Transcript Organizing Files for Performance
Organizing Files for Performance
Chapter 6 Jim Skon File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 1
Organizing Files for Performance
Data Compression Reclaiming space in files Fast Searching Keysorting File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 2
Data Compression
Making files
smaller
» » » Use less storage, save space Faster Transmission Processed faster Data Compression » » encoding information more efficiently Many techniques exist File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 3
Data Compression
Consider fields with fixed length or fixed set of values A binary representation can save space » » States - 50 states - 6 bits (one byte) Zip - 0 to 99999. 17 bits (three bytes) Called Compact Notation » Redundancy reduction File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 4
Data Compression
Cost of binary representations » » » file not readable as test Processing time for conversion All software must including appropriate/compatable encoding and decoding routines.
» Potential lost of flexibility File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 5
Data Compression
Suppressing repreating sequences » Consider a picture – Series of pixels - each a color – Colors represented by 8 bit value – usually come in bunches, e.g.
– 24 23 22 22 22 22 22 25 25 25 25 25 25 65 65 66 66 66 66 » Run length encoding – Represent long runs with a prefix (FF) follwed by count, followed by color – 24 23 FF 05 22 FF 06 25 65 65 FF 04 66 » Simple images would be small, busy images would be no bigger. File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 6
Data Compression
Assigning variable length codes » » Some codes are more likely then others Use shorter codes for often used values, longer ones for less used values.
» Each code must have the property of a unique prefix – No code is the prefix of any other code – Thus we always know if we are at the end of a given code File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 7
Variable length codes
Example: Letter: Prob: Code: a 0.4
1 b 0.1
010 c 0.1
011 d 0.1
e 0.1
f 0.1
g 0.1
0000 0001 0010 0011 Can be decoded with a binary tree!
Called Huffman code » Algorithm exists to easily create optimal code » » » Requires that a table of codes be mainted with file Most often used for fixed codes Example - Type 3 FAX File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 8
Data Compression
Irreversible Compression » » Compression which losses some information Example - compress a 400x400 image into a 100x100 image by averaging groups of 16 adjacent pixels » » Saves space, but resolution of picture reduced Used most often for visual or audio information (which has inherient redundancy) File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 9
Data Compression
Compression in UNIX »
pack
and
unpack
programs – Uses Huffman coding – 25% to 40% savings on text files – much less on binary files – Uses “.z” file prefix »
compress
and
uncompress
programs – Uses Lempel-Ziv compression – No coding table needed - self coding – Uses “.Z” file prefix File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 10
Reclaiming space in files
Suppose a variable length record in the middle of a file is modified so it is: » » Longer?
Shorter?
Suppose a record is » Added to to the middle?
» Deleted from middle?
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 11
Reclaiming space in files
Record deletion and storage compaction storage compaction » recovering unused space in a file » from deletion or from record size changing Consider deleted records » » Must be able to recognize deleted records Have a special mark for record – e,g, asterisk in first charater in key field – May be undeleted if not overwritten!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 12
Dealing with Deleted records
Occasional compaction Dynamic maintanance File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 13
Occasional compaction
A process periodically run which reads file, and rewrites with no empty space.
Could happen every night automactically every night/week/month File unavailable while operation underway.
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 14
Dynamic maintanance
Delete records by marking Reuse deleted records a new records added, updated Need: » » Way of knowing if deleted records exist Where deleted records are so we can jump right to them File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 15
Dynamic maintanance
Solution: linked list of deleted records » Each deleted record contains a mark, and a pointer to the next deleted record » The file header contains a pointer to the first deleted record.
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 16
Linked list of deleted records
Fixed-length records Variable-length records File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 17
Linked list of deleted records
Fixed-length records » Simply maintain a stack of deleted records rooted in header record » » » Deletion - add to front of list Addition - use record at front of list Minimal list maintanance cost File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 18
Linked list of deleted records
Variable-length records » Store for each deleted record – Deletion Marker – link to nect deleted record – record size indicator File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 19
Variable-length records
Insertion » Which deleted record?
Deletion » » Add records to list (stack?) Where File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 20
Variable-length records Insertion
Select and use a deleted record Break up records » pick a record » If size of deleted record bigger, break into two - a record to use and a new, smaller, deleted record.
» Put smaller deleted record back in list Leave empty space at end » » pick a record If size of deleted record bigger, just leave empty space at end.
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 21
Variable-length records Fragmentation
Recall fragmentation in Fixed-length records » » » At the end of fields if fixed length fields At the end of records in variable length fields Called
internal fragmentation
Leaving space and the end of a variable length records also leads to
internal fragmentation
.
Breaking up variable length records get rid of fragmentation, right? Wrong!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 22
Variable-length records Fragmentation
As records get broken up, smaller and smaller pieces get left over.
These pieces are
external fragmentation
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 23
Variable-length records Insertion strategy
How to pick record to use?
First Fit » Use first deleted record found in list Best Fit » Use deleted record closest in size Worst Fit » » Use deleted record that is largest No good when not breaking up records!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 24
Variable-length records Insertion
How do we find the record with the desired size?
» » Search them ALL!
Keep the records in sorted order by record size – Increasing size facilitates Best fit – Decreasing size facilitates worst fit (just pick first in list) – This increases deletion time!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 25
Variable-length records Reducing fragmentation
Merge adjacent free records How do we know if a newly deleted record is adjacent to a free record?
» » Search the deleted list Keep deleted records sorted by position in file – This makes finding of adjacent free space trivial – Costs more at deletion time File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 26
Fast Searching
Binary Searching » » O(log n), where n is number of records requires file be sorted Question - how do we sort file?
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 27
File Sorting
Sort in Ram » » » read in entire file - sort Called
internal sorting
Limited by size of memory File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 28
Binary Search - Problems
Binary searching requires more then one or two accesses » » » » Accesses are VERY expensive Access are very random (much seek time) 100,000 requires average of 16.5 accesses We would like to approach the speed of a direct lookup!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 29
Binary Search - Problems
Keeping a file sorted is expensive » Every record added must be entered in sorted order » Reordering is costly Internal sorted is limited to small files » We will see there are sort methods to sort a file that will not fit in memory. But it is still expensive!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 30
Keysorting
Rather then sorting file, we could sort an array of primary keys, where each key is accompanied by the address of the associated record.
Pointer could be a byte offset from start, or (if records fixed length) a RRN.
After sort keys, the file can be rewritten in order.
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 31
Keysorting
Advantages » Keys can be sorted in smaller space then whole file » Faster to sort (swap!) keys then entire records File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 32
Keysorting
Disadvantages » » Still limited in size to key lists which fit in memory Sequential processing cannot not take advantage of buffering!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 33
Keysorting
Alternative - keeping sorted keylist,pointer structure around.
Is a type of index file!
Can be read in and searched in memory!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 34
Key Sorted Index
Advantages » Keys and pointers can be searched in memery. Only one I/O per lookup!
» File can be maintained in ANY order. Searching and key order sequential processing still possible.
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 35
Key Sorted Index
Disadvantages » Sequential processing cannot not take advantage of buffering!
» Pinned records – Records in main file cannot change location without invalidating index file!
– Must either maintain index in parallel, or rebuild!
File Processing - Organizing file for Performance MVNC 36