Consumer Behavior, Utility Maximization, Indifference Curves
Download
Report
Transcript Consumer Behavior, Utility Maximization, Indifference Curves
Consumer Behavior, Utility
Maximization, Indifference Curves
Income Effect
Impact Δ price of product has on
real income/purchasing power
(real vs. nominal) and therefore on
quantity demanded
Inflation/deflation
Objective measure: true regardless
of changes in other goods
Substitution Effect
Impact Δ price product on relative
expensiveness and therefore QD
Subjective measure: inoperative if
everything else gets more
expensive too
Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
Utility: want-satisfying power
1) not usefulness; 2) subjective; 3)
but quantifiable: utils
Total utility vs. marginal utility
Helps explain demand curve (have
to cut prices to sell more as MU
diminishes) and elasticity (how
quickly MU diminishes: fast=
inelastic, slower = elastic)
Theory of Consumer Behavior
1) Rational: maximize total utility
2) Preferences: good idea of
marginal utility
3) Budget restraint: finite resources
+ therefore income
4) Prices: product prices not
affected by amount individual buys
(unlike Bootie Beer stocks)
Utility-Maximizing Rule
“The consumer should allocate
his/her money income so that the
last dollar spent on each product
yields the same amount of marginal
utility” “balance the margins”
equilibrium, ceteris paribus
Units
A: price =$1;B: price =$2; Income $10
A: MU
A: MU/$ B: MU
B: MU/$
1
10
10
24
12
2
8
8
20
10
3
7
7
18
9
4
6
6
16
8
5
5
5
12
6
Algebra
MU A/$A = MUB/$B
Indifference Curves
Budget line: a schedule or curve that
shows various combinations of two
products a consumer can purchase with
a specific money income
Income Δ Δ curve (up right; down
left)
Price Δ: if both Δ shift; if one slope Δ
Unattainable
Attainable
(inefficient)
Attainable
(efficient)
Indifference Curve
IC: Shows all combinations of two products A
and B which will yield the same total
satisfaction/utility to a consumer
Gets same utility from any combination, so indifferent
to which combination
Downsloping: more of one means less of the
other
Convex to origin: diminishing slope as move
down marginal rate of substitution:
willingness to substitute B for A diminishes as
move down curve: as amount of B increase, MU
of B decreases while as quantity A decreases
MU of A increases (and vice versa)
Indifference Map
Perfect Substitutes
Perfect Complements (l+r shoes)
Equilibrium position: intersection
budget line and highest indifference
curve
Difference Marginal Utility Theory and
Indifference Curve Theory
MUT requires consumer knows MU
ICT requires only that knows that
different combination generates
more or less satisfaction but not
how much more/less
Nevertheless, at equilibrium Pb/Pa=
MUb/MUa so both give same result
Deriving a Demand Curve from the
Indifference Curve