Transcript graham

Knowledge Translation:
Research Into Practice
Ian D Graham, PhD FCAHS
University of Ottawa
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
August 9, 2012
Learning Objectives
• To review conceptualizations of knowledge
translation
• To consider a translational framework
• To better understand the knowledge to action
process
The Problem
What do we really mean by translation of
research into practice?
Knowledge Transfer (KT)
T1, T2, T3…..
Knowledge to action (KTA)
Knowledge Translation (KT)
Knowledge Exchange (KE)
Commercialization
Implementation
Translational Research
Research Translation
Different conceptualizations of
translation
Translational Research
Westfall, J. M. et al. JAMA 2007;297:403-406
Khoury et al (2010)
Knowledge Translation
KT is a dynamic and iterative process that includes
synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically
sound application of knowledge to improve health,
provide more effective health services and products
and strengthen the health care system.
This process takes place within a complex system of
interactions between researchers and knowledge users which
may vary in intensity, complexity and level of engagement
depending on the nature of the research and the findings as
well as the needs of the particular knowledge user.
(adapted from http://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html)
Essentially Two kinds of KT
 The researcher develops and implements a
End of grant KT
Integrated KT
plan for making knowledge users aware of the
knowledge generated through a research
project
 Research approaches that engage potential
knowledge-users as partners in the research
process.
 requires a collaborative or participatory
approach to research that is action oriented
and is solutions and impact focused (Mode 2).
 For example, the researcher(s) and
knowledge-user partner(s) jointly define the
research question, and are involved in
interpreting and applying the findings
End of project KT
A broad spectrum of activities including:
Diffusion (let it happen)
Dissemination (help it happen)
 activities that tailor the message and medium to
a specific audience
Application/Implementation (make it happen)
 moving research into practice/policy in cases
where the strength of evidence is sufficient
 use of a conceptual model to guide application
is recommended
Integrated KT
• a way of doing research
• involves engaging and integrating research end users
into the research process
• Collaborative, participatory, action oriented,
community based research, engaged scholarship,
mode 2 knowledge production, co-production of
knowledge
• End users can be:
– Policy- and decision-makers from the community to
the federal level, the public, industry, clinicians,
health system managers, even whole communities
– Researchers from different pillars, disciplines,
teams, countries
Why integrated KT research?
Through partnerships, the research is strengthened:
• end-user involved in developing the research question =
solutions-based research that is relevant
• end user participation in the research process =
confidence in the results and in the researchers
• end-user (patients, health system decision makers,
clinicians) engagement means readiness for the results and
willingness to move those results into practice =
impact (improved health care and outcomes)
So what is KT?
It comprises research, the science of translation, and doing
translation (ie the practice of translation)
Translation research includes: focusing on the translation
gaps and doing research in a collaborative fashion (iKT)
Science of translation (implementation research) is about:
• Studying the determinants of knowledge use and
effective methods of promoting the uptake of knowledge
The practice of translation is about:
• Closing the gap between what we know and what we do
(the reducing the know-do gap)
• Making users aware of knowledge and facilitating their
use of it to improve health and health care systems
• Transforming evidence into practice (moving knowledge
into action)
A Translational Framework
Knowledge
Impact
Translation
KT Research
KT Practice
Health & Social
Systems impacts
Translational gap research
Transl
ational
Integrated KT research
Resea
rch
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision
making
Health impacts
Economic
Implementation research
impacts
Knowledge
Impact
Translation
KT Research
KT Practice
Health & Social
Systems impacts
Translational gap
research
Transl
ational
Integrated KT research
Resea
rch
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision
making
Health impacts
Economic
Implementation research
impacts
Translational Research Gaps
Unmet user needs
Impact
T4
T0
Application/widespread
use
Discovery
Knowledge
Synthesis
T3
T1
Best practice
Innovation
T2
Translational gap research
Translational gaps
Research needed
T0- Translation to discovery- from
identified unmet user needs for
knowledge to discovery
Priority setting research, Needs-based
assessment, epidemiology, synthesis
T1- Translation to humans- from
discovery to (clinical) innovation
First in humans, early phase clinical trials, proof
of principle studies, synthesis
T2- Translation to best practice for
patients/system- from (clinical)
innovation to
recommendations/guidelines/policy
Patient oriented research, later phase clinical
trials, comparative effectiveness, HTA,
knowledge synthesis & guidelines development
research
T3- Translation to practice- from
guidelines to widespread
use/implementation
Implementation science, quality improvement
science, organization and system change
science, scaling up science, synthesis
T4- Translation to impact at population Population based research, population health
level- from widespread use to impact
research, epidemiology, evaluation science,
(measuring impact)
synthesis
Knowledge
Impact
Translation
KT Research
KT Practice
Health & Social
Systems impacts
Translational gap research
Transl
Integrated KT
ational
Researesearch
rch
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision
making
Health impacts
Economic
Implementation research
impacts
Integrated Knowledge Translation
Research
• a way of doing research
• involves engaging and integrating research end users
into the research process
• is a way of thinking about conducting research to
make the results applicable to the population under
study…
• is a paradigm shift that focuses on engagement with
the field and end-users (aligned with participative
science and collaborative research).
Knowledge
Impact
Translation
KT Research
KT Practice
Health & Social
Systems impacts
Translational gap research
Transl
ational
Integrated KT research
Resea
rch
Implementation
research
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision
making
Health impacts
Economic
impacts
Implementation Science
• scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of
research findings into routine healthcare in clinical,
organisational or policy contexts.
– determinants of knowledge use
– effectiveness of methods and interventions to promote
knowledge use (uptake of effective practices and
abandonment of ineffective ones)
• field is theoretically pluralistic and uses mixed
methods
• strong social science/behavioural science influence
on the field
Knowledge
Impact
Translation
KT Research
KT Practice
Health & Social
Systems impacts
Translational gap research
Transl
ational
Integrated KT research
Resea
rch
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision
making
Health impacts
Economic
Implementation research
impacts
Dissemination (help it happen)
(activities that tailor the message and medium
to a specific audience)
• Tailored summary/briefings to stakeholders
• Educational sessions with patients, practitioners and/or
policy makers
• Engaging knowledge users in developing & executing
dissemination/implementation plan
• Tools creation
• Media engagement
• Use of knowledge brokers
Knowledge
Impact
Translation
KT Research
KT Practice
Health & Social
Systems impacts
Translational gap research
Transl
ational
Integrated KT research
Resea
rch
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision
making
Health impacts
Economic
Implementation research
impacts
Application (make it happen)
(moving research into practice in cases where
the strength of evidence is sufficient)
• Understanding the context/environment where research
is to be applied
• Identifying barriers to the uptake of the research findings
• Adapting knowledge, tailoring messages and
interventions to promote uptake
• Evaluating the implementation process and outcomes
• Working within a conceptual framework
One conceptual framework
to consider
• The Knowledge to Action Cycle
• Based on a concept analysis of 31 planned action
theories
• See Graham et al: Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time
for a Map? for details
(http://www.jcehp.com/vol26/2601graham2006.pdf
http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/39033.html)
Monitor
Knowledge
Use
Select, Tailor,
Implement
Interventions
Evaluate
Outcomes
Assess Barriers/
Supports to
Knowledge Use
Start here
Sustain
Knowledge
Use
Adapt
Knowledge
to Local Context
Identify Problem
Identify, Review,
Select Knowledge
Application cycle
KNOWLEDGE CREATION
Knowledge
Inquiry
Synthesis
Products/
Tools
Monitor
Knowledge
Use
Select, Tailor,
Implement
Interventions
Assess Barriers/
Supports to
Knowledge Use
KNOWLEDGE CREATION
Knowledge
Inquiry
Synthesis
Adapt
Knowledge
to Local Context
Evaluate
Outcomes
Products/
Tools
Identify Problem
Identify, Review,
Select Knowledge
Sustain
Knowledge
Use
Lessons learned:
 Moving research-to-practice is an iterative process of
using external evidence and producing local ‘evidence’
for planning, implementing and evaluating
 Successful implementation requires
 strategic alliances between researchers & health
setting (co-production of knowledge)
 population health principles
 needs-based planning
 working at both clinical and health services levels
More lessons learned:
In moving research-to-practice the role of the researcher is
to:
 create & facilitate a strategic alliance and a solutionsfocused collaboration
 bring science of synthesis to practice
 use rigorous methods for each step (organizational
planning, guideline appraisal & adoption, evaluation
of the implementation)
 use a conceptual framework to underpin the research
and KT
More lessons learned:
In moving research-to-practice the role of the
knowledge-users (e.g. providers and policy makers)
is to:
 Identify the problem and engage researchers in
developing the research questions
 Create and facilitate the strategic alliance and
solutions-focused collaboration
 Bring their practice-based knowledge and
experience to bear
 Apply the findings
KT: closing the gap between
evidence and action
How to close the gap between research-to-practice:
 Focus more attention on the organizational and
environmental context for change
 set targets for change
 monitor uptake of the research and evaluate the
health and system outcomes/impact
 keep it simple
 focus on a few important targets, practical indicators
Research Translation Impact
Translational
Research
Translational
Practice
Health & Social Systems
impacts
Translational gap research
Transla
tional
Integrated translational research
Resear
ch
Advances in knowledge
Application
Dissemination
Research
informing
decision making
Health impacts
Economic
Implementation research
impacts
Your reflections on the learning objectives
• To review conceptualizations of KT
• To consider a translational framework
• To better understand the knowledge to action
process
I have been impressed with the urgency of doing.
Knowing is not enough; we must apply.
Being willing is not enough; we must do
Leonardo da Vinci