15-Competition

Download Report

Transcript 15-Competition

Exploitation vs. interference competition Lotka-Volterra Competition equations Assumptions: linear response to crowding both within and between species, no lag in response to change in density,

r

,

K

, a Competition coefficients a

ij

,

i

having the effect is species affected and

j

constant is the species Solving for zero isoclines, resultant vector analyses Point attractors, saddle points, stable and unstable equilibria Four cases, depending on

K

/ a ’ s compared to

K

’ s Sp. 1 wins, sp. 2 wins, either/or, or coexistence Gause ’ s and Park ’ s competition experiments Mutualism equations, conditions for stability: Intraspecific self damping must be stronger than interspecific positive mutualistic effects.

Diffuse competition:

N i * = K i

Alpha matrices,

N

and

K

vectors

Matrix Algebra Notation: S a

ij

N = K – AN

N j

Partial derivatives, ∂

N i

/∂

N j

sensitivity of species

i

to changes in Jacobian matrix (community matrices), Lyapunov stability

j

Evidence for competition in nature Resource partitioning among sympatric congeneric pairs Resource Matrices, food, place, time niche dimensions Complementarity of niche dimensions Galapagos finches, beak depth, seed size Character displacement

Hydrobia

mud snails Hutchinsonian ratios Corixids, musical instruments, knives, pots, trikes, bikes Accipter hawks, monitor lizards

Evidence of Competition in Nature often circumstantial

1. Resource partitioning among closely-related sympatric congeneric species (food, place, and time niches) Complementarity of niche dimensions 2. Character displacement 3. Incomplete biotas: niche shifts 4. Taxonomic composition of communities

Complementarity of Niche Dimensions, page 276 Thomas Schoener

Prey size versus predator size

Prey size versus predator size

Ctenotus

skinks Hawks

Character Displacement, Galápagos finches Peter R. Grant David Lack

Character Displacement in

Hydrobia

mud snails in Denmark

Snail shell length, mm

Corixid Water Boatman G. E. Hutchinson

Hutchinsonian Ratios

Henry S. Horn

Hutchinsonian Ratios

Bob May

Henry S. Horn

Hutchinsonian Ratios Limiting Similarity

Bob May

Henry S. Horn

Hutchinsonian Ratios Limiting Similarity

Bob May Recorders

Wind Instruments

Kitchen Knives

Kitchen Pots

Tricycles

Bikes

Hutchinsonian ratios among short wing Accipiter hawks

Thomas W. Schoener

Nicole hugs A komodo monitor

Hutchinsonian ratios among Australian

Varanus

lizards 25 Expected Observed (R) Observed (L) 20 15 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Hutchinsonian Ratio 6 7 8 9

The ecological niche, function of a species in the community Resource utilization functions (RUFs) Competitive communities in equilibrium with their resources Hutchinson ’ s

n

-dimensional hypervolume concept Fundamental and Realized Niches Resource matrices Niche Breadth (vector) Niche Overlap (matrix)

Ecological Niche = sum total of adaptations of an organismic unit How does the organism conform to its particular environment?

Resource Utilization Functions = RUFs

Within-phenotype versus between-phenotype components of niche width

Within Phenotype Between Phenotype Individuals are generalists More specialized individuals

n

-Dimensional Hypervolume Model

Fitness density Hutchinson ’ s Fundamental and Realized Niches G. E. Hutchinson

Euclid

Euclidean distance

d jk

= sqrt [

S

(

p ij

-

p ik

) 2 ] where

j

and

k

represent species

j

and species

k,

the

p ij

and

p ik

s represent the proportional utilization or electivities of resource state

i

used by species

j

and species

k

, respectively and the summation is from

i

to

n.

n

is the number of resource dimensions

Robert H. MacArthur

Geographical Ecology

Range of Available Resources Average Niche Breadth Niche Overlap

MacArthur, R. H. 1970. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theoret. Population Biol. 1: 1-11. Species Packing, one dimension Resource Utilization Functions = RUFs

Species Packing , one dimension, two neighbors in niche space Three generalized abundant species with broad niche breadths Nine specialized less abundant species with with narrow niche breadths

Niche Breadth Jack of all trades is a master of none Robert H. MacArthur MacArthur & Levin ’ s Theory of Limiting Similarity Richard Levins Specialists are favored when resources are very different

Robert H. MacArthur Niche Breadth Jack of all trades is a master of none MacArthur & Levin ’ s Theory of Limiting Similarity Richard Levins Generalists are favored when resources are more similar

Niche Dimensionality

1 D = ~ 2 Neighbors 2 D = ~ 6 Neighbors 3 D = ~ 12 Neighbors 4 D = ~ 20 Neighbors NN = D + D 2

Diffuse Competition

dN i /dt = r i N i

(

K i dN i /dt =

0 when -

N i -

Sa

ij N j

)

N i = K i -

Sa

ij N j

Niche Overlap Hypothesis