints a “good friend”
− Court refuses to appoint receivership professional
►
Receiver is untrustworthy
− Receiver’s typical nonliability for mismanagement or
misappropriation of funds post-receivership
►
Court is slow or apathetic
− Inability to get the Court’s intervention to stop worse
mismanagement by receiver
►
15
Court refuses to permit quick move to foreclose
Ethical Issues
● Be careful with “your proposed” receiver
16
►
Pre-filing strategy
►
Personal associations/communications
►
Offers to “work for free” in exchange for cut of listings,
leasing commission, and property management
Winding Down Receivership
● How long should it last?
● Property disposition options
►
Receiver sale
►
Foreclosure
►
Deed in lieu
● Court authorization
● Remitting cash flow
17
Receivership and Bankruptcy
● Debtor Files Bankruptcy After Receiver Appointed
►
Property Turned Over to Debtor-in-Possession Unless
Receivership in Place for 120 Days (Amaravathi)
● What if Bankruptcy Court Leaves Receiver in
Possession?
►
18
Accuracy of Financial Information from Receiver for Plan of
Reorganization
Impact of Guaranties
● General types of Guaranties in Commercial Loans
Secured by Real Property
− Nonrecourse
− Nonrecourse with “Bad Boy” carveouts
− Recourse
● Form guaranties in the industry typically shift the total
deficiency risk to borrowers
● … But if it’s a reputable or professional borrower, then the
guaranty is likely nonrecourse
19
Impact of Guaranties
● Receiver Instead of Foreclosure
►
Guaranty will help direct choice re: receiver
− Deficiency: difference between value of property at foreclosure
sale and the loan balance, interest, and attorneys’ fees
►
Do you have a solvent guarantor?
− Foreclosure risks mitigated by solvent-guarantor’s liability
20
Impact of Guaranties
● Do you have a recourse guaranty?
►
Nonrecourse guaranties (only remedy is recovering the
collateral) make receivership far more central to your
strategy
►
Evidence uncovered without obstacle
− Receiver preceding suit strengthens your suit, especially for
federal court
− Receiver will identify liability for “Bad Boy” carveouts
●
21
Shifting this risk to the borrower is paramount for the interests of
lender clients
Impact of Guaranties
● Courts will enforce guaranties, but they carry a “disfavored”
status under Texas law
● Possible defenses
22
►
No default
►
Bad assignment (loan docs not in order)
►
Disputed signature
►
Windfall deficiency due to disputed fair-market-value at
time of foreclosure, etc.
Guarantor’s Waiver of Defenses
● Guarantor’s broad waiver of defenses enforced
►
“All defenses”
− Moayedi v. Interstate 35/Chisam Road, L.P., —S.W.3d—, 57
Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 724 (Tex. June 13, 2014)
►
“Offset”
− LaSalle Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Sleutel, 289 F.3d 837 (5th Cir. 2000)
►
23
Every defense but full and final payment waivable
Questions?
24