Transverse transport in disordered superconducting films above T_c

Download Report

Transcript Transverse transport in disordered superconducting films above T_c

Fluctuation conductivity in disordered superconducting films:

Transverse Transport / the Hall and Nernst Effects Usadel equation for fluctuation corrections

Alexander Finkel‘stein

Fluctuation Conductivity in Disordered Superconducting Films: Konstantin Tikhonov (KT) TA&MU Karen Michaeli (KM) Pappalardo Fellow at MIT and Georg Schwiete (GS) FU Berlin

Fluctuation Hall conductivity in Superconducting Films”

N. P. Breznay,

KM, KT, AF

,

and

Aharon Kapitulnik

submitted

The Hall Effect in Superconducting Films” KM, KT, and AF PRB accepted, arXiv 12036121 “Fluctuation Conductivity in Disordered Superconducting Films” KT,GS, and AF PRB 85, 174527 2012

Outlook for two parts of the talk (

I, II

):

I: Effect of fluctuations is more pronounced for the transverse components of the transport (e.g., the Hall and Nernst effects) as compared to the longitudinal components:

 

j j E

    

   

    

E T

 

II :

 We developed an approach to the calculation of fluctuation conductivity in the framework of the Usadel equation. The approach has clear technical advantages compared to the standard diagrammatic techniques.

 We generalized results for fluctuation corrections to arbitrary (B,T) and compared various asymptotic regions with previous studies.

 The approach has also been applied to the calculation of Hall conductivity (and also checked by comparison with the diagrammatic calculation).

 We hope that the formalism proves useful for studies of fluctuations out-of equilibrium and in superconductor-normal metal hybrid systems.

3

The Nernst Coefficient

The Nernst signal  

E y



x T

B

Y. Wang,

et al

2005

 

j j E

    

  

   

E

T e N

E y



x T

  

xy

xx

2

xy

   

xx

 2

xx xy

twice off-diagonal effect / usually “twice“ small / this appeared not true for the superconducting fluctuations

 

Under the approximation of the constant density of states:

j e y

 2

e

2  

C v F

2 

d

x T T

d

  

k

d

 0 

f

 0   

k k

k

 0 For a non-constant density of states  

T F

example of

“twice” smallness This fact makes the Nernst effect very favorable for studying fluctuations a-la para-conductivity (e.g., Aslamazov-Larkin). There is no Drude terms to compete with ! are superconducting fluctuations

Nernst Effect – Conventional Superconductors

The Nernst signal The strong Nernst signal above Tc cannot be explained by the vortex-like fluctuations.  

E y



x T

B Nb

0 .

15

Si

0 .

85 A. Pourret,

et al

2007 the fluctuations of the order parameter cause the effect.

Why the Nernst Signal Created by the Superconducting Fluctuations is so strong, even stronger than in the Hall effect?

         

E



T

    

c T

F

 

c T

c

  

c

4

eDH c

twice off-diagonal effect / usually “twice“ small / not true for the discussed problem no need for “particle-hole” asymmetry in the fluctuation propagator to get the transverse thermo-electric coefficient

xy (unlike

xx or

xy , which are only “once” transverse ) “Particle-Hole” asymmetry:

L R

L A

(   )

Agreement with the experiment (no fitting parameters; T C and diffusion coefficient were taken from independent measurements)

Karen Michaeli & AF

Experimental data from A. Pourret, et al 2007

Nb

0 .

15

T Si C

0 .

85 film of thickness 35

nm

 380

mK D

 0 .

187

cm

2 sec “Fluctuations of the superconducting order parameter as an origin of the Nernst Effect”

EPL, 86 (2009); Phys Rev B 80 (2009)

“Quantum kinetic approach for studying thermal transport in the presence of electron electron interactions and disorder”

Phys Rev B 80 (2009) Serbin et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009

8

the Hall Signal Created by the Superconducting Fluctuations N. P. Breznay

et al. submitted

9

Fluctuation corrections to conductivity due to SC fluctuations: phenomenology

Shortcomings Advantage: physical transperancy

10

The Hall effect very close to Tc; result that can be obtained by the phenomenological approach A. Aronov, S. Hikami, and A.Larkin (1995)

L R

L A

(   ) 11

KM, KT, and AF submitted , arXiv 12036121

12

the Hall Signal Created by the Superconducting Fluctuations

KM, KT, and AF PRB accepted, arXiv 12036121 Two types of the contributions depending on the mechanism of deflection in the transverse direction: quasiparticles or superconducting modes The standard set of the diagrams (but in the case of Hall, lot of cancellations!) plus the overlooked one, which is a reminiscent of the DOS correction to the Hall conductivity.

flux technique (M. Khodas and A.F. 2003)

13

B-T Phase Diagram 14

B-T Phase Diagram T ordered QCP r B-induced QCP 15

Transverse transport in the vicinity of the critical points; there are regions where Hall correction does not depend on 

C

Hall effect

 

C

e

2    ln  1

C

  2  

signH

 

T e

2  ln  1

C

 

C e

2 ln ln  1  

C

4

eHD c C

 16

The Nernst Coefficient

e N

E y



x T

  

xy

xx

2

xy

   

xx

 2

xx xy

   

   

 

E



T

 

e N

xy

xx

α xx contributes negligible in comparison to α xy The Peltier coefficient is related to the flow of entropy 

c

 4

eDH c

According to the third law of thermodynamics 

0 when

T

0 17

The Peltier Coefficient near the quantum critical point

 

C

T

H

ln

H C

 1 ln    

H C H

     

T

 

C

xy

  

e

ln 3

C

( ) 

signH

Since the transverse signal is non-dissipative the sign of the effect is not fixed.

Transverse transport in the vicinity of the critical point is very peculiar 18

Fit of the data obtained by the Kapitulnik group

N. P. Breznay,

KM, KT, AF

,

and

Aharon Kapitulnik, submitted 19

Usadel equation: the bridge between phenomenology and diagrammatics

(Eilenberger 1968; Usadel 1970)

Start with action with electron-electron interaction in the Cooper channel decoupled via D (Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation): Single particle Hamiltonian: where There is a separation of scales: Low energy physics in the diffusive limit is contained in the reduced function 20

Usadel equation: cont.

One can write closed (nonlinear) equation for the reduced g: Current density can also be expressed in terms of g: Averaging with respect to: with Closed scheme Gaussian approximation 21

Usadel equation: solution

In the regime of Gaussian fluctuations, the solution of the Usadel equation can be found by a perturbative expansion around the metallic solution: with Fermi distribution scalar potential GL action can be written as follows 22

For B=0 a similar formalism was developed by Volkov et al (1998) and more recently by Kamenev and Levchenko (2007)

Three mechanisms of the corrections

 d is the correction to the quasiparticle density of states as would be measured by a tunneling probe  d D is the renormalization of the diffusion coefficient due to coherent Andreev scattering  j s is the supercurrent density f, f* etc. parametrize deviations of g from the metallic solution, f~C D 23

Fluctuation corrections to conductivity due to superconducting fluctuations

 Kubo formula  Disorder dressing  Both fermionic and bosonic degrees present

B-T Phase Diagram for the longitudinal transport III Asymptotic results for fluctuation conductivity - contact with known limiting cases I II IV

kOm Resistance curves for different temperatures II “criticality” zoomed image Magnetotransport starting in the region of the QCP and for large magnetic fields

The quantum critical regime

There are two distinct regimes: Low temperature: Sign change!

Classical regime: We recover the result obtained by Galitski, Larkin (2001) [In contrast to more recent study by Glatz, Varlamov, Vinokur (2011)]

Fluctuation conductivity in superconducting films Effect of fluctuations is more pronounced for the transverse components of the transport as compared to the longitudinal components:

Here we demonstrate a theoretical fit of the recent data obtained by the A. Kapitulnik group (Stanford) for the Hall conductivity in superconducting Tantalum Nitride (TaN

x

) films.* A large contribution to the Hall conductivity near the superconducting transition arising due to the fluctuations has been tracked to temperatures well above

Tc=2.75K

and magnetic fields well above the upper critical field,

Hc2

. Quantitative agreement has been found between the data and the calculations based on the microscopic analysis of the superconducting fluctuations in the disordered films.

* Studying fluctuation effects in the Hall conductivity is an experimental challenge in systems with high carrier concentration and large longitudinal resistance. N. P. Breznay et. al submitted Phys. Rev. B

Conclusion

 We developed an approach to the calculation of fluctuation conductivity in the framework of the Usadel equation. The approach has clear technical advantages compared to diagrammatic techniques.

Calculation can be performed in the scalar gauge rather than with the tme dependent vector potential (no analytical cntinuation is needed).

 We generalized results for fluctuation corrections to arbitrary (B,T) and compared various asymptotic regions with previous studies (where asymptotics are calculated separately).

 The approach has also been applied to the calculation of the Hall conductivity.

 The approach provides a more transparent physical structure. We hope that the formalism proves useful for studies of fluctuations out-of equilibrium and in superconductor-normal metal hybrid systems.

29

Almost vertical  Intersection point

Magnetoresistance

0.35 K 0.76 K Line of maxima in magnetoresistance TiN-film, Tc~0.6 K Baturina et al. (2003)

Our fit of the data obtained by the Kapitulnik group

N. P. Breznay

et al. 2012

The quantum critical regime

There are two distinct regimes: Low temperature: Sign change!

Classical regime: We recover the result obtained by Galitski, Larkin (2001) [In contrast to more recent study by Glatz, Varlamov, Vinokur (2011)]