Oregon - Gaming Standards Association
Download
Report
Transcript Oregon - Gaming Standards Association
Annual Meeting 2011
AGENDA
FINANCIAL REPORT
2011 ACHIEVEMENTS
Standards Update
OAC
CIC
KEYNOTE
PLATINUM MEMBERS
MISSION STATEMENT
The Gaming Standards Association (GSA) is an international trade
association that creates benefits for gaming manufacturers,
suppliers,
operators and regulators.
We facilitate the identification, definition,
development, promotion and implementation of open standards to
enable
innovation, education, and communication for the benefit of the
entire
industry.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2011
Lyle Bell
Adrian Marcu
Rick Gilhuly
Tom Beauchamp
Seminole Tribe of Florida
IGT
Manitoba Lotteries
Chairman
Vice – Chair
Secretary
Penn National Gaming
Treasurer
Jim Morrow
Aristocrat Technologies
Walt Eisele
Bally Technology
Melissa Price
Caesars Entertainment
Jeanne-Marie Wilkins Isle of Capri
Steve Sutherland
Bob McKenzie
MEI
Don Doucet
SPIELO
Marc Pace
WMS Gaming
Konami Gaming
Tom Beauchamp - Treasurer
FINANCIAL REPORT
FINANCIALS
2011 Projected vs. Budget
2011 (projected)
2011 (budget)
Variance
Revenues
$ 1,421,623
$ 2,084,850
(32%)
Expenses
($ 1,594,176)
($2,148,768)
(26%)
Net
($
172,553)
($
Equity/Cash
$
98,343
$
63,918)
206,978
(179%)
(53%)
FINANCIALS
2012 Budget vs. 2011 Projected
2012 (budget)
2011 (projected)
Variance
Revenues
$1,686,200
$1,421,623
19%
Expenses
($1,575,716)
($1,594,176)
(1%)
Net
$
($ 172,553)
164%
Equity/Cash
$ 208,828
110,484
$
98,343
112%
Peter DeRaedt - President
2011 ACHIEVEMENTS
ORGANIZATION
Reorganized GSA
Streamlined policies
Enhanced membership value
Providing members with R&D and operations advantage over
competitors
Providing members more control as they are directly invested
Exclusive for members
Standards
Certification
Manufacturer ID code
Reassessment of membership benefits
Introduction of Bronze membership level
MEMBERSHIP & CERTIFICATION
Certification requires membership
To participate in fault reporting and resolution processes
To get access to critical updates (technical bulletins)
Lose product certification when membership lapses
Manufacturer ID (MID) code given to members only
Issued by GSA to one company only for its sole and exclusive use
May not be sold, transferred or used by others
Unauthorized use is strictly forbidden
Termination of membership will lead to revocation of MID
Industry created and managed test scripts
EDUCATION
Canada
South America
Europe
Asia
Growing government interest
Austria
Greece
South Australia
GSA available to provide information and education
Ethan Tower – Director Standards Development
STANDARDS REALIGMENT
STANDARDS UPDATE
December – Serial GAT 3.50 released.
Clearly defined the implementation and certification requirements for
Serial GAT.
February – S2S 1.5 released.
Resolved long-standing ambiguities in S2S communications and took
the first steps in aligning S2S with G2S.
March – G2S 1.1 released.
Consolidated clarifications and corrections to G2S 1.0. Clearly
established the core requirements for G2S implementations.
May – Serial GAT 4.0 completed and member ratification
process started.
Includes authentication of peripheral devices such as note acceptors
and printers.
STANDARDS UPDATE
July – GDS 1.2 completed and member ratification process
started.
Includes clarifications and corrections to GDS 1.1. Adds full multi-lingual
support and 2-D barcode support.
August – S2S 1.6 completed and member ratification process
started.
Includes enhanced download and GAT support plus alignment of player
tracking with G2S.
August – G2S 2.1 completed and member ratification process
started.
Include various OAC extensions, manufacturer extensions, and other
significant functionality improvements.
October – Planned release of Serial GAT 4.0.
Year-End – Planned release of GDS 1.2, S2S 1.6, and G2S 2.1.
GSA STANDARDS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND READY FOR
Paul DiGrazia – Chair of the Certification and Interoperability
Committee
CIC
CERTIFICATION & INTEROPERABILITY
COMMITTEE
Charter
Drive guidelines to enable interoperable business solutions
Define, manage & promote GSA certification program
Accomplishments
Developed initial proposal for common set of GSA test scripts
Created interoperability testing framework & templates
Next Steps
Finalize approach & timeline for creating GSA test scripts
Plot new GSA interoperability assets for upcoming projects
GSA CERTIFICATION VS.
GSA COMPLIANT VS.
INTEROPERABILITY
GSA Certification
Vendor compliance to GSA Certification Guide
GSA approved lab certifies vendor implementation
GSA Compliant
Vendor protocol implemented per GSA standards
Protocol implementation NOT certified by GSA approved lab
Interoperability
Ability to operate in a multi-vendor gaming environment
Focused on vendor ability to deliver end-to-end, product level, business
solutions
VALUE OF GSA CERTIFICATION
Operator
Provides industry foundation for innovative gaming concepts to drive
coin in
Strategic component in making purchase decisions
Improve Operator’s product acceptance testing process
Vendor
Pre-requisite for providing reliable, interoperable gaming content
Reduce costs & time to market associated with developing multi-vendor,
interoperable solutions
Eventual industry interoperability requirement
ACCELERATING GSA CERTIFICATION
Operator adoption of Interoperable network products
GSA Certification needs to be an open book test:
GSA Certification & Interoperability Committee (CIC) developing
common set of test scripts for the industry to ensure consistency of
certification
Reduces vendor costs for achieving & maintaining GSA Certification
Industry certification focus remains GSA standards G2S v2.1
for the near term
Muriel Grimble – Executive Director Gaming Products and Services
AGLC
Carol Hardy – Assistant Director Marketing Oregon Lottery
Jim Lightbody – VP Casino and Community Gaming BCLC
KEYNOTE
Evolution of the GSA
Keynote 2011
October 5, 2011
Muriel Grimble
Why are we Here?
Muriel Grimble
Executive Director, Gaming Products and Services
Been with AGLC for 25 years growing the business from a
small instant lottery ticket market to a multiple channel
enterprise gaming jurisdiction
Responsible for the strategic direction and development of
Alberta’s $1.5 billion Gaming Business:
25 casinos and 3 Racing Entertainment centers
6000 Video Lottery Terminals
Electronic Bingo
Ticket Lottery
Co- Chair of Canadian Cross Country Working Group (Oregon)
Jim Lightbody
Vice-President, Casino and Community Gaming
BCLC since 2001 - VP of Lottery Gaming
Helped transform and grow the lottery business through
increased focus on channel partner relationships, data
analytics, marketing, product development and overall
customer centricity
Serves as VP of Casino, Casino and Community Gaming
responsible for the strategic direction and business
development for:
17 casino’s
12 community gaming centre’s and
a $1.6 billion line of business
Carole Hardy
Assistant Director, Marketing
Been in the gaming industry since the late 1980s
Responsible for the product development and management of a
portfolio of seven traditional product lines and Video Lottery
Products
A $1.04B business
Responsible for market research and sales analysis, corporate
advertising and Internet Marketing programs
Chair of the Oregon Council on Problem Gambling
Avid supporter of Oregon’s role in the GSA
AGENDA
Operator Vision for the GSA
BCLC Jurisdictional Overview
Oregon Jurisdictional Overview
Alberta Jurisdictional Overview
Next Steps
Summary
Q&A
Operator Vision for the GSA
Why are standards so important to us?
Standardization is central to our strategy of providing
customers with the products they want, and when and where
they want them
Standards are critical to interoperability and improved time to
market of gaming products
Interoperability is also critical to our strategy of implementing
Best of Breed solutions
Lower product cost, decreased customization
Helps to facilitate the convergence of across gaming
businesses
How has the GSA/OAC Relationship
Supported our Business Strategy to date?
Protocols
Full featured, non-proprietary gaming protocols (G2S, S2S,
GDS)
G2S as Wide Area Protocol
Standards
PUI – Player User Interface
Responsible Gaming
Interoperability and Certification (current focus)
Workgroup efforts on Internet Gaming (current focus)
GSA Current State
High percentage Vendor representation on board
Effective Operators Advisory Committee
Active Certification development committee
Strong technical committees resourced by the Vendor
community
Third party labs active within the membership
Funding model based on tiered dues structure
Critical Success Moving Forward
Increased Operator Membership
Increased Operator Leadership
Aligns the GSA to market needs
Partnership with Regulators
Regulators recognize they can also benefit from standards
A group of forward thinking Regulators are working with the GSA
to identify regulatory areas that lend themselves to
standardization
Critical Success Moving Forward
Stabilized Funding
A new business model must be developed to sustain the GSA
Allows GSA to expand the scope of its Standardization initiatives
GSA must move to fulfill its broader standards
mandate and move beyond protocol standardization
to become a comprehensive standards organization
Our industry must continue to focus on those things that add
business value and standardize the plumbing
The Urgency
Although there are 3 jurisdictions here today, we are
a small representative group of a much larger
operator community aligned with this strategy.
The planning and research is over…
For the current suite of protocols
We are implementing strategies focused on the
principles of converging gaming businesses
BCLC Jurisdictional Overview
Gaming Management System
With a corporate objective of creating a player centric
company, BCLC must invest in infrastructure and technology
to support current operations and enable future growth.
It will enhance revenue, integrity of our operations, improve our
social responsibility in gaming facilities and deliver an
enhanced gambling experience to our current and future
players.
We will build public trust and support for BCLC gaming.
Trendlines
Operators are faced with rising cost of technology:
Operators cannot continue to spend more and more dollars on
integrating proprietary technology. We must maximize effective use of
limited budgets by leveraging standards with legacy systems and new
mobile platforms.
Having no standards results in:
Increased risk
Increased cost
Slower time to market
BCLC’s Vision:
Customer-centricity
Plug and Play capabilities
Best of breed
We want to be integrators of platform technologies: standards are a way
for BCLC to reach our vision while decreasing time to market.
Oregon Jurisdictional Overview
Oregon
Jurisdictional Overview
Oregon operates over 12,000 VLTs in a Wide Area Network consisting
of 2300 retail locations
In Fiscal Year 2011 Video Lottery generated over $720M in net sales
Today’s VLT network is comprised of products from 4 suppliers and
based on the proprietary DXS-4 protocol
Oregon’s #1 gaming initiative is to migrate from a proprietary Video
Lottery gaming product to one based on GSA standards by:
Implementing a G2S Central System
Deploying new VLTs based on G2S
Upgrading the WAN to Ethernet from Frame Relay
Installing Ethernet LAN wiring in 2300 retail locations
Oregon
Importance of Certification
Certification and Integration is crucial to Oregon’s plan to
migrate to a new generation VL product
Oregon’s vision for the future is that products based on GSA
protocols, standards and guidelines are tested, certified and
integrated at a base level before they are marketed to operators
We want more of a plug-n-play environment
As a standards organization the GSA must lead VLT and
system vendors towards product certification and
interoperability
Oregon
Technology Convergence
Oregon’s goal is to create a single view of the player
To continuously enhance the player experience with products, and
Improve our ability to interact with our players
Create games experiences that tap into social media
First leverage our current product portfolios
Play for fun games
Create loyalty
Oregon
Leveraging Our Current Products
Oregon
Technology Convergence
Backbone of responsible gambling
Future loyalty programs
Future gaming libraries
Vision is the PUI could provide Internet delivered game
content on VLTs or standalone devices
Need to develop standards to set the stage for US operators
as we venture into Internet, mobile and social gaming
Alberta Jurisdictional Overview
The Gaming End-State – 2018
“A player-centric gaming
experience that
encourages a healthy
balance between
sustaining revenue
and Responsible
Gambling,
and positions the AGLC
for the future.”
Gaming Program Phases
VLT System and Hardware Replacement
Project Update
Project
Status
Gaming Management
System
• Awarded- Spielo
Enterprise Service Bus
• Awarded- Software AG
Games Download and
Configuration
• Acquired functionality as
part of GMS- Spielo
Player User Interface
Platform and Player
Experience Management
• RFP issued Sept 16th.
Closes Oct 13th
VLT Replacement
• RFP closed Sept 16th
Telecommunication
Network
• Awarded- Telus
Gaming Program
Projected Timelines
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
VLT Modernization
Casino Modernization
Ticket Modernization
Bingo Modernization
Other Networks
2018
Operator - Next Steps
OAC members are purchasing and implementing systems
based on GSA standards
ALC
Alberta
BCLC
OLG
Oregon
Quebec
Coming soon: Manitoba and Saskatchewan
With Standardization, more is better. More operators
implementing standards means more vendors/products, more
cost effective delivery = more business value
The continued evolution of our business strategies depends on
standardization and partnership with the GSA is our obvious
choice
Keynote Summary
Standardization is central to our strategy of providing customers with
the products they want, and when and where they want them
Standards are a critical to interoperability and improved time to market
of gaming products
Interoperability also critical to our strategy of implementing Best of
Breed solutions
Lower product cost, decreased customization
Internet and mobile are becoming realities in our businesses. Need a
way to integrate these channels into on our legacy businesses
Helps to facilitate the convergence of across gaming businesses
Keynote Summary cont.
Investment in the GSA
We view the cost associated with developing standards as an
investment in achieving our business strategies not a cost
The governance of the GSA must evolve into a 3 way partnership of
Operators, Regulators and Manufacturers
Operators
Operator Initiatives
GSA
Manufacturers
Regulators
RECOGNITION
THANK YOU