reflector savings
Download
Report
Transcript reflector savings
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
CH.IV : CRITICALITY CALCULATIONS
IN DIFFUSION THEORY
CRITICALITY
• ONE-SPEED DIFFUSION
• MODERATION KERNELS
REFLECTORS
• INTRODUCTION
• REFLECTOR SAVINGS
• TWO-GROUP MODEL
1
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
IV.1 CRITICALITY
Objective
solutions of the diffusion eq. in a finite homogeneous
criticality
media exist without external sources
A time-independent can be sustained in the reactor with no Q
1st study case: bare homogeneous reactor (i.e. without reflector)
ONE-SPEED DIFFUSION
With fission !!
Helmholtz equation
with
B
2
D ( r ) a ( r ) f ( r )
(r ) B (r ) 0
2
f a
D
and BC at the extrapolated boundary: ( rs n d e ) 0
: solution of the corresponding eigenvalue problem
2
2
2
countable set of eigenvalues:
0 B o B1 B 2 ...
2
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
+ associated eigenfunctions: orthogonal basis
A unique solution positive everywhere fundamental mode
Flux !
Eigenvalue of the fundamental – two ways to express it:
1.
B
2
g
o
o
= geometric buckling
= f(reactor geometry)
2. B
2
m
f a
D
= material buckling
= f(materials)
2
2
Criticality: B g B m
Core displaying a given composition (Bm cst): determination of the size
(Bg variable) making the reactor critical
Core displaying a given geometry (Bg cst): determination of the required
enrichment (Bm)
3
4
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Time-dependent problem
J
-K
( J K ) ( r ) f ( r ) D ( r ) a ( r )
Diffusion operator:
Spectrum of real eigenvalues: o 1 2 ...
s.t.
i f a DB i
2
Bi ( )
2
with
o = maxi i associated to B o2 : min eigenvalue of (-) o
associated to o: positive all over the reactor volume
Time-dependent diffusion:
1 (r , t )
v
t
( J K ) ( r , t )
Eigenfunctions i: orthogonal basis ( r , t )
(r , t )
c i ( 0 ) i ( r ) e
i vt
c i ( t ) i ( r )
i
i
o < 0 : subcritical state
o > 0 : supercritical state
t
c o ( 0 ) o ( r )
o = 0 : critical state with ( r , t )
5
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Unique possible solution of the criticality problem whatever the
2
2
IC:
2
DB DB
DB
i
f
a
o
i
m
g
Criticality and multiplication factor
keff : production / destruction ratio
Close to criticality: ( r ) o ( r )
k eff
J o
K o
f
a DB
2
f
1
a 1 L B
2
2
o = fundamental eigenfunction associated to the eigenvalue
1
keff of:
K J
media:
k
Finite media:
Improvement:
f
a
k eff
k
f
f
1 L B
2
2
k eff pf . Pth
fPth
pf
1 L B
2
2
and criticality for keff = 1
with
Bm
2
pf 1
L
2
6
Independent sources
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Eigenfunctions i : orthonormal basis
( K J ) ( r ) Q ( r )
Q (r )
i
i
i
(r )
i
Qi
DB
2
i
a
i (r )
f
Subcritical case with sources: possible steady-state solution
(r )
Qo
o
o (r )
Qo
DB
2
o
a
o (r )
f
Weak dependence on the expression of Q, mainly if o(<0) 0
Subcritical reactor: amplifier of the fundamental mode of Q
Same flux obtainable with a slightly subcritical reactor +
source as with a critical reactor without source
7
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
MODERATION KERNELS
Objective: improve the treatment of the
dependence on E w.r.t. one-speed diffusion
Definitions
P ( ro r , E ) = moderation kernel: proba density function that 1
n due to a fission in ro is slowed down below energy E in r
q ( r , E ) = moderation density: nb of n (/unit vol.time) slowed
down below E in r
q ( r , E th )
P ( ro r , E th ) f th ( ro ) d ro
V
with
D th ( r ) a th ( r ) q ( r , E th )
P ( ro r , E )
media: translation invariance
Finite media: no invariance approximation
f (| r ro |)
Solution in an media: use of Fourier transform
3/2
( a DB )ˆ ( B ) ( 2 ) Pˆ ( B , E th ) f ˆ ( B )
2
( 2 )
3/2
Pˆ ( B , E th )
f
a DB
1 Bm
2
2
8
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Inverting the previous expression: ( r )
solution of
A ( u ). e
iB m u . r
du
( r ) B m ( r ) 0
2
Solution in finite media
Additional condition: B2 {eigenvalues} of (-) with BC on the
2
2
2
extrapolated boundary B B o B g
Criticality condition:
with
2
Bm
( 2 )
3/2
solution of
( 2 )
Bm Bg
2
3/2
Pˆ ( B , E th ) P ( B , E th )
2
Pˆ ( B m , E th )
f
1 L B
2
2
m
1
: fast non-leakage proba
9
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Examples of moderation kernels
Two-group diffusion
Fast group:
e
P ( r , E th ) r 1
1r
4 D1 r
f
Criticality eq.:
1 L B
2
2
2
.
1
1 L B
2
1
2
r1
P ( B , E th )
1
D1 1 B
2
2
1
1 L1 B
2
2
1
G-group diffusion
G 1
P ( B , E th )
i 1
Criticality eq.:
1
2
1 Li B
2
2
f
1 (
G
i 1
2
i
L )B
2
Criticality eq.:
fe
2
i 1
2
Li ) B
2
r / ( E )
2
2
1 L B
2
1 (
G 1
1
Age-diffusion (see Chap.VII) P ( r , E )
B
1
2
L i B 1
1
e
( 4 ( E ))
3/2
P ( B , E th ) e
B
2
(E) = age of n at en. E emitted at the fission en.
= age of thermal n emitted at the fission en.
10
IV.2 REFLECTORS
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
INTRODUCTION
No bare reactor
Thermal reactors
Reflector
backscatters n into the core
Slows down fast n (composition similar to the moderator)
Reduction of the quantity of fissile material necessary to
reach criticality reflector savings
Fast reactors
n backscattered into the core? Degraded spectrum in E
Fertile blanket (U238) but leakage from neutronics standpoint
Not considered here
11
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
REFLECTOR SAVINGS
One-speed diffusion model
In the core:
D ( r ) a ( r ) f ( r )
( r ) B ( r ) 0 with
2
c
f a
D
f 1
L
2
k 1
L
2
D R ( r ) aR ( r ) 0
In the reflector:
(r )
B
2
c
1
L
2
R
(r ) 0
Solution of the diffusion eq. in each of the m zones solution
depending on 2.m constants to be determined
Use of continuity relations, boundary conditions, symmetry
constraints… to obtain 2.m constraints on these constants
Homogeneous system of algebraic equations: non-trivial
solution iff the determinant vanishes
Criticality condition
12
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Solution in planar geometry
Consider a core of thickness 2a and reflector of thickness b
(extrapolated limit)
Problem symmetry
( x)
( x)
0 xa
A cos B c x
x
E sinh
C cosh
LR
x
L
R
a x ab
Flux continuity + BC:
( x)
( x)
A cos B c x
A
cos B c a
b
LR
sinh
a b | x |
sinh
LR
0 xa
a x ab
Current continuity:
DB c tan B c a
DR
LR
coth
b
LR
criticality eq.
Q: A = ?
13
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Criticality reached for a thickness 2a satisfying this condition
2
a
For a bare reactor:
o
Bc
Reflector savings:
ao a
In the criticality condition:
As Bc << 1 :
D
DR
tan B c
L R tanh
a
2 Bc
DB c
DR
L R tanh
b
LR
b
LR
If same material for both reflector and moderator, with a D little
affected by the proportion of fuel D DR
L R tanh
b L R : b
b
LR
b L R : L R
Criticality: possible calculation with bare reactor accounting for
14
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
TWO-GROUP MODEL
Core
D1 1 ( r ) a 11 ( r ) s 11 ( r ) f 11 ( r ) f 2 2 ( r )
D 2 2 ( r ) a 2 2 ( r ) s11 ( r )
Reflector
D R 1 1 ( r ) R 1 1 ( r ) 0
D R 2 2 ( r ) R 2 2 ( r ) R 1 1 ( r )
i B i
2
Planar geometry: solutions s.t.
D1 B 2 a 1 s1
s1
f1
?
1 0
2
D 2 B a 2 2 0
f 2
Solution iff determinant = 0
2nd-degree eq. in B2
2
B
1 , 2 (one positive and one negative roots)
2
D2 B a2
1
For each root:
2
s1
15
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
Solution in the core for [-a, a]:
1 ( x ) A1 cos B1 x A 2 cosh B 2 x
2 ( x ) A1
s1
D2 B a2
2
1
cos B1 x A 2
s1
D2 B a2
2
2
cosh B 2 x
Solution in the reflector for a x a+b:
abx
1 ( x ) A3 sinh
2 ( x ) A3
L1 R
R1 / D R 2
1
2
LR 2
1
2
LR1
sinh
abx
L1 R
A 4 sinh
abx
L2 R
4 constants + 4 continuity equations (flux and current in each
group)
Homogeneous linear system
Annulation of the determinant to obtain a solution
Criticality condition
Q: the flux is then given
to a constant. Why?
16
PHYS-H406 – Nuclear Reactor Physics – Academic year 2013-2014
fast flux
thermal flux
core
reflector
17