Reducing Post-harvest Loss to Advance Food Security

Download Report

Transcript Reducing Post-harvest Loss to Advance Food Security

Reducing Post-harvest Loss to Advance Food Security

Steve Sonka, Director June 6, 2012

AGENDA

•

Future food security challenges

•

Several “views” of post-harvest loss

•

Post-harvest loss from an economic decision lens

•

The ADM Institute and its contributions

Global Food Demand Is Predicted to Increase 70% by 2050 (FAO; 2009) Per capita food consumption

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1964/66 World Industrialized countries 1964/66-1997/99 Growth Developing countries 1997/99-2030 Growth

Dietary changes in developing countries

2030 Food Demands Require About 200 Million More Hectares (McKinsey; 2011)

Tell Interesting Story (McKinsey; 2011)

AGENDA

•

Future food security challenges X

•

Several “views” of post-harvest loss

•

Post-harvest loss from an economic decision lens

•

The ADM Institute and its contributions

Kg per year

PHL Varies by Region

(FAO; 2011)

DATA!

Per capita food waste and food loss (Kg/year)

PHL Varies by Commodity

(FAO; 2011)

30% 20% 10% 0% 70% 60% 50% 40% 22%

Post-harvest loss estimates in South & Southeast Asia

49% 30% 66% Cereals Roots & Tubers Oilseeds & Pulses Fruit & Vegetables consumption distribution processing and packaging postharvest handling and storage agricultural production

PHL Varies Across Growing Conditions

(IBRD/WB; 2011) Generalized loss profiles for major grains in Eastern and Southern Africa

30,0% 25,0% 20,0% 15,0% 10,0% 5,0% 24,2% 16,8% 18,2% 14,6% 16,9% 0,0%

hot/humid maize small warm maize large arid/desert sorghum small arid/desert millet small hot/humid rice small

market storage transport to market storage transport to store winnowing shelling/threshing drying harvesting/field drying

PHL Varies Between Countries: For Same Crop (FAO; 2002) Rice: Total post-harvest losses

2% 1% 0% 6% 5% 4% 3% 1% 0,85% 1,31% 0,99%

harvesting threshing

3,16% 3,47%

drying

5,46% 3,74%

storage

4,78% 2,74% Asia China

milling

30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0%

PHL Varies Between States Within One Country (ADM Institute; 2012) Estimated post-harvest loss of black gram in India

25,28% 22,68% grading & repacking transport storage threshing drying harvesting Maharashtra Madhya Pradesh

A More Specific Perspective: Rice in SE Asia (IRRI; 2011) Crop

In SE Asia, physical losses range from 15-25%. Quality losses range from 10-30% (loss in value)

Consumption

Reducing PHL and Increasing Yields Have High Potential (McKinsey; 2011)

Little Attention Is Devoted to PHL and Yields (McKinsey; 2011)

Why Reduce Post-harvest Loss?

Some Hypotheses

•

Estimates suggest 1/3 of agricultural production is “wasted” and doesn’t reach food consumer

•

Investment required to reduce PHL could be modest

•

Technology advances should make reduction more feasible and less expensive

•

Arable land, water, energy are in limited supply – reducing PHL can lessen pressure on scarce resources

AGENDA

•

Future food security challenges X

•

Several “views” of post-harvest loss X

•

Post-harvest loss from an economic decision lens

•

The ADM Institute and its contributions

Investable Framework for Reduction of Post-harvest Loss Value $s

S

Cost of Reduction

S1 D1 D

Benefits of Reduction (Quantity & Quality) Current Setting 50 % Reduction 100 % Reduction

Reduced Loss (%)

AGENDA

•

Future food security challenges X

•

Several “views” of post-harvest loss X

•

Post-harvest loss from an economic decision lens

•

The ADM Institute and its contributions X

Timeline of the ADM Institute

Fall, 2010 Jan 19, 2011 Feb, 2011 Initial conversations Official announcement & celebration $10 Million gift India/Brazil emphasis Staple crops Seed research efforts initiated $0.4 million in funding allocated Visioning processes Mar /Jul, 2011 Fall, 2011 RFP issued $2.1 million in funding allocated Throughout 2011 – Prospecting for collaborating entities

The ADM Institute for the Prevention of Postharvest Loss Vision Statement Key elements include:

•

To be an international information and technology hub

•

To encompass technologies, practices and systems

•

To focus on staple crops in key agricultural domains

Research Themes

Measurement & technology development Systems informatics & analysis Policy analysis Education, training, & information transfer

Our Aspirational Contributions

Measurement of loss Challenge Investable implementation framework Quantum jump technology

[email protected]

http://postharvestinstitute.illinois.edu/