EAE Model - Neuro ACF

Download Report

Transcript EAE Model - Neuro ACF

Stanford University Department of Comparative Medicine Developing Best Care Practices and Endpoint Guidelines for Rodent Models of Neurologic Disease Lisa Heath, DVM, DACLAM

Rodent Models

Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis

(EAE)

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)Huntington’s Disease

Guidelines and Endpoints Developing Guidelines

Resources

Working with Researchers

Multiple Sclerosis in People

Fatigue

Bowel/bladder dysfunction

Numbness

Cognitive dysfunction

Gait, balance, coordination problems

Pain

Multiple Sclerosis

Health.howstuffworks.com

Multiple Sclerosis

•http://www.elements4health.com/images/stories/conditions/myelin-sheath.jpg

EAE Models

Active EAE: immunized with myelin antigen or peptide emulsified in CFA

Monophasic or relapsing-remitting disease

Disease process commences 10-15 days post immunization

75-80% incidence of disease

EAE Models

Passive or adoptively transferred EAE: Recipient mice injected with activated, myelin-specific T cells (harvested from immunized donor mice)

Relapsing-remitting disease

EAE Guidelines Benchmarking

We benchmarked with other institutions to see if their IACUC had specific guidelines to cover EAE rodent models

64 institutions were surveyed regarding whether or not they had rodent EAE models

19 institutions responded

Survey Results Data and graphs courtesy of Sonja Wallace

EAE Benchmarking Survey

Breakdown of Respondents 5% 5% 11% 26% 53% University Biotech/Pharma Private Institution Government CRO

EAE Benchmarking Survey

IACUC Guidelines 6% 26% 68% Specific EAE Guideline Humane Endpoint Guideline No Guideline Specified

EAE Benchmarking Survey

% Weight Loss Endpoint

11% 5% 5% 5% 5% 69%

10% Loss 15% Loss 20% Loss 25% Loss 30% Loss Not Specified

EAE Benchmarking Survey

Separate Debilitated Animals

16% 21% 63%

Separate Don't Separate Not Specified

Summary

Majority of respondents had an IACUC guideline specifically for EAE models

Some respondents used their humane endpoint guideline for EAE models

Majority of respondents used 20% percent weight loss as an endpoint

Majority of respondents separated symptomatic from asymptomatic animals

Refining Guidelines

Intervention/Monitoring: When and how often

Nutrition and Hydration: What, when and how often

Include the Researchers

EAE Scoring

Score 0 = No overt signs of disease

Requirements: Label Special Request Card with “EAE Model” on Experimental Day 1

Baseline Body Weight recorded on Day 1

Assess and record scoring observations at least 3 times per week.

EAE Scoring

Score 1 = Limp tail, flaccidity of tail Requirements (same as for Score 0)

EAE Scoring

Score 2 = Paraparesis; limp tail and hindlimb weakness, waddling gait.

Provide gel pack and/or moistened food on cage floor, or other appropriate supplements.

Weigh and/or assess body condition score at least 3 times per week.

Tail Suspension Test A.

B.

Normal Plantar Reflex Hindlimb Clasping

Animal Welfare Information Center Bulletin, Winter 1999/2000, Vol. 10 No. 3-4

EAE Scoring Score 3 = Hindlimb paralysis. Total loss of moment in hindlimbs. Mouse moves itself with forelimbs.

Daily Scoring and monitoring.

Weigh and/or assess BCS at least once daily.

Assess hydration status (body weight and skin turgor).

Assess bladder for evidence of urinary retention. Express bladder as needed.

Provide fluid supplementation, SC or oral gavage.

EAE Scoring

Score 4: Subdivided into 4A and 4B (for guidelines only*)

4a = Hindlimb paralysis and mild forelimb weakness

4b. Hindlimb paralysis and moderate to severe forelimb paralysis; lateral recumbency.

EAE Scoring

Score 4b. Hindlimb paralysis and moderate to severe forelimb paresis; lateral recumbency.

Mice must be monitored at least twice daily for no more than 24 hours.

Any animal that does not remit to score 3 within the time frame must be euthanized.

EAE Scoring

Score 5 : Moribund, or complete hindlimb paralysis with moderate to severe forelimb paresis with no remittance after 24 hrs and intensive supportive care.

Euthanize immediately.

EAE Scoring

Any animal which loses >20% body weight or has a body condition score <2 must also be euthanized, regardless of EAE score.

A Sidenote on Body Weight Recording

Each mouse’s body weight data is unique

No averages!

Data recording: pre-disease weight and pre-calculated 20% loss cut-off

EAE Scoring: Mouse Posture

0 : Tail has tone.

1: Tail no longer stands up, loss of tail tone. Walks normally.

2: Limp tail, hindlimb dysfunction.

3: No longer holds onto underside of cagelid with hindlimbs. Moves hindlimbs.

Current Protocols in Neuroscience

4: Hindlimbs drag behind, not used for movement.

EAE Scoring

Models of Multiple Sclerosis. ACNR. Vol 6. No 6. 2007

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Fatal neurodegenerative disease

Familial and Sporadic

Lou Gehrig’s Disease Loss of upper and lower motor neurons

Paralysis of muscles

www.alsa.org

ALS Models

SOD1 mice

ALS Mouse Models

Muscle atrophy

Weight loss

Limb weakness and paralysis

Oral and pharyngeal dysphagia

Respiratory weakness and paralysis

ALS Scoring System

Score of 0 Full extension of hind legs away from lateral midline when mouse is suspended by its tail, and mouse can hold this for two seconds, suspended two or three times. Score of 1 Collapse or partial collapse of leg extension towards lateral midline (weakness) or trembling of hind legs during tail suspension. Score of 2 Toes curl under at least twice during walking of 12 inches, or any part of foot is dragging along cage bottom/table.* Score of 3 Rigid paralysis or minimal joint movement, foot not being used for generating forward motion.

Score of 4 Mouse cannot right itself within 30 seconds after being placed on either side. Working with ALS Mice: Guidelines for preclinical testing & colony management. The Jackson Laboratory

ALS Scoring System

*If one hind leg is scored as 2, food pellets are left on bedding.

If both hind legs are scored as 2, Nutra-Gel is provided as food in addition to food pellets on bedding and a long sipper tube is placed on the water bottle.

Working with ALS Mice: Guidelines for preclinical testing & colony management. The Jackson Laboratory

ALS Scoring System:

:

8 Point Scale

CS 0 CS 1 CS1.5

No evidence of disease Shaking or splaying of hind legs when suspended by tail Weakness in one hind leg CS2* Change in gait (used as disease onset when attained on two consecutive days *disease onset CS 2.5 Extreme weakness in one hind leg (inability to dorsiflex) CS 3 CS 3.5

Extreme weakness in both hind leg Functional paralysis in one hind leg Solomon, et.al. One Universal Common Endpoint in Mouse Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. June 2011, vol. 6, issue 6.

Endpoint Scoring for ALS: 8 Point Scale

CS4 Both hind legs functionally paralyzed CS4+ CS5 CS4 plus the earliest time mice attained one of the following: a) weight loss > 20% vs. body weight immediately prior to a clinical score of 2* b) weight loss > 20% vs. peak body weight c) body condition score <2 d) righting reflex > 20s (clinical score of 5) CS 4 plus a righting reflex >20s

Huntington’s Disease

Huntington’s Disease Scoring: Part 1

Score of 0 Normal Score of 1 Clasps hind limbs within 30s of being suspended Score of 2 Clasps hind limbs within 5s but recovers quickly after 30s Score of 3 Clasps hind limbs within 5s, difficulty recovering when released after 30s

Auerbach, et.al. Human Molecular Genetics, 2001, Vol. 10, No. 22.

Huntington’s Disease Scoring: Movement Abnormalities

Tail stiffness or paralysis

Hind-limb stiffness or paralysis

Reduced left-right alteration of hindlimbs (“hopping”)

Resting tremors

Difficulties walking after handling

Seizure-like episodes

Huntington’s Disease Scoring: Part 2

Score of 0 Normal Score of 1 One movement abnormality Score of 2 Two movement abnormalities Score of 3 Three movement abnormalities

Huntington’s Disease Scoring: Combining Part 1 and 2

Scores range from 0:0 (normal, no disease) to 3:3 (greatest expression of clinical signs)

Choose score/score combinations for adding care :

food and water accessibility, supplements

heat source, nesting materials

Huntington’s Disease

Reference:

Guyenet, et.al. (2010). A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia. JoVE. 39. ID 1787. Tests: ledge test, hindlimb clasping, gait, kyphosis

Huntington’s Disease

Noise sensitivity: construction, cage changes, hoods and ventilation

Seizure-like activity and deaths related to noise and other disturbances

Hypothermia in late stage disease: external heat source; nestlets vs. paper nesting material Enviro dri®

(Shepherd Specialty Papers) www.ssponline.com

Summary

Meet with investigators: look at their scoring and weight data

Provide specific solutions and options

Include investigators on guidelines development