Transcript now

Changing the way CQC regulates, inspects and monitors care

1

Our purpose and role

Our purpose

We make sure health and social care services provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care and we encourage care services to improve

Our role

We monitor, inspect and regulate services to make sure they meet fundamental standards of quality and safety and we publish what we find, including performance ratings to help people choose care

We will be a strong, independent and expert inspectorate that is always on the side of people who use services

2

Adult social care vision

The Mum Test

Is it responsive to people’s needs?

Is it effective?

Is it well-led?

Is it safe?

Is it caring?

Is it good enough for my Mum?

3

Our new approach

4

Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards

Duty to monitor the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Inspect and report on services’ approach to meeting the Mental Capacity Act code of practice In particular, we look at how and when capacity is assessed and how decisions are recorded in compliance with the Mental Capacity Act Included in our prompts and descriptions of ratings for safety, effectiveness and caring 5

Making the Mum Test Real

Communication

6

What will be different?

Now

Risk based model

Future

More targeted Caseloads Making judgements Enforcement when needed Publishing our findings Ongoing monitoring More manageable On the 5 key questions Commitment to taking firm action Clearer reports Better information 7

Timetable

Oct 2013 – March 2014

Co-production and development to shape consultation proposals

April 2014

Consultation on regulatory approach, ratings and guidance

April – May 2014

Wave 1 pilot inspections

June 2014

refined.

Oct 2014 4 June: Consultation closes

Evaluation; guidance and standards

July – Sept 2014

Wave 2 pilot inspections and initial ratings of some services New approach fully implemented and indicative ratings confirmed

March 2016

Every adult social care service rated 8

Inspection principles

9

What will be different?

Intelligent monitoring

Provider information return Questionnaires – community services Sharing information with external partners

Inspections

6 months – 2 years Tailored inspection teams Increased use of experts Experts by Experience Specialist Advisors 10

Our key questions and key lines of enquiry

We will no longer focus solely on whether providers are compliant or non-compliant with regulations Our focus is on the five key questions about services: Is it safe?

Is it effective?

Is it caring?

Is it responsive?

Is it well-led?

11

Principles for our key lines of enquiry

For each of the five key questions there are mandatory key lines of enquiry There will be additional key lines of enquiry based on: An inspector’s knowledge of the service Information available The inspectors professional judgement They support consistency of what we examine under the five key questions and focus on those areas that matter most Key lines of enquiry are supported by guidance on the ‘key things to consider’ as part of the assessment – these are called prompts 12

Safe

By safe, we mean

that people are protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

In adult social care, this means that people are supported to make choices and take risks and are protected from physical, psychological or emotional harm; abuse, discrimination and neglect.

Key line of enquiry example:

How are people protected from bullying, harassment, avoidable harm, abuse and breaches of their human rights?

13

Effective

By effective, we mean

that people’s care, treatment and support achieves good outcomes, promotes a good quality of life and is based on the best available evidence.

In adult social care, this means that people are supported to live their lives in the way they choose and experience the best possible health and quality of life outcomes.

Key line of enquiry example:

How are people’s needs and choices for care, treatment and support met?

14

Caring

By caring, we mean

that staff involve and treat people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

In adult social care, this means that people, their families and carers experience care that is empowering and provided by staff who treat people with dignity, respect and compassion.

Key line of enquiry example:

How are positive, caring relationships developed with people using the service?

15

Responsive

By responsive, we mean that

services are organised so that they meet people’s needs.

In adult social care, this means that people get the care they need, are listened to and have their rights and diverse circumstances respected.

Key line of enquiry example:

How do people receive personalised care that is responsive to their needs?

16

Well-led

By well-led, we mean that

the leadership, management and governance of the organisation assure the delivery of high-quality care, supports learning and innovation, and promotes an open and fair culture.

In adult social care, this means that people get the care they need, are listened to and have their rights and diverse circumstances respected.

Key line of enquiry example:

How does the service promote a positive culture that is person centred, open, inclusive and empowering?

17

Ratings

18

Four point scale

High level characteristics of each rating level

Innovative, creative, constantly striving to improve, open and transparent Consistent level of service people have a right to expect, robust arrangements in place for when things do go wrong May have elements of good practice but inconsistent, potential or actual risk, inconsistent responses when things go wrong Severe harm has or is likely to occur, shortfalls in practice, ineffective or no action taken to put things right or improve 19

How key lines of enquiry and evidence build towards ratings

Define the questions to answer

Key lines of enquiry (mandatory plus additional KLOEs identified from information held)

Gather and record evidence from all sources

Intelligent monitoring and local information On-site inspection Pre inspection information gathering Speak to staff and people using the service

Make judgements and build ratings

Apply consistent principles, build ratings from the recorded evidence

Write report and publish alongside ratings

Outstanding Good Requires improvement Inadequate 20

How do we decide a rating?

21

To what do we give ratings?

Services will be rated at two levels: level one - we will use our rating methodology and professional judgement to produce separate ratings for each of the five key questions level two - we will aggregate these separate ratings up to an overall location rating using ‘ratings principles’ 22

Principles

The five key questions contribute equally to the overall location rating. Overall ratings are produced using the following principles: If two or more of the key questions are rated ‘inadequate’, then the overall rating will normally be ‘inadequate’ If one of the key questions is rated ‘inadequate’, then the overall rating will normally be ‘requires improvement’ If two or more of the key questions are rated ‘requires improvement ’, then the overall rating will normally be ‘requires improvement’ At least two of the five key questions would normally need to be rated ‘outstanding’ before an overall rating of ‘outstanding’ can be awarded 23

Rating limiters

24

Other ways to share your views

Consultation: 9 April to 4 June 2014

Get involved:

Web form at

www.cqc.org.uk

Twitter

@CareQualityComm

Email

[email protected]

Provider online community: join at

www.cqc.org.uk

25

www.cqc.org.uk

Thank you

26