Grazing Management to Meet Animal Performance Targets

Download Report

Transcript Grazing Management to Meet Animal Performance Targets

Grazing Management
to Meet Animal
Performance Targets
Mark Kennedy
State Grazinglands Specialist
USDA-NRCS
Houston, MO
Meeting the Nutritional Needs
of Livestock from Pasture
INTAKE
INTAKE
INTAKE
Overview
 Balancing animal numbers and forage
supply
 Matching diet quantity and quality needs
 Matching grazing management and
paddock numbers
Animal Intake / Stocking
Rate
 There is only a certain amount of forage
produced in any plant community that is
available for use. Every acre can only
support a finite amount of animal weight
 Matching the type and number of
livestock to the forage base is very
important for meeting animal targets as
well as maintaining pasture condition
The 1st Step: Balance Livestock
Numbers with Forage Supply
•
Stocking rate: The number of animals or animal
liveweight assigned to a grazing unit on a seasonal basis.
•
Carrying capacity: The stocking rate that provides a
target level of performance while maintaining the integrity
of the resource base.
•
Stocking rate has a big effect on intake and availability.
Carrying capacity of pasture is
determined by four factors
Carrying
Capacity
Forage
Production
X
Seasonal
Utilization Rate
X
Length of the
Grazing Season
=
Daily
Intake
Carrying Capacity
 Example:




Stocker operation(buying 500# selling 800#)
200 day seasonal grazing (April 1 - Oct. 20)
16 paddock system (1-3 day grazing period)
8000 lb. total forage production (from
history/experience, soil survey, forage
suitability groups)
Grazier’s Arithmetic
Then ….
Carrying
8000 lb/acre X .65
=
Capacity .03 lb forage/lb liveweight X 200 days
= 867 lb liveweight / acre
Grazier’s Arithmetic
 867 lbs. per acre/500 lb = 1.73 steers/ac
 Can we stock 1.73 steers/ac initially?
 If we expect them to grow to 800 lb. then
 800 + 500 = 1300/2 = 650 (avg wt)
 867/650 = 1.33 steers/ac
Forage Intake on
Pasture
 Quantity/Availability
 Proper stocking rates, grazing management
 Quality
 Grazing management, species selection
Effect of Forage Availability
on Relative Forage Intake
Effect of Forage Availability
on Relative Forage Intake
How much does a 1,000 lb
Cow eat?
@2.5% BW about 25lb DM
With limited availability
19 lb DM
Intake
 75% Availability
 Time spent grazing
 6–10 hours per day
 6–10 hours ruminating
 Biting rate
 Cattle avg. 50
bites/min
 Bite size
 Cattle average 0.3 g
DM per bite
 Measured range of
0.07 to 0.59 g per bite
 Related to availability
 25% forage quality
Factors Affecting Intake
Dry matter intake =
Biting Rate x Biting (grazing) Time x Bite Size
Dry matter intake =
50 bites/min x 600 min/day x 0.3 g/bite =
9.0 kg or 19.8 lb DM intake per day
Factors Affecting Intake
If bite size is only 0.07 g/bite
50 bites/min x 600 min/day x 0.07 g/bite =
2.1 kg or 4.6 lb DM intake per day
If bite size is 0.59 g/bite
50 bites/min x 600 min/day x 0.59 g/bite =
17.7 kg or 38.9 lb DM intake per day
Effect of Forage Availability
on Relative Forage Intake
6 - 10”
2 - 3”
The Quantity – Quality
Compromise
Factors affecting forage quality

Plant maturity

Species
Plant
Part
Factors affecting forage quality

Plant maturity
 Growth
stage
 Length of rest period
Plant Growth Phases
Rest Period Needs
Clover
Annual Lespedeza
Orchardgrass
Stockpile
Birdsfoot Trefoil
30 - 35 days
20 - 25 days
Yield (tons/A)
1.0
Fescue
15 - 20 days
1.5
0.5
0.0
Spring
Summer
Fall
Factors affecting forage quality

Plant maturity

Species
Factors affecting forage quality

Species
 Legumes
> grasses
 Annuals > perennials
 Cool-season > warm season
Forage Chain
Winter
J F
Spring
M A M
Summer
J J A
Fall
S O N
Winter
D
LEGUME, Cool seanon grass – based
perennial pastures
Winter Annuals-rye,
ryegrass, triticale,
brassicas
High Quality
Hay/stockpiled
fescue
Summer
Annualsforage
sorghums,
sudangrass,
millet, corn,
crabgrass,
perennial warm
season
grasses
Winter Annuals – rye,
ryegrass,
triticale,brassicas
High Quality
Hay/stockpiled
fescue
Diversity is the Key
 Diverse pastures are
more productive
 Are less prone to
disease and insect
damage
 Broadens nutritional
opportunities of the
grazing livestock
 Legumes provide
nitrogen for the grass
and improve overall diet
quality
Factors affecting forage quality

Plant part

Leaves vs stems
 First bite vs second bite
3 Factors Affecting Forage Quality
1. Maturity
2. Species
3. Plant Part
1st bite: leaves with low fiber
High quality
2nd bite: medium quality
3rd bite: stems with high fiber – low
quality – leave for regrowth
Animal Requirements vs
Forage Quality at Different Maturities
• Can use different stages of quality to our
advantage
• Adjust body condition score
• Increase, maintain, or decrease body condition
• Creep grazing
• Calves allowed to creep gaze into higher quality pasture
• “Leader – Follower” grazing
• Animals with highest nutrient needs graze pasture first
followed by those with lower nutritional needs
High Quality -First grazers
Medium quality - Last grazers
Expected Intake of
Different Quality Forages
Intake as a
Forage
Relative Feed % of Body
Quality
Value
Weight
---------------- ---------------- ---------------Poor
<80
1%
Average
85-115
2%
Good
120-140
2.5%
Excellent
>150
>3%
Estimated Nutrient Content of
Tall Fescue at Different Maturities
NDF % ADF %
CP %
NEm
NEg
Mcal/lb Mcal/lb
Vegetative
49
27
20
0.70
0.39
Late boot
57
36
16
0.58
0.29
Mature
70
42
8
0.53
0.23
Animal Requirements vs
Forage Quality at Different Maturities
600 lb beef steer, 2.0 lb ADG
Intake Intake
% bw lb DM
Requirement
CP
lb
NEm
Mcal
ADG
lb/day
2.5
15.0
1.6
5.2
Vegetative
2.5
15.0
3.0
10.5
2.0+
Late boot
2.1
12.6
2.0
7.2
1.2
Mature
1.7
10.2
0.8
5.4
<0.5
Performance
Monitor your forage for
quality
Tried and true method
How high is the pile?
Forage Quality:
Pancake batter, Pumpkin
Pies or Wedding Cakes?
The Key to Successful
Grazing Management
 Flexibility
 The ability to
adapt or modify,
being
responsive to
changing
conditions
Grazing Management
Objectives
 Have grazing animals take 1 large bite or
mouthful (animal intake) off of as many plants
as possible in a pasture (Utilization)
 Remove the animals from the pasture before
any regrowth occurs and by the time 50% of
the current growth has been removed (plant
persistence/health)(animal intake)
 Have enough pastures to allow sufficient
regrowth and rest before being grazed again
(rest/plant health) (animal intake)
Mark Kennedy, Ozarkian, 2007
Plant Growth and Management:
During grazing periods: control stubble height
•not too low—keep growing points
•not too low—good photosynthesis for regrowth
•not too low—keep roots growing
•not too low – maintain bite size for intake
Between grazing periods: schedule rest periods
•allow photosynthesis
•allow leaves to regrow to proper heights
•not too long or forage quality declines
Plant Growth and Management:
•
Example: 12 paddock system
• Grazing period
2 day 3 day
• Rest Period
22 day 33 day
Flexibility!
4 day
44 day
Matching Forage and
Animal Resources
 Enterprises with higher potential net
return require higher quality pasture
and more intensive management




Greater forage yield per acre
Forage quality should be better
Management must be more intensive
Number of paddocks should be greater
Matching forage and livestock resources
 Economic potential of grazing enterprises

Pasture-based dairy/Beef finishing

Dairy replacements /Beef stockers

Sheep and goats, Cow-calf, Horses
Paddock #’s
So how many paddocks do I
need?
 It depends
 length of grazing period desired
 producer goals, livestock performance
 length of rest period needed
 Changes seasonally

rest period
grazing period
+ # herds = paddock #
Grazing period Needs
 Plant based:
 2 - 5 days fast
grow
 5 - 9 days
moderate
 9 - 12 slow
growth
 Animal
performance:
 .5 - 1 day dairy
cows/finishing
 1 - 2 days
growing/fattening
 2 - 5 days lactating
beef cattle, sheep,
horses
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Impact of Days on Paddock
on Organic Matter Intake
30
Stem
Leaf
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10 11 12 13
Days on Pasture
OM Intake (lb/hd/day)
DM Available (lb/acre)
Impact of Days on Paddock on
Change in Sward Composition
25
20
15
10
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10 11 12 13
Days on Pasture
Rest period needs
 Rest period needs:
15 - 20 days during rapid growth
20 - 30 days during moderate growth
30 - 45 days during slow growth
40 - 60 days very slow growth
How many paddocks do I
need?
 Paddock Number = rest period
grazing period + 1
 Ex:
20 day rest period - spring
2 day grazing period
+1 = 11
40 day rest period - summer
2 day grazing period
+ 1 = 21
How many paddocks do I
need?
 Or:
40 day rest period
4 day grazing period + 1 = 11
Optimum Paddock #’s
based on Livestock Type
(Rule of Thumb)
Livestock type
Grazing Period
(Days)
Paddock #
Dairy/grass
finishing
0.5 – 1
20 - 80
Dairy heifer / beef 1 - 2
stockers
16 - 40
Cow/calf, Sheep,
Goats, Horses
8 - 16
2-5
Summary
 Animals delight most to feed on fresh plants
 Animals supplied with this kind of food would be
quickly fatted
 If a farmer divided his land into 15 - 20 equal
divisions,
 Stopped his beasts from roaming indiscriminately
 Put the whole number of his beasts into one of
these divisions
 Have the number of beasts so great as to
consume the best part of the grass in one day
Summary cont’d:
 Give them a fresh park every morning to repeat
the same repast
 Have so many parks as days required to
advance the grass to the proper length after
being eaten fare down
 So the first park would be ready to receive
them after going over all the others
 So they might be carried round in a constant
rotation
 James Anderson, Scottish Agriculturalist, 1777
The End
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all
or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 7202600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.