Sigor Corporations

Download Report

Transcript Sigor Corporations

Sigor Corporation
Sigor Corporation is seeking to sell its services on
wider scale to increase company's profit and
contribute to the effort to lower gasoline prices by
lowering the cost of oil and gas extraction and
increasing over-all productivity of oil and gas
wells.
History
Sigor Corporation was established in 1991 by
Igor Skakovsky, the current President/CEO, as
an analytical laboratory for applied sciences,
technologies transfer and its management.
During the period from October, 2000 through
October, 2003 Company transformed itself into
worlds pioneering R&D laboratory in rock
mechanics and provider of innovative well
stimulation services.
History
In 2003, after series of Company’s successful
laboratorial tests, plus production stimulation of
103 oil, gas and irrigation wells, Sigor Corporation
acquired 40 years worth of technical data with
agreement of scientific support from its Ukrainian
collaborators.
Same year Sigor Corporation began
commercialization of developed technology by
marketing its services under Trademark of
SWTorpedoTM.
Company Today
Sigor Corporation's high quality well stimulation
services SWTorpedoTM (Shock Waves Torpedo)
offers cost-effective recovery of hydrocarbon by
providing significant, stable-over-time spatial
changes in the rock permeability and predictable
increase in productivity for more then 300%.
Company Today
As all members of SWTorpedoTM family
SWT-GUARANT, SWT-OPTIMUM and SWT-ECONOM
uses dilatant technology and is designed
individually for each well to increase permeability
of the producing interval.
SWT-OPTIMUM service saved over USD 20,000
when stimulating limestone of the open-hole gas
well Asher #8 in Bell County, Kentucky.
Producer-Anderson Oil Ltd,.
Fundamentals of Dilatant Technology
Dilatancy is a permanent deformation registered
in rocks that are subjected to non-uniform
dynamic stress. As the rock-volume changes,
porosity can increase up to 60% and permeability
increases 200% or more, as a result of the
microfracturing or cracking that have been
measured in laboratory experiments using core
samples and in the field tests by implementing
SWTorpedoTM services.
Dilatancy
Schema A: Granules of the sores rock before
stress.
Schema B: Rock-volume have changed under
dynamic stress.
Dilatancy
Dilatancy is the increase in volume of a granular
substance when its shape is changed, because of
greater distance between its component particles.
Dilatancy
Factors that affect deformation are:
 Dilatancy
 Grain crushing
 Size of the grain
 Thermal characteristics
 Spatial variations in bed strength
 Decoupling
The Tool
SWTorpedo Tool will be
designed using the rock’s
characteristics received
from the client by placing
high explosives strategically
in the tool and securing
appropriate timing for the
detonation of each charge.
Figure 2 Schematic view of internal design
Tool’s effect on the rock
High explosives such as TNT, HMX or RDX are
strategically placed in the Tool and detonated in rapid
succession to generate multiple shock waves that in
return creates changing in time stress state, which
approaching uniaxial compression and perfect shift.
At this point fast growing increase in volume of rock
can be observed, even though active forces are still
working in compressive regime.
Tool’s effect on the rock

Figure 1 Distinctive
characteristics of the dilatant
stress state created by
SWTorpedoTM during its
detonation.
The laboratorial and field experiments
confirm that dilatancy begins when
( =
  r
) < 0.1
Where:
Dotted line is progression of Dilatancy  and  =
 r is maximum principle stress
  is minimum principle stress
t, MC is time in micro seconds
Y-axis shows created pressure in Mega Pascal
  r
Tool’s effect on the rock
8
9
When Tool is detonated explosive forces create pressure of 10 ...10
МPa per second. Successive shock waves prolong the stress and
initiated fractures will be multiple. The area of Dilatancy or microfractures is on average 6 times larger than an area of radial fractures
How SWTorpedo is fielded?
1 Selected well must be shut in
and prepared in the same
manner as it would be for
perforation. That includes:
tubing and rod removal
2 Wireline truck with an
operating crew (electrical
wireline is required)
3 Depth of productive interval
which plan to be treated must
be confirm and cable-line
must be marked.
How SWTorpedo is fielded?
4 Water truck with and operating crew
To avoid stress on wireline, water, solution or other
fluid for depressing the well must be pumped in the
well up to at least 90 feet above the interval at which
Tool will be detonated. Concentration of the solution,
its level and/or water level in the well must be
calculated based on the pressure in the formation.
How SWTorpedo is fielded?
Reusable torpedo’s head
must be attached to a cable
head by the female adapter
with 1 7/16 in. thread
Tool-Head
How SWTorpedo is fielded?
Electrical detonator must
be wired and connected
to a detonative cord
SWTorpedo Tool with Attached Tool-Head
How SWTorpedo is fielded?
Connect SWTorpedo to its
reusable head and lower the
Tool to the mark on wireline
that being made earlier
Initiate detonation
SWTorpedo Tool Bottom view
Recovered Debris of SWTorpedo after
Successful Treatment
Prepare the well for exploitation
Preferable well's and rock's
characteristics
Preferable depth of producing interval for:
 Oil wells
up to 13,200ft
 Gas wells
up to 14,800ft
  3  20 md
  0.25
  3.5  106 Psi
Were:



-is Young’s modulus;
-is Poison’s ration;
-is permeability.
Highly compressible components
such as clay, loam, etc.  10%
Preferable rock's and well's
characteristics
Representative Characteristics
of the Formations Rock
1. Sandstone (strong and clean)
2. Sandstone (medium strength)
Limestone (strong and dense)
Dolomite
Granite
3. Shale (strong)
Dolomite, sandstone (weak)
Limestone (medium strength)
4. Shale (medium strength)
Sandstone (clayey)
Limestone (clayey)
Results of SWTorpedo
Stimulation
Best
Great
Very Good
Good
Preferable rock's and well's
characteristics
Representative Characteristics
of the Rock Formations
Results of SWTorpedo
Stimulation
5. Shale (weak with admixtures)
Sandstone (weak with admixtures)
6. Sandstone (weak with high moisture)
Shale (weak with high moisture)
Tuff
7. Coal (hard)
Shale (strong and/or with high moisture)
Tuff (low moisture)
Sulfuric ore (with no more than 30% of
sulfur)
Fare
Acceptable
Questionable
Competitive Advantages of
SWTorpedo
SWTorpedo vs. Common high-explosive





Effect of dilatancy creates not only macrodistraction but also micro-fractures that are
main contributors for increase of permeability
No compaction zone or cavity created
10 times less of explosives used for each
treatment
SWTorpedo can be used in cased wells
where casing is perforated
Easier and safer to handle
Competitive Advantages of
SWTorpedo
SWTorpedo vs. Propellant tools
 Each tool is designed individually to meet
specifics of producing formation
 Flat Fee for each type of services regardless of
the treated area
 Significantly higher rate of success in
sandstone, limestone and dolomites
 Initiates multiple fractures vs. 1 or 2 of two
directional fractures
 Applicable in shallow and under pressured
wells (only 90ft of fluid required above the tool)
 Results can be verified in 5 minutes vs. 30
minutes
Competitive Advantages of
SWTorpedo
SWTorpedo vs. Acidizing treatment
 Enhance acidizing by increasing area of acidrock contact when used prier to the acidizing
treatment
 Low risk of the well’s integrity
 Higher predictability of outcome
Competitive Advantages of
SWTorpedo
SWTorpedo vs. Hydraulic fracturing
 Adjustable vertical growth
 Multiple fractures
 For any wells aggregated permeability is
higher
 Significantly lower cost
 Equipment requirements are minimal
Competitive Advantages of
SWTorpedo
Distinctive Advantages
 SWTorpedo creates greater area of effective
micro-fractures than any of the existing techniques
can create by at least 20ft in each direction.
 Minimum production increase is agreed on and
approved by the Client prier to the treatment, and
will be delivered with 96% of success
 Fractured area is spherically shaped and connects
(net like) stratigraphic traps and productive
formations to the main producing interval.
 Range of effective micro-fractures can be adjusted
from 5 to 35ft for the cased wells, and from 5 to 54ft
for open-hole wells, limited control of vertical
fracture’s propagation is possible.
 Fractures are stable over time and its stability
varies from 4 to 12 years