Olecranon fraktur

Download Report

Transcript Olecranon fraktur

Olecranon fracture

Lonnie Froberg, MD, Ph.D

Odense University Hospital

     20% of forearm fracture 12 per 100.000 persons per year Low-energy fall Increased risk >50 years 90% AO 21.B1.1

 Duckworth et al. Injury 2012;43:343-346

    Why operate?

Methods of fixation – K-wire, cerklage – Plating Outcome Summary

Why operate?

     Restore articular surface Achieve absolute stability Commence early active movement Preservation of range of motion and power Avoidance of complications

Methods of fixation?

Methods of fixation?

   Cadaveric elbow joint Standard osteotomies Five different fixation techniques   Loads applied comparable to clinical situations Displacements measured Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br).1985. 67B;3:367-372

Methods of fixation?

Fracture type

Transverse Oblique Comminuted

Fixation technique

Tension band 1.0 mm, 1 knot, K-wire 2.0 mm Tension band 1.0 mm, 2 knots, K-wire 2.0 mm Tubular plate Cancellous screw, washer Cancellous screw, washer, tension band Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985. 67B;3:367-372

Methods of fixation?

Fracture type Fixation technique

Transverse Oblique Comminuted Tension band, 2 knots Tension band, 2 knots or tubular plate Tubular plate Fyfe et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1985. 67B;3:367-372

K-wire and cerklage

K-wire with or without eyelets?

 No significant difference in postoperative pain or in rate of hard ware removal Kim et al. J Hand Surg Am. 2013.Jul 9

How to place the K-wires?

   Proximal ulnar canal?

Anterior cortex?

Distal ulnar canal?

Huang et al. J Trauma. 2010.68;1:173-176

How to place the K-wires?

Average follow up/months Symptomatic implant removal Proximal migration of K wire/mm Satisfactory functionel outcome Proximal ulnar (n=24) 34.5 s.d 7.2

8 (33%) *p=0.03

4.08 s.d. 1.89

*p=0.001

21 (88%) Anterior cortex (n=28) 34.0 s.d 5.9

3 (11%) 1.53 s.d 0.56

26 (93%) Distal ulnar (n=26) 29.6 s.d 7.2

2 (8%) 1.31 s.d 0.54

26 (100%)

How to place the K-wires?

    Inserted as close as possible to the articular surface Back 1 cm from final position, cut obliquely, bent Incisions with lines in triceps K-wires are impacted into ulna Newman et al. 2009. Injury; 40(6): 575-581

How to place the K-wires?

 K-wire penetration more than 10 mm beyond the anterior cortex increases risk for penetration of median nerve and ulnar artery Prayson et al. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008.17;1:121-125

Which kind of tension band?

Failure (> 2 mm movement across osteotomy) Compression Stainless steel wire 0% 71% Ethibond No. 2 Ethibond No. 5 Fiber wire 100% 40% 0% 66% 40% 43% Lalliss et al. Jour Bone Joint Surg (Br).2010.92B;2:315-319

Plating

Plating

 When to plate?

– Tension band is not appropriate – Oblique fractures distal to the midpoint of the troclear notch – Co-existing coronoid fracture – Associated with Monteggia fracture dislocation Newman et al. 2009. Injury; 40(6): 575-581

Which kind of plate?

  Cadaveric study Comminute fracture  No difference in failure rate (>2 mm gap of fracture) Buijze et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2010;130:459-464

Which kind of plate?

 Advantage of locking compression plate to conventionel plate: – Angular and axial stability – Preserves periosteal blood supply – No toggling of unlocked screws (improves fixation in osteoporotic fractures and comminution)

Which kind of plate?

 Stainless steel or titanium?

 More screw in proximal fragment better than fewer screws?

 Larger screws better than small screws?

Which kind of plate?

 Accumed stainless stell  Synthes stainless stell  Synthes titanium  US Implants  Zimmer

Which kind of plate?

 No statistical difference between maximum load and cycles survived  Edwards et al. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25(5):306-311

Outcome – Cochrane review

Pain Motion compared to non-affected arm Radiographic evaluation Short term (2-3 years) *only plate fixation 1 (VAS score) Decreased supination 8% OA Long-term (15-25 years) 6% severe daily symptoms Decreased flexion and extension (5 degrees) 5% OA 1% non-union Patient-rated outcome 9.7

(VAS score) Veillette et al. Orthop Clin N Am. 2008;39:229-236 96% excellent or good

Summary – Tension band fixation

    Fracture: Transverse or oblique K-wire: Anterior cortex or distal ulnar canal K-wire penetration: <10 mm beyond the anterior cortex Tension band: 1.0 mm stainless steel wire, 2 knots

Summary - Plating

 Fractures: Distal to the midpoint of the troclear notch, co-existing coronoid fracture, Monteggia  Locking compression plate theoretically superior to conventionel plate

Thank you

Technique

Technique

Technique