Transcript Linear order
Cosmological post-Newtonian Approximation compared with Perturbation Theory
J. Hwang KNU/KIAS 2012.02.17
Question
Action at a distance
Compared with Einstein’s gravity, is Newton's gravity reliable in near horizon scale simulation?
Linear deviation from homogeneous-isotropic background
Newton’s theory:
Non-relativistic (no c) Action at a distance, violate causality c=∞ limit of Einstein’s gravity: 0 th post-Newtonian limit No horizon Static nature No strong pressure No strong gravity No gravitational waves Incomplete and inconsistent
Einstein’s gravity:
Relativistic Strong gravity, dynamic Simplest
Perturbation method:
Perturbation expansion All perturbation variables are small Weakly nonlinear Strong gravity; fully relativistic Valid in all scales
Post-Newtonian method:
Abandon geometric spirit of GR: recover the good old absolute space and absolute time Provide GR correction terms in the Newtonian equations of motion Expansion in strength of gravity Fully nonlinear No strong gravity situation; weakly relativistic Valid far inside horizon
Fully Relativistic Weakly Relativistic Newtonian Gravity axis Background World Model axis Weakly Nonlinear Linear Perturbation ?
Fully Nonlinear
PT vs. PN
Fully Relativistic
“Terra Incognita”
Numerical Relativity Weakly Relativistic Newtonian Gravity axis Background World Model axis Weakly Nonlinear Post-Newtonian (PN) Approximation Fully Nonlinear
Linear Perturbation vs. 1PN
Fully Relativistic Cosmological Nonlinear Perturbation (2 nd and 3 rd order)
“Terra Incognita”
Numerical Relativity Weakly Relativistic Newtonian Gravity axis Background World Model axis Weakly Nonlinear Linear Perturbation Cosmological 1 st order Post-Newtonian (1PN) Fully Nonlinear
Newtonian Theory
Newtonian perturbation equations:
Newtonian (0PN) metric: Mass conservation: Momentum conservation: Poisson’s equation:
By combining: To linear order:
Perturbation Theory
Metric convention:
(Bardeen 1988)
Spatial gauge:
Bardeen, J.M. in “Particle Physics and Cosmology” edited by Fang, L., & Zee, A. (Gordon and Breach, London, 1988) p1
To linear order:
Perturbed Lapse, Acceleration Curvature perturbation Perturbed expansion Shear
Gauge-invariant combinations:
: A gauge-invariant density perturbation based on the comoving gauge
Relativistic/Newtonian correspondences:
Uniform-expansion-gauge Uniform-curvature gauge Comoving gauge Zero-shear gauge Perturbed density, Perturbed velocity Perturbed gravitational potential Perturbed curvature JH, Noh, Gong (2012)
Relativistic/Newtonian correspondence
includes Λ , but assumes: 1. Flat Friedmann background 2. Zero-pressure 3. Irrotational 4. Single component fluid 5. No gravitational waves 6. Second order in perturbations Relaxing any of these assumptions could lead to pure general relativistic effects!
Linear order:
Lifshitz (1946)/Bonnor(1957)
(comoving-synchronous gauge) Second order:
Peebles (1980)/Noh-JH (2004)
(K=0, comoving gauge) Third order:
JH-Noh (2005)
Curvature perturbation in the comoving gauge ~10 -5 Pure General Relativistic corrections
Physical Review D 69 10411 (2004); 72 044012 (2005)
The unreasonable effectiveness of Newtonian gravity in cosmology!
Pure Einstein Vishniac MN 1983 Jeong et al 2011
Jeong, Gong, Noh, JH, ApJ 722, 1(2011)
Post-Newtonian Approximation
Newtonian gravitational potential Minkowski background Robertson-Walker background JH, Noh, Puetzfeld, JCAP 03 010 (2008)
Zero-pressure 1PN equations:
E-conservation: Mom-conservation: Nonlinear Raychaudhury-eq: G 0 0 -G i i Mom-constraint: G 0 i
1PN compared with Newtonian: 0PN: 1PN: 1PN
v=u
PN vs. PT
Comparison (flat background): 1PN: Linear PT:
Comparison: PT PN PN: gauge-invariant PT: depends on the gauge condition
Comoving gauge:
Zero-shear gauge:
Uniform-expansion gauge:
Noh, JH, Bertschinger (2012)
For growing solution:
(Takada & Futamase, MN 1999)
Spurious mode Physical density fluctuations
Newtonian interpretation: Newtonian: Einstein: Correspondence with mixed gauges: To second-order
Question
Compared with Einstein’s gravity, is Newton's gravity reliable in near horizon scale simulation?