Transcript 2013 HPS MCAS - Hingham Schools

MCAS REPORT
Spring 2013
Presented to the Hingham School Committee
November 18, 2013
by
Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent
OVERVIEW OF MCAS TESTS




Grades 3-8 and 10 – ELA and Math
Grades 4, 7 and 10 – Composition
Grades 5 and 8 – Science and Technology
Grades 9/10 – Science and Technology
(Biology and Chemistry)




Multiple Choice
Open Response
Short Answer
Writing Prompts
MCAS DATA
 Percentage of Students at Proficient/
Advanced Levels
 Composite Performance Index – CPI
(measure of progress toward 100%
proficient/advanced goal)
 Student Growth Percentile - SGP
(measure of progress in student performance
over previous year compared to academic
peers)
MCAS RESULTS
Percentage of Students at Proficient / Advanced Levels
2013
Grades 3, 4 and 5
Mass.
Hingham
Grade 3 Reading
57
77
Grade 3 Math
66
Grade 4 ELA
Mass.
Hingham
Grade 6 ELA
67
86
80
Grade 6 Math
61
83
53
81
Grade 7 ELA
72
96
Grade 4 Math
52
79
Grade 7 Math
52
73
Grade 5 ELA
66
86
Grade 8 ELA
78
94
Grade 5 Math
61
81
Grade 8 Math
55
82
Grade 5 Science
51
78
Grade 8 Science
39
58
Mass.
Hingham
Mass.
Hingham
Grade 10 ELA
91
100
ELA
69
88
Grade 10 Math
80
95
Math
61
81
Grade 10 Science
71
94
Science
53
75
Grade 10
Grades 6, 7 and 8
All Grades
MCAS RESULTS
Composite Performance Index Results (CPI)
2013
Grades 3, 4 and 5
Mass.
Hingham
Grade 3 Reading
83.3
92.6
Grade 3 Math
84.3
Grade 4 ELA
Grades 6, 7 and 8
Mass.
Hingham
Grade 6 ELA
85.1
94.8
92.4
Grade 6 Math
80.3
92.3
78.9
93.1
Grade 7 ELA
88.4
98.8
Grade 4 Math
80.2
92.6
Grade 7 Math
74.4
89.1
Grade 5 ELA
84.7
94.2
Grade 8 ELA
90.1
97.8
Grade 5 Math
80.6
91.9
Grade 8 Math
76.0
93.8
Grade 5 Science
78.5
91.6
Grade 8 Science
71.0
84.7
Grade 10
Mass.
Hingham
Mass.
Hingham
Grade 10 ELA
96.9
100
ELA
86.8
95.6
Grade 10 Math
90.2
98.1
Math
80.8
92.6
Grade 10 Science
88.0
98.1
Science
79.0
91.0
All Grades
MCAS RESULTS
Student Growth Percentile (SGP)
(Massachusetts 2013 Median Scores – 50th Percentile)
Grades 4 and 5
Hingham
Grades 6, 7 and 8
Hingham
Grade 4 ELA
64*
Grade 6 ELA
60*
Grade 4 Math
66*
Grade 6 Math
47
Grade 5 ELA
67*
Grade 7 ELA
64*
Grade 5 Math
64*
Grade 7 Math
47
Grade 8 ELA
47
Grade 8 Math
56.5
Grade 10
Hingham
All Grades
Hingham
ELA
68*
ELA
63*
Math
56.5
Math
57
* High SGP
Typical SGP
Low SGP
60 - 99
40 - 59
0 - 39
DISTRICT STRENGTHS
 Scores higher than state: percentage scoring
proficient/advanced and CPIs
 Highest scores: gr. 10 ELA, math and science;
gr. 6, 7 and 8 ELA and gr. 6 math; gr. 5 ELA
and math; gr. 4 ELA
 Highest CPIs: gr. 10 ELA, math and science;
gr. 6, 7, and 8 ELA; gr. 5 ELA
 Highest SGPs: gr. 10 ELA; gr. 6 and 7 ELA;
gr. 5 ELA and math; gr. 4 ELA and math
DISTRICT STRENGTHS
(continued)
 Increases in percentage at proficient/
advanced: gr. 10 ELA (100) and science; gr. 7
ELA; gr. 8 math; gr. 5 ELA; gr. 4 ELA and math
 Special education CPIs higher than state CPIs
 Gender CPIs similar
 Small range between elementary school
scores: gr. 3 reading; gr. 4 ELA and math
 High district state rankings: gr. 10 ELA and
science; gr. 7 ELA; gr. 4 ELA and math
DISTRICT CONCERNS
 Lowest score: gr. 8 science
 Lowest SGP: gr. 6 and 7 math and gr. 8
ELA below state SGP
 Lowest Special Education CPIs: gr. 3
math; gr. 6 and 7 math
 Large range between elementary
school scores: gr. 5 math and science
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT STEPS
 Analyze and monitor student performance results
 Implement intervention and challenge programs
 Implement state funded MCAS high school tutoring
programs
 Continue use of test taking and instructional strategies
 Align curriculum with Common Core State Standards
 Revise/update curriculum, as necessary
 Continue professional development programs
 Continue use of supervision and evaluation process
MASSACHUSETTS
ACCOUNTABILITY
REPORTS
HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS
DISTRICT
2013
MASSACHUSETTS
ACCOUNTABILTIY SYSTEM
 School Percentiles (1-99): Overall performance
compared to other schools with same grade span
 Accountability and Assistance Levels (1-5):
Level 1 – highest performing to Level 5 –
lowest performing – reported for all students and
high needs subgroup
 MCAS Participation: Minimum of 95% students
required (ELA, math, science)
MASSACHUSETTS
ACCOUNTABILTIY SYSTEM
 Annual Progress & Performance Index / PPI (0-100):
Measure of improvement toward indicator targets over
two years – target of 75+
 Cumulative Progress & Performance Index / CPPI
(0-100): Combination of assessment data including
indicators on performance and growth over last 4 years
– target of 75+
 CPPI Indicators: Narrowing proficiency gap (ELA,
math, science), growth (ELA & math), 10% increase
scoring advanced (ELA, math, science), 10% decrease
scoring warning/ failing (ELA, math, science), high
school only-graduation and drop out rates
HINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS
SCHOOL PERCENTILES






East School
Foster School
PRS
South School
HMS
HHS
88
88
98
90
89
94
HINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS
CUMULATIVE PROGRESS AND PERFORMANCE
INDEX AND STATE LEVELS
CPPI – TARGET 75
All
High Needs Levels
Students Students
1-5
EAST
FOSTER
92
97
47
86
2
1
PRS
100
74
2
SOUTH
HMS
98
90
63
73
2
2
HHS
100
89
1
HINGHAM
94
71
2
HINGHAM 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY
RESULTS
 School Percentiles – All Schools “Highest
Performing”
 CPPI – All Students – All Schools Exceeded
Target – High Levels of Progress
 CPPI – High Needs – Met Target/Level 1:
Foster and HHS
 CPPI – High Needs – Below Target/Level 2:
East, PRS, South and HMS
DESE REQUIREMENTS LEVEL 2 SCHOOLS
 Analyze “High Needs” data
 Review level of implementation of
“Conditions for School Effectiveness”
 Revise School Improvement Plans with
interventions and support strategies
 Disseminate DESE required Report Cards
to parents
 Prioritize Title I funding for Level 2 schools