Transcript PPT
Studying the Microphysics of Magnetic Reconnection in the Earth’s Magnetosphere and the Solar Wind Electron Heating
Michael Shay Department of Physics and Astronomy Precursor: presentations/2012-09-swarthmore-colloquium/presentation.pptx, but I converted to keynote and threw out a huge number of slides. University of Delaware
Collaborators
• Colby Haggerty – Univ of Delaware • Tai Phan Marit Oieroset – Berkeley • Masaaki Fujimoto • Paul Cassak – Univ of West Virginia • Jim Drake – Univ of Maryland
Space Weather
• The nature of changing environmental conditions in space.
– Plasma: A gas of charged particles.
A Solar Flare
• Explosive energy release – Up to 10 32 ergs 3 x 10 18 kW-hr – Takes ~ 20 minutes – Equivalent to: 40 billion atomic bombs(!) 2005 human energy consumption: 1.4 x 10 14 kW-hr QuickTime™ and a Photo decompressor are needed to see this picture.
Data from TRACE Spacecraft
Auroral Substorms
• All Sky Images – Nishimura et al., GRL, 115, A07222, 2010.
QuickTime™ and a Motion JPEG OpenDML decompressor are needed to see this picture.
Overview
• Plasma Physics Primer • What is Magnetic Reconnection?
• Electron Heating due to Magnetic Reconnection
Overview
• Plasma Physics Primer • What is Magnetic Reconnection?
• Electron Heating due to Magnetic Reconnection
Plasma - Large Scale Behavior
To Sun Electrons (-
MHD Magnetohydrodynamics
Ions (+) )
MHD - Magnetohydrodynamics
• • Fluid Equations – Slow Timescales – Large length scales Key Physics – Magnetic field lines act like rubber tubes • Alfven Speed : – Plasma “Frozen-in” to the magnetic field • Magnetic Topology is conserved:
d m i n dt
V
B
g
B
4
nT
B
2 8
t
B
t n
c
g nV
E E
V
c
B
Magnetic Topology is Conserved
=> Magnetic field lines can’t be cut.
Everything Breaks Eventually
Formation of Boundary Layers
Boundary Layers
• Tiny layers that separate distinct regions – Small scales => Different Physics – “Effective Larmor Radius:” Inertial Length • δ = c/ω p • Plasma – Different magnetic fields – Diffusion region
Overview
• Plasma Physics Primer • What is Magnetic Reconnection?
• Electron Heating due to Magnetic Reconnection
Magnetic Reconnection
V in C A • Simplistic 2D picture • Change of magnetic topology – Releases magnetic energy Diffusion Region MHD not valid
Magnetic Reconnection
J z and Magnetic Field Lines QuickTime™ and a GIF decompressor are needed to see this picture.
Reconnection Rate
D V in B V out V in B • – • Reconnection Rate: n V in D ~ m i n V out δ V E in ~ (δ/D) c out-of-plane A ~ V in B V out δ
Reconnection in Solar Flares
• X-class flare: ~ 100 sec.
• τ A ~ L/c A ~ 10 sec.
• Fast!
– Every day analogy: Speed of sound F. Shu, 1992
• d Reconnection drives macroscale flows Energizes particles Kivelson et al., 1995
A Multi-Scale Challenge
• Reconnection – Microscale process – Macroscale effects Diffusion region scales: 1 km • Complete description – Model Macroscales – Resolve Microscales – Impossible!
• Grand Challenge Problem 300,000 km Kivelson et al., 1995
Unsolved Reconnection Questions
• What makes it turn on and off?
• Where does the energy go?
– Flows, electron or ion heating?
• What about 3 Dimensions?
• Turbulence?
• But you’ve been studying it for 50 years!
Overview
• Plasma Physics Primer • What is Magnetic Reconnection?
• Electron Heating due to Magnetic Reconnection
Observing Magnetic Reconnection
• In-situ satellite measurements
MMS Mission
• • Specifically devoted to studying magnetic explosions – Cost: $1 billion – Launch date: 2014 – 4 satellite mission MMS Movie
Example of magnetopause reconnection with electron heating
THEMIS-D
jet
70 eV heating THEMIS-D
jet
Electron bulk heating seen in some regions, not in others
jet jet
Solar Wind: No heating (Gosling, 2007)
jet
Magnetopause: 10s of eV gain in T e (Gosling et al., 1990) Magnetotail: keV heating
Heating in Plasmas
• H-Theorem – Gas/Plasma in thermodynamic equilibrium relaxes to a maxwellian particle distribution. • Adiabatic Heating – Compression. Does work. Leads to heating.
• Requires thermodynamic equilibrium.
• Maxwellian velocity distribution • Joule Heating – Scatter current. Generate heat.
– Requires collisions • Solar Corona/Solar Wind/Magnetosphere – Almost collisionless!
– Not in thermodynamic equilibrium!
Ion Distribution Function
• Multiple populations • Non of which are Maxwellian
Electron Distribution Functions: Simulation
• Chen et al., 2008 T || > T ⊥ Multiple Species Maxwellian
Fluid Description not Adequate
• Kinetic representation: Boltzmann Equation • f (x,v) • Two options – Discretize x and v • 5 dimensions - Expensive!
– Random particles: Follow trajectories
Simulating Kinetic Reconnection
• Finite Difference – Fluid quantities exist at grid points.
• E,B treated as fluids always – Maxwell’s equations • Kinetic Particle in Cell – E,B fluids – Ions and electrons are particles.
– Stepping fluids: particle quantities averaged to grid.
– Stepping particles: Fluids interpolated to particle position.
Grid cell Macro-particle
• Include all kinetic physics – Simplistic simulation geometry – Simplistic boundary conditions • Basic physics simulations – What is the basic physics controlling electron heating during magnetic reconnection?
• Massively parallel simulations – 4000 - 16000 cores – 100 billion particles • Strong union of simulations/theory • Comparisons with observations
Simulation Parameters
• Normalizations: L 0 = d i = c/ω pi , t 0 = (Ω ci ) -1 • Simulation Size: 204.8 d i X 102.4 d i • Grid: Δ = 0.05 d i • m i /m e = 25, 100, c = 15, 30 • Boundary conditions: periodic • Equilibrium: Double Harris equilibrium • Simulate until quasi-steady – Time average over a few (Ω ci ) -1 • Coordinates: “Simulation Coordinates” – Outflow: x – Inflow: y – Out-of-plane: z
Initial Conditions
• • • • • Basic Reconnection Simulations Double current sheet – Reconnects robustly – Periodic boundary conditions Initial x-line perturbation Excellent Testbed for studying basic properties of reconnection Does not include many boundary condition effects Reconnection Rate Z t = 0 Z t = 1200 Current along Z Time Time Density X X
Simulation Parameters 3
• Observational events are often in a parameter regime not typically simulated – β relatively small in simulations – Example: GEM Challenge had β ≈ 0.2
T i /T e Te (eV) ~ 5 Te ∞ 1/ e, rec 0.5
e, rec 5.0
nkT e /(B rec 2 /2 0 )
Table of All Most Simulations
Run #
• Currently about 50 simulations
B reconn B guide n inflow T e T i B 2 301
1.00
0.20
302 303 304 305 306 run307 run311 run308001 run312001 run309 run313 run315 run316 run310001 run314001 run317001 run318001 run319 run320 run321 run322 run323 run324 run325
1 1 0 1 0.2
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.447
0 1 0 0.2
0.2
0.25
2.25
2.25
0.25
1 0.2
0.2
0.25
2.25
2.25
0.25
1.00
2.00
2.00
0 1 1.0
1.0
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
1.00
2.00
0 0.2
2.236
2.236
0 2.236
0.2
0.2
0.25
1 1 1 0.447
1 0.447
0 0.2
0.04
0.25
0.25
0.25
2.25
0.04
0.25
2.25
– T i 1 0 /T e 1 0.04
= 1 to 10 0.04
2.25
2.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
2.25
2.25
0.20
0.40
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
2.236
2.236
0 2.236
0.2
0.2
2.25
2.25
0.25
0.25
0.447
0.447
1 0 0.447
0 0.2
0.2
1.0
0.25
0.25
0.25
2.25
2.25
2.25
10.00
0.20
0.40
1.00
1 0 1 0 1.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.0625
2.25
1.25
1.25
0.3125
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
0.20
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
0.60
0.60
0.15
β
⊥ 0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.90
0.02
0.02
0.18
0.18
0.02
0.02
0.18
0.18
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.10
0.10
0.03
run326 run327 run328 run329 run330
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0625
1 1 2.5
2.5
0.3125
5 5 12.5
12.5
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
0.15
2.40
2.40
6.00
6.00
0.03
0.40
0.40
1.00
1.00
β
⊥
e
0.10
0.10
0.90
0.90
0.10
0.10
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.18
0.18
0.02
0.02
0.18
0.18
0.02
0.02
4.50
4.50
4.50
4.50
0.50
0.50
0.13
0.13
2.00
2.00
5.00
5.00
β
⊥
i
0.20
0.10
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
5.00
2.50
5.00
2.50
0.60
0.30
0.15
0.08
2.40
1.20
6.00
3.00
β total
Y Y
Determination of Heating
V ez B x , B y , B z X B z J x , J y , J z X E y Y V ix , V iy , V iz X • Slice 20 ion inertial lengths downstream of x line. T e|| , T e ⊥ Y Y Y Y
Effect of β?
• β = thermal energy/magnetic energy ΔT e WARNING: DTetot_max is actually DTepar_max + 2*DTeperp_max β r_tot
Energy Budget
D V in B V out V in B • α = percentage of available energy V out δ
Scaling of Electron Heating
• Energy Conservation • Important Questions – What is α Te ?
– Is it a constant for a variation of inflow conditions?
• If α Te is constant:
Scaling with Alfven Speed: T
e_tot • Scaling evident – α Te ΔT e_tot is independent of inflow parameters!
(C Ar ) 2
Energy Budget
• Plot versus 1/2 (C Ar ) 2 • Slope of line = 0.12
– 12% of energy into electron heating?
• Average heating in exhaust – Slope of 5% • 5% of magnetic energy converted into heating.
ΔT e_max ΔT e_av 12% 5% 1/2 m i (C Ar ) 2 1/2 m i (C Ar ) 2
Statistical survey of the degree of electron heating at magnetopause 1. Identify reconnection exhausts 2. Determine Te • Determine boundary conditions: , guide field, etc… V A magnetosphere magnetosheath spacecraft
Observations Slope= 0.069
inflow V A,rec (km/s) m i V A,rec 2 /2 (eV) Te V A,rec 2 Te = 0.069 m V A 2 /2 = 0.069 B rec 2 /(2 0 N) • Simulations: 5% into electron heating • Observations: 7% into electron heating
Degree of heating depends on V A V A,rec (km/s) • Solar wind: V A ~ 50 km/s -> practically no heating • Magnetopause: inflow V A ~ 50-400 km/s • Magnetotail: inflow V A ~ 2000 km/s -> 1.4 keV
Component Reconnection
• • Reconnecting field lines may not be anti-parallel Can think of as: – anti-parallel reconnection – add a uniform B-field perpendicular to reconnection plane.
– Guide field.
Kivelson and Russel, 1995 Gosling, 1990 45
Y
One Stark Effect: Guide Field
Y • B g = B r – Almost no perpendicular heating!
T e|| B x , B y , B z V ix , V iy , V iz Y X Y T e ⊥ T e|| , T e ⊥ X Y
Anisotropy
ΔT e|| All B g • Striking – In General: ΔT e|| ≳ ΔT e ⊥ – Guide field Case: No ΔT e ⊥ – Guide field has larger ΔT e|| ?
ΔT e|| B g = 0 ΔT e|| B g = B r ΔT e ⊥ All B g (C Ar ) 2 ΔT e ⊥ B g = 0 (C Ar ) 2 ΔT e ⊥ B g = B r (C Ar ) 2 (C Ar ) 2 (C Ar ) 2 (C Ar ) 2
Observations: Guide field suppresses perpendicular heating T e < T e|| T e|| (eV) magnetic shear > 150 o (guide field < 0.3) magnetic shear < 120 o (guide field > 0.6) T e ~ 0.75
T e|| T e << T e|| T e|| (eV) T e|| (eV)
Conflicting findings on anisotropy of electron heating: Guide field effect Magnetosheath: T e|| heating only Guide field ~ 1 Magnetotail: ~Isotropic heating [Chen et al., 2008]
jet
Magnetotail guide field ~ 0
Unanswered Question
• What if T e /T i > 5?
– May effect heating • What is the physical mechanism behind the heating?
• Acceleration at x-line (e.g. Pritchett et al., 2006, Ashour Abdalla et al.) • Acceleration in high field regions (e.g. Birn et al., 2000, 2004, Hoshino et al. 2001) • Contracting Islands (e.g. Drake et al., 2006) • Turbulent electric fields (e.g. Dmitruck et al., 2004) • Parallel Electric Fields (e.g. Egedal et al., 2012) • What if there are many x-lines? (Solar Flares) • Turbulent Reconnection?
Conclusions
• Magnetic Reconnection – Magnetic Energy Release in Plasma – Multiscale problemf • Satellite Observations and PIC Simulations – Range of inflow parameters, guide field • Simulation/Observations Find Similar Scaling – ΔT e scales with (C Ar ) 2 for wide range of parameters • Universal process – Guide Field Effect • ΔT e ⊥ shut off for guide field.
– Physics: Isotropization?
– Electron Thermal Heating is Generic
Physics?
Y • Now comes the hard part.
• Focus is on exhaust region – No strong compression at dipole fields, etc.
• Easier to create T e|| – Contracting Island Model – E || near x-line and separatrices • Important issue: Isotropization V ez – Example: Scattering at strongly curved field lines e Y X X
What Controls Electron Bulk (Thermal) Heating in Reconnection? Answer: V A 2 and guide field V A Tai Phan, Mike Shay, Masaki Fujimoto, et al.
Reconnection converts magnetic energy into: - Kinetic energy (plasma jetting) - Ion heating - Electron heating -> Thermal and Supra-Thermal assumed to always happen, but not true
Electron bulk heating seen in some regions, not in others
jet jet jet
Solar Wind: No heating (Gosling, 2007) Magnetopause: 10s of eV gain in T e (Gosling et al., 1990) Magnetotail: keV heating The degree of electron bulk heating must depend on plasma regime
Turbulent Reconnection
• This smooth reconnection may be the exception.
Solar Wind is Strongly Turbulent
• What is the nature of reconnection in turbulence?
Solar Turbulence
QuickTime™ and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture.
Hinode (G-band 430nm and Ca II H 397nm) • Granules – 1000km across – Convection cells across entire sun
The Solar Wind
QuickTime™ and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture.
STEREO Spacecraft • Continuous wind – Supersonic – Magnetic Field
QuickTime™ and a GIF decompressor are needed to see this picture.
59