Government of Canada Federating Identity

Download Report

Transcript Government of Canada Federating Identity

Federating Identity Management in the
Government of Canada
Identity North Conference
November 20th 2012
Presented by: Rita Whittle
Senior Director, Cyber Authentication and
Identity Management Program
Government of Canada Context
 Speech from the Throne and Budget 2012
 Citizen-focused service delivery - Improve services and service delivery to
Canadians at a lower cost
 Standardize, consolidate and re-engineer the way the GC does business
 Whole-of-government approach: Modernize the way we work and serve
Canadians in an increasingly horizontal and collaborative world
 Expectations of Clients
 Seamless, secure, e-enabled delivery channels
 Better, faster and more convenient access to government services
 Ability to interact seamlessly with multiple governments, through multiple
channels
2
. . . Government of Canada Context
 Payments Review Task Force Report
 “A robust digital ID regime is one where identification is accomplished without
paper documents or face-to-face visits, and in a way that protects sensitive
information and the privacy of the individual.”
 Called for the creation of a Canadian Digital ID and Authentication Council
(DIAC) which is now in place
 Becoming a Digital Nation (reference: Stratford Institute,
04/2012)
 Increase Canada’s performance through digital technologies
 Facilitate the transition to digital services, digital payments and digital identity
 Trusting identities across jurisdictions must be solved using a pan-Canadian
approach
3
Identity is the Starting Point for
Services, Benefits and Entitlements
High value services
Today, identity is managed separately by each department, jurisdiction and sector…
Financial Sector
Public Sector
Who are you?
Who are you?
Who are you?
How will you pay?
Are you eligible for a
government benefit?
What is your
medical history?
Identity risks
!
Healthcare Sector
Identity risks
translate into:
translate into:
! Sector Issues
Sector Issues
•Financial fraud
•Money laundering
•Higher transaction fees
Identity risks
!
•Benefits fraud
•Longer processing times
•Redundant processes
translate into:
Sector Issues
•Prescription fraud
•Patient Privacy
•Record integrity
… but the impacts are felt by everyone
4
Vision: Pan-Canadian Approach
Collaborative effort between jurisdictions and sectors
Principles:
 Respect privacy
 Client choice
 Governments have a key
role to play
 Collaborate with trusted
private sector institutions
 Phased approach to
evolving services and
infrastructure
Federated Approach
Trusting credentials and identities:
•Across jurisdictions
•Across sectors
•Internationally
Federating Credentials
Federating Identity
‘trusting credentials
issued by other jurisdictions
and industry sectors’
‘trusting identities
that have been established
by other jurisdictions’
5
Identity Context
 Identity information is required for valued transactions
 It is the starting point of management of interactions and transactions (initial and ongoing) in all sectors, necessary for service provisioning, determining access, granting of
benefits and entitlements, etc.
 Risk related to identity information impacts the immediate interaction/transaction and can
impact other downstream activities
 Identity information exists and is managed across orders of government
 Digital Identity is becoming increasingly important




Financial and social interactions are becoming digital
Necessary for transition to online channel, advancing the digital economy of Canada
Key to Integrating processes across organizations and jurisdictions
Must align with international trends
 Identity theft and fraud
 Speed of fraud in cyberspace vs. in the physical world
 Criminal element has moved online
6
Evolution to Federating Identity
Federating Credentials
Federating Identity
GC Approach
Pan-Canadian Approach
Cyber Authentication
Service
GC Identity Federation
Service
Identity Federation
Service
Mandatory Services
Pilot Projects
Federation Enablers
Commercial
GC Issued
GC Identity
Assurance Service
GC Identity
Validation Service
Other jurisdictions
Identity
Services
Identity
Federation
Services
Credential
Federation
Services
Policy Enablers
Legislative Enablers
Standards-based
Standards-based
Standards-based
Federation
Federation
Federation
 Multiple Recognized Providers
 Multiple Credential Options
 Multiple Levels of Assurance
 GC Identity Validation Service
 Identity Business & Technical
Architecture
 DIAC Governance
 Commercial Services
 Multiple Authoritative
Identity Sources
7
Strategic Relationships
 Inter-jurisdictional: Joint Councils – Public Sector Service Delivery Council
and Public Sector CIO Council
 Identity Management Sub-Committee (IMSC)
 Composition: Federal, Provincial, Territorial, Municipal
 International Dialogues
 Other governments - United States, Australia, New Zealand, U.K.
 Kantara Initiative
 ICA (International Council for Information Technology in Government Administration)
 Digital ID and Authentication Council (DIAC)
 Public and private sector forum recommended by the Task Force for Payments System
Review
 Mandated to develop pan-Canadian approach to digital ID and authentication and
facilitate development of interoperable policies, standards and systems
 Composition: Independent Chair (private industry); Government Representatives; Industry
Representatives (telecommunications, banks, health); Independent Representatives
8
Cyber Authentication Renewal Strategy
 Transformative “federation of credentials” approach
 First major step enabling transformative online service delivery
 Lays foundation for evolving relationships with other jurisdictions and the
private sector
 Credentials issued by service providers other than the GC can be trusted to
access online government services = Choice of Credentials
 Provides cost-effective, standards based solution
 Respects Clients’ Privacy
 Fundamental design of GC Cyber Authentication Renewal driven by privacy
policy considerations
 Distinction maintained between assurance of credential and assurance of
identity – the “anonymous credential” ensures privacy is respected
 Authentication service provides assurance that the same individual is
accessing an online service, but does not reveal the identity of the individual
(the “persistent anonymous identifier”)
 Identity only associated to credential during program enrolment within
individual department domain
9
Choice of Credentials
 Credential Broker Service - An innovative relationship with private
sector
 SecureKey Concierge operational since April 2012 - Enables log in to GC online
services using commercially available credentials (currently three Canadian
financial institutions: Scotiabank, TD, BMO)
 Leverages the investments made in security and infrastructure in the private
sector
 To respect privacy, minimal and non-personally identifiable information is
managed and used through Credential Broker Service
 Positions the GC to benefit from ongoing industry investments in evolving and
strengthening assurance levels
 GC Key Service – Provides option to use a GC credential
 Ensures all GC clients have ability to log in to e-services
 Implementation is currently underway by GC departments
10
Identity Management: Strategy-in-Brief
 GC’s strategy on identity management is based on a federated
approach using the following principles:
 Give choices to citizens and businesses to decide on how they want to identify
themselves to receive services
 Enable a “tell us once” strategy by allowing the re-use of personal identity
information across multiple service delivery channels
 Ensure the integrity of the information through validation from trusted
(authoritative) sources of identity information
 Establish interoperability standards
 Partner with other jurisdictions and the private sector to deliver solutions
 Promote a fair and equitable competitive market place
 Policy instruments to support federating identity in the GC are
currently under development (standard and guidelines)
11
Moving Forward
 TBS is leading discussions on federating identity within the GC,
building on solid cyber authentication base
 Open to future enhancements
 Flexible in meeting GC program needs
 Providing client choice
 Privacy central to any plans for federating identity going forward
 Policy positions will be evolved through continuing engagement
and consultation with GC departments
 Discussions underway with GC departments to explore suitable candidates for
e-validation pilot projects – one for individuals, one for businesses
 Will inform the broader GC federating identity strategy moving forward
– demonstrating business value and technical feasibility
– identifying potential policy and legislative considerations
 Continuing analysis underway
12
Questions and Discussion
13