European Export Control Update Presentation

download report

Transcript European Export Control Update Presentation

European Export Control Update
Naboth van den Broek
Boston, 31 May 2012
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
1. EU Export Control Regime - Overview
2. Dual-Use Goods & Technology
3. Military Goods & Technology
4. Sanctions
5. Recent Developments / Update
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
2
1. EU Export Control: Overview
 National rules (27 Member
States)
 Defense & Security= MbS
prerogative
 Procedural rules and enforcement
 European rules
 Trade = EU prerogative
 International rules
 EU-level “Community” rules
 EU-level “intergovernmental”
rules (binding and nonbinding)
 Member States rules
expanding scope of EU rules
 Autonomous Member State
rules
 Member State procedural
rules
 International rules
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
3
2. EU Dual-Use Rules: General
 Community (EU) ‘Competence’  Largely regulated at
EU level
 Regulation 428/2009
 Dual-use items are:
“… items, including software and technology, which can be used for
both civil and military purposes, and shall include all goods which can
be used for both non-explosive uses and assisting in any way in the
manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.”
(Reg. 428/2009)
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
4
EU Dual-Use Rules: Coverage
 General




Single, regularly updated common list of items requiring export authorization
“Catch all” for certain end-uses
Items exported to final destination outside EU
Some items (“sensitive” or “very sensitive”) are covered even for intra-EU
transfer (see Annex IV parts I and II)
 Noteworthy
 Includes tangible technology (objects, documents, software) and intangible
technology (skills, know-how)
 Includes physical transfer and electronic media, fax or phone
 Includes “technical assistance”
 Includes non-necessary information for patent applications
 Includes technology integrated into other products
 Non listed dual-use items: authorization may be required
 Specific national rules may apply/interpretations may differ
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
5
EU Dual-Use Rules: Procedures
 License must be obtained in Member State where the exporter is
established
 “Exporter” = person on whose behalf the export declaration is made /
who holds the power to determine the sending of the items
 Licensing procedures established by each Member State, including
record-keeping
 If multiple Member States involved there is a “consultation” process
(veto!)
 Enforcement and Implementation at Member State level
 Several types of licenses (“authorizations”)
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
6
3. EU Military Export Controls
 Member State “Competence” - however EU rules exist:
– Export outside the EU: Common position 2008/944/CFSP
– Export within the EU: Directive 2009/43
 In both cases:
– Items  listed in EU Common Military List (not exhaustive +
regularly updated) (similar to U.S. ITAR but with some
differences)
– License  Member State
 Bilateral issues
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
7
4. EU Sanctions
 EU and Member State legislation
– Enforcement & admin: Member State level
 Generally in accordance with international policies (UN, OSCE)
 EU sanctions “programs”: Iran, Libya, Syria
 EU arms embargos/asset freezes/prohibition of specific services:
Afghanistan, Belarus, China, Eritrea, Iraq, North Korea, Zimbabwe,
terrorists group etc.
 Focus on specific items, particularly arms, munitions; but sometimes
broader (technology, financing, specific end-users, flight bans,
investment)
 Generally no US-style general embargoes
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
8
Key Regulatory and Other
Developments
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
9
1. Dual-Use: Changes to the EU Dual-Use
Rules

Annex I to Reg. 428/2009 amended on April 2012  comes into
force on 15 June 2012
Regulation 1232/2011 (December 2012):


Introduction of five new EU General Authorizations (EU GEAs) (total: 6)










EU001 – exports to Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland
(including Liechtenstein) and United States of America
EU002 – export of certain dual-use items to certain destinations
EU003 – export after repair/replacement
EU004 – temporary export for exhibition or fair
EU005 – telecommunications
EU006 – chemicals
New measures to increase transparency and improve enforcement including
possibility to prohibit certain exporters from using EU GEAs.
No EU GEA for Computers & Related Equipment; concern about human
rights/monitoring
Reminder: Brokering services covered
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
10
2. Dual-use: EU Green Paper on Dual-Use
Goods
 Proposed Reform: Amendment expected toward end2012
 Key items expected:
 Common risk assessment approach of all export control authorities
 Improved exchange of info about suspicious transactions and licensing
decisions
 Phase out NGAs in favour of EU GEAs
 Common approach to catch-all controls
 Working toward a fully integrated internal market for dual-use items
(phase out internal controls)
 Coordinated enforcement across the EU + improved access to relevant
info for customs enforcement
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
11
3. Sanctions: Significantly more active sanctions
landscape

Sanctions are getting broader (Iran, Syria, Libya,
terrorism blacklists)

Basic approach continues to follow the UN, but more
active stance and closer coordination with U.S.
sanctions policy

Member States continue to play an active role

Judicial Protection continues to be a challenge

Burma: suspended
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
12
4. More active enforcement
 Expect to see continued increase in focus on
export controls and enforcement
 Expect to see continued focus on sanctions
 Expect to see more coordinated action (?)
 Between MbS
 Between policy areas
 Focus on broader range of technologies
(computers & related equipment, telecom
equipment, software)
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
13
5. More opportunities for risk mitigation and
cooperation
 Active compliance audits but also an increased focus
on compliance programs to mitigate risk and reduce
penalties
 No formal Voluntary Disclosure process, but don’t
forget regulatory cooperation…
 Judicial Protection (sanctions, Lisbon Treaty)
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
14
6. Don’t forget other EU Regulations!
 EU regulatory policy is increasingly wide-spread and has
an ever wider product and geographic scope
 Beyond export control and sanctions, there are other
areas of regulation for US exporters to take into account,
including:
 Environmental regulations (electrical goods, electronic waste, nanotech,
biotech, etc.)
 Technical standards and regulations
 Competition rules (affecting licensing, reselling, distribution)
 Data protection & Privacy
 Sanctions for non-compliance can be severe
 US – EU Trade Cooperation (Working Group / FTA ?)
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
15
Thank you for your attention!
Naboth van den Broek
[email protected]
Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
WilmerHale
16