Overviwe_of_b-tagging_meetings
Download
Report
Transcript Overviwe_of_b-tagging_meetings
B-tagging meeting overview
Li bo
Shandong University
1
outline
Purpose
information on b-tagging studying
The b-tagging meetings mainly deal with
Trigger studies for b jets
The performance of b-tagging
B-tagging calibration
The validation of software release
2
The trigger study for b-jets
Correlation of b-jet trigger at L2/EF
with offline b-tagging
Various b-jet triggers
rate reduction
3
Correlation with offline taggers
Aims at offline Єb
=60%
The plot shows the
working points of L2
and EF are ~78% and
~68%
4
Rate reduction of different b-jet triggers
The rate reduction is almost constant with different Pt
5
The b-tagging performance
The b-tagging performance
b-tagging efficiency
rejection of light/c/tau jet
Study on b-tagging performance
1 Studies for the various jet algorithms
2 Impact from vertex reconstruction
3 Impact from tracking performance
4 Measurement of mistag-rate
5 Misalignment
6
1 Studies for the various jet algorithms
Requirement that jet has more than one track makes b
tagging procedure more robust against jet reconstruction
algorithms
7
2 Impact from primary vertex reconstruction
Sources
of impacts:
PV reconstruction efficiencies
PV resolutions
Pile up
8
9
2 Impact of Secondary vertex reconstruction on b-tagging
2 Impact from secondary vertex reconstruction
Source
of impacts:
SV reconstruction efficiencies
SV reconstruction fake rate
SV resolution
10
Impact on b-tagging
11
3 Impact from tracking performance
Sources
of impacts:
impact parameter resolution
tracking efficiency and fake rate
12
Impact on b-tagging performance
13
Mis-tagging rate
4 4Mis-tagging
Definition:
the ratio between the number of light jets
tagged as b-jet and the number of light jets
Sources leading to mis-tagging:
finite resolution of the reconstructed
track/vertex parameters
Tracks/vertices from the long-live particles
that decay in jets.
14
Measurement Method:
1.
2.
3.
4.
taking negative weight of all jets
inverting to positive to reperesent positive
weight distribution of light jets
measure the mis-tagging rate
with MC, correction for the long-live meson
presence in the light jet and heavy flavor jet
contribution.
Other method: using templates
15
Result of mistag rate
The measured mistag rate is almost close to the actual mistag rate
16
5 Mis-alignment
Misalignment
sets:
Random 10
Random 5
17
18
19
20
The b-tagging calibration
Purpose:
develop methods to get b-tagging efficiency with data
Method:
using di-jet events
Pt-rel
System 8
using ttbar events
Tag couting
Control sample
21
Dijet event
Pt-rel
method
Muons in μ-jet have
different Pt distributions
w.r.t jet axis originating
from different flavor q/g
use templates for b, c
and light jets to determine
their relative fractions
22
Pt-rel method
Fraction of b-jets can be extracted
from fitting to templates, before
tagging (Fb ->u) and atfer tagging
(Ftag b->u)
F tag b u
efficiency calculated as
23
System 8 method
Two sample with different
heavy flavor content
Two independent taggers
Apply taggers to both
samples
jets passing two taggers
both
Write a system of 8
equations to solve the
tagging efficiency
24
Pt-rel
System8
both methods have good result up to 80Gev(jet Pt )
improvements to system 8 method:
use different release like r13 : improvements to performance of taggers
use different samples and taggers
25
Using ttbar event
count number of events with
1,2,3 b-tags(lepton+jet) or 1,2
b-tags (delepton)
likelihood fit gives b-tag
efficiency
26
ttbar results
27
Methods for b-jet sample selection
topological
reconstruct all combinations, apply mass windows
kinematic
apply kinematic fit assuming mbjj and mblv=mtop, and
select combination with best fit x2
likelihood
use jet/lepton energy and angular information
28
29
B-tagging validation
30
31
Summary
The studies for b-jet triggers
The studies for b-tagging performance
the impact of vertex and tracking on b-jet performance
the measurement of mistagging rate
misalignment and error scaling
The studies of b-tagging calibration
measurement of b-tagging efficiency with di-jet and ttbar event
b-jet sample selection with three methods
32