Transcript Towards a ANZ Hip Fracture Registry *Quality Care Costs Less
Towards a ANZ Hip Fracture Registry
“Quality Care Costs Less”
Hip fractures due to falls Males and females, Australia 1999-2007 Males Females 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1999–00 2000–01 2001–02 2002–03 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 2006–07 Year of separation
Source: Bradley C. 2011. Hospitalisations due to falls by older people, Australia 2006–07. Injury research and statistics series no. 56. Cat. no. INJCAT 132. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
Fragility hip fracture rates by year, WA, 1999-2009 Average yearly change: Indigenous, +6.9% (95%CI 2-12%) vs non-Indigenous, -3.6% (95%CI 3-4%)
Falls and fracture care and prevention A road map for a systematic approach Stepwise implementation based on size of impact Hip fracture patients Non-hip fragility fracture patients Individuals at high risk of 1 st fragility fracture or other injurious falls Objective 1:
Improve outcomes and improve efficiency of care after hip fractures
Objective 2:
Respond to the first fracture, prevent the second – through
Fracture Liaison Services
in acute and primary care
Objective 3:
Early intervention to restore independence – through
falls care pathway
linking acute and urgent care services to secondary falls prevention
Older people Objective 4:
Prevent frailty, preserve bone health, reduce accidents – through preserving physical activity, healthy lifestyles and reducing environmental hazards 1. DH Prevention Package for Older People
Falls and fracture care and prevention A road map for a systematic approach Stepwise implementation based on size of impact Hip fracture patients High volume, high cost Evidence around model/s of care Evidence of clinical variation in practice Evidence of sub-optimal care Evidence that data can be used to drive change Non-hip fragility fracture patients Objective 2:
Respond to the first fracture, prevent the second – through
Fracture Liaison Services
in acute and primary care
Individuals at high risk of 1 st fragility fracture or other injurious falls Objective 3:
Early intervention to restore independence – through
falls care pathway
linking acute and urgent care services to secondary falls prevention
Older people Objective 4:
Prevent frailty, preserve bone health, reduce accidents – through preserving physical activity, healthy lifestyles and reducing environmental hazards 1. DH Prevention Package for Older People
Inter-professional collaboration 2004-2007
Six Blue Book standards – monitored by NHFD
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
All patients with hip fracture should be admitted to an acute orthopaedic ward within
4 hours of presentation
All patients with hip fracture if medically fit should have
surgery within 48 hours
of admission, during normal working hours All patients with hip fracture should be assessed and cared for to
minimise risk of a pressure ulcer
All patients presenting with a fragility fracture should be managed on an orthopaedic ward with
routine access to orthogeriatric medical support from admission
All fragility fracture patients should be assessed for need of
antiresorptive therapy
to prevent future osteoporotic fractures All fragility fracture patients should be offered multidisciplinary assessment and intervention
to prevent future falls
UK NHFD Reports: 2008-2011
2011 - ALL eligible hospitals registered 191/191 Individual reports for 26 hospitals Analysis on 12,983 records from 64 hospitals Analysis on 36,556 records from 129 hospitals Analysis on 53,443 records from 176 hospitals
2011 National Hip Fracture Database Report Key metrics
Surgery within 36 hours Pre-op medical assessment Acute Length of Stay NHFD 2011 National Report. Available from www.nhfd.co.uk
Three-year trend data: 30,022 patients from 28 hospitals
Binomial test p-value <0.001 for all trends; average mortality at 30 days fell from 9.4% to 8%.
National Steering Group States and Territories LHDs Hospitals Registry National Guidelines Quality Indicators Consumer Manifesto Policy Models of Care Safety & Quality System Redesign Training / Education Resourcing models of care Local training / support Implementing best practice Measuring performance
National Hip Fracture Database
• Employs 4 people and now funded by DOH • Now has got 189 of 191 hospitals sending data (England, Wales, Northern Ireland) • Annual reporting since 2008 – 2008: ? patients from 26 hospitals – 2009: 12,983 patients from 64 hospitals – 2010: 36,556 patients from 129 hospitals – 2011: 56,000 patients from 176 hospitals
82% of predicted hip fractures
National Hip Fracture Database
• Total hip fracture records = 137,933 – Reports process indicators and case-mix adjusted outcomes (e.g. 30 day mortality) – All hospitals identified in reports
Best Practice Tariff
Best Practice Tariff
• Aims – To reduce unexplained variation in quality – To universalise best practice • Key indicators – Surgery within 36 hours – Involvement of Geriatricians • Balanced Scorecard for Hip Fractures
BPT - Payment
• All criteria must be met • Tariff – Reduced previous average payment by 10% – If criteria met – get old payment + extra – Extra = £445 • If doing 300 / yr = £134,000 = $270,000 per yr • From 2011: £890 = £267,000 = $530,000 per yr • Enough to allow investment in change, improvement and data collection
How System Works
Notify BPT compliance National Hip Fracture Database Commissioners Provide NHI and individual patient data Local Hospital Pay additional funds quarterly
Importance of “trust” in each segment of system
So why have a registry?
• • • • • •
Improve patient outcomes
–
Death, dependency and institutionalisation Safety and quality
–
e.g. timely and appropriate interventions Reduce inequalities
–
Local organisational, rural remote Driver for organisational change Use the data to shape practice Undertake additional research
Australia and New Zealand Hip Fracture Database
• • Inaugural Meeting October 2011 • Working Group Established • • Strong support from HQSC – NZ & Aust Professional Societies OA NZ & Aust
Progress with a National Registry
• • • • • • Auditing at facility level – NSW, NZ, WA Piloting at patient level in NSW WA/CMDHB have started electronic database Guidelines and quality indicators to be completed in 2012 Consumer manifesto – 2012 Conversations re build and operation of a national database
Progress
• • NZ Workshop planned May 2012 led by HQSC, NZ with NZ stakeholders participating (ACC, MOH, NHB, IT board, CNBU)
• Thank you