Math

Download Report

Transcript Math

PARCC

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers www.parcconline.org

Stay informed!

l i o n n w w .

w p a r c c Enter email here

The latest news…

PARCC States

Important Acronyms

 EOY – End of Year  PBA/ MYA – Performance Based Assessment/ Mid Year Assessment  CCSS – Common Core State Standards  CCSSM- Common Core State Standards Math  MP – Mathematical Practices  ELA –English Language Arts  PLD – Performance Level Descriptor

Important Attached Documents

PARCC Glossary PARCC Fact Sheet PARCC FAQs PARCC Milestones/ Timeline Arkansas Achieve Sheet Location of PARCC documents 8 Mathematical Practices PARCC High Level Blueprints-Mathematics Grade 3 PBA/MYA Evidence Table Algebra II PBA/ MYA Evidence Table Performance Level Descriptors-Algebra II Performance Level Descriptors-Grade 3 PARCC Model Content Frameworks-Algebra II PARCC Model Content Frameworks-Grade 3

Arkansas Curriculum Frameworks

Math

• Grades K-8 are identical to the CCSS for those grades • Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 contain standards from a variety of high school math CCSS.

• For example, the Arkansas Algebra 2 course contains standards listed in the High School: Geometry CCSS, High School: Algebra CCSS, and others

Common Core State Standards

ELA/ Literacy

8 Mathematical Practices

1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.

2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.

3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

4. Model with mathematics.

5. Use appropriate tools strategically.

6. Attend to precision.

7. Look for and make use of structure.

8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Big Shifts in ELA/Literacy



Appropriate Text Complexity



Increased Reading of Informational Texts



Disciplinary Literacy



Close Reading



Text-dependent Questions



General Academic and Domain-specific Vocabulary



Argumentative Writing



Short and Sustained Research Projects

K-2 Assessments

 The tasks will consist of developmentally appropriate assessment types, such as     observations checklists classroom activities protocols, which reflect foundational aspects of the Common Core State Standards .

3-8 Assessments

 2 Summative Assessments 1.

PBA - Administered after approximately 75% of the school year 

ELA

will focus on writing effectively when analyzing text 

Math

focus on applying skills, concepts, and understandings to solve multi-step problems requiring abstract reasoning, precision, perseverance, and strategic use of tools.

3-8 Assessments cont’d

EOY - Administered after approximately 90% of the school year 

ELA

will focus on reading comprehension 

Math

will call on students to demonstrate further conceptual understanding of the Major Content and Additional and Supporting Content of the grade and demonstrate mathematical fluency.

3 8 Assessments Cont’d

 Optional Non-Summative Assessments 

Diagnostic Assessment

- designed to be an indicator of student knowledge and skills so that instruction, supports, and professional development can be tailored to meet student needs.



MYA

- comprised of performance-based items and tasks, with an emphasis on hard-to-measure standards. 

Speaking and Listening (ELA/ Literacy only

) designed to be an indicator of students’ ability to communicate their own ideas, listen to and comprehend the ideas of others, and to integrate and evaluate information from multimedia sources.

High School Assessments

 2 Summative Components 1.

PBA - Administered after approximately 75% of the school year 

ELA

will focus on writing effectively when analyzing text 

Math

focus on mathematical reasoning and modeling real world problems

High School Assessments cont’d

EOY - Administered after approximately 90% of the school year  ELA will focus on reading comprehension 

Math

will call on students to demonstrate further conceptual understanding of the Major Content and Additional and Supporting Content of the grade and demonstrate mathematical fluency.

High School Assessments cont’d

 Optional Non-Summative Assessments 

Diagnostic Assessment

- designed to be an indicator of student knowledge and skills so that instruction, supports, and professional development can be tailored to meet student needs.



MYA

- comprised of performance-based items and tasks, with an emphasis on hard-to-measure standards. 

Speaking and Listening (ELA/ Literacy only

) designed to be an indicator of students’ ability to communicate their own ideas, listen to and comprehend the ideas of others, and to integrate and evaluate information from multimedia sources.

High School Assessments

 The high school assessments will include range of item types, including: a    innovative constructed response extended performance tasks selected response (all of which will be computer based). **In addition, there will be college-ready cut scores on high school tests in mathematics and

ELA/Literacy

, which will signify whether students are ready for entry level, credit-bearing college coursework. Earlier tests will be aligned vertically to ensure students are on and stay on - the track to graduating ready for college and careers.

Model Content Frameworks

 serves as a bridge between CCSS and the PARCC assessments  were developed to help design items for the PARCC tests and to support educators’ implementation of the Common Core.

Model Content Frameworks

Math

Grades 3-8     This document for each grade addresses the following:     Examples of Key Advances from Grade # to # Fluency Expectations or Examples of Culminating Standards Examples of Major Within-Grade Dependencies Examples of Opportunities for Connections among Standards, Clusters or Domains Examples of Opportunities for In-Depth Focus Examples of Opportunities for Connecting Mathematical Content and Mathematical Practices Content Emphases by Cluster Examples of Linking Supporting Clusters to the Major Work of the Grade

Model Content Frameworks

Math

Grade 3 Example

Model Content Frameworks

Math

Grade 3 Example

Model Content Frameworks

Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II This document for each grade addresses the following:   Course Overview Examples of Key Advances from Previous Grades or Courses  Discussion of Mathematical Practices in Relation to Course Content    Fluency Recommendations Pathway Summary Table: AI-G-AII Pathway Assessment Limits for Standards Assessed on More than one End of Course Test

Model Content Frameworks

Math

Algebra II Example

Model Content Frameworks

Math

Algebra II Example

Model Content Frameworks

Math

Algebra II Example

Model Content Frameworks

ELA/Literacy

Grades 3-11 This document for each grade addresses the following:  Narrative Summary of ELA/ Literacy Standards for Grade #   ELA/ Literacy Content Frameworks Chart for Grade # Key Terms and Concepts for Grade # ELA/ Literacy Model Content Framework Chart  Reading Complex Texts     Writing to Texts Research Project For Reading and Writing in Each Module For Reading Foundation Skills in Each Module   Writing Standards Progression from Grades # to # Speaking and Listening Standards Progression from Grade # to Grade #

Model Content Frameworks

ELA/Literacy

Grades 3-11

Model Content Frameworks

ELA/Literacy

Grades 3-11

Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs)

Performance Level Descriptors

 indicate the knowledge, skills and practices that students should be able to demonstrate at each performance level, in each content area (ELA/literacy and mathematics), at each grade.  Content- and grade level-specific PLDs are designed to inform test item development, the setting of performance level cut scores, and curriculum and instruction at the local level.

Performance Level Descriptors

Math

Grades 3-6

5 Sub-Claims

: The student solves problems involving the MAJOR CONTENT for the grade/ course with connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice B: The student solves problems involving the ADDITONAL and SUPPORTING CONTENT for the grade/ course with the connections to the Standards for Mathematical Practice.

Performance Level Descriptors

Math

Grades 3-6

5 Sub-Claims

: The student expresses grade/ course-level appropriate mathematical REASONING by constructing arguments, critiquing the reasoning of others and/ or attending to precision when making mathematical statements.

Performance Level Descriptors

Math

Grades 3-6

5 Sub-Claims 

: The student solves real-world problems with a degree of difficulty appropriate to the grade/course by APPLYING knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for the current grade/course (or for more complex problems, knowledge and skills articulated in the standards for previous grades/courses), engaging particularly in the MODELING practice, and where helpful making sense of problems and persevering to solve them, reasoning abstractly and quantitatively, using appropriate tools strategically, looking for the making use of structure, and/or looking for and expressing regularity in repeated reasoning.

Performance Level Descriptors

Math

Grades 3-6

5 Sub-Claims 

: The student demonstrates FLUENCY in areas set forth in the Standards for Content in grades 3 6.

*Sub-Claim E is only present in grades 3-6

Performance Level Descriptors Grade 3 Example

Performance Level Descriptors Algebra II Example

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Reading Claims  Text complexity  The range of accuracy in expressing reading comprehension demonstrated in student responses  The quality of evidence cited from sources read

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Text Complexity  Three quantitative text complexity measures (Reading Maturity Metric, Source Rater, and Lexile) will be used to analyze all reading passages to determine

ntly a grade level. an initial recommendation f or placement of a text into a grade band and subseque



Complexity Analysis Worksheets (www.PARCConline.org), one for informational text and one for literary text, are th en used to determine qualitative measures. Trained evalu ators use these worksheets to determine a recommendati on for qualitative text complexity within the grade level, with each text defined as readily accessible, moderately c omplex, or very complex.

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Range of Accuracy  Accurate  Mostly accurate  Generally accurate  Minimally accurate  Inaccurate

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Quality of Evidence  Explicit evidence  Inferential evidence

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Writing Claim  Written expression  Knowledge of language and conventions

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Written Expression

Performance Level Descriptors ELA/ Literacy: Knowledge of Language and Conventions

Evidence Tables

 describe the knowledge and skills that an assessment item or a task elicits from students  are grade-level specific  tells how and when standards are assessed  tables include standard, evidence statement, clarifications, associated practices, and calculator designation

Math

Evidence Tables

Evidence Statement Key

• this will list either a CCSS, sub-claim, grade/ course, domain, or cluster • • • •

Evidence Statement Text

• CCSS – will use exact standard language (ex. (8.F.5) sub-claim – will list what the student will be expected to do within the sub-claim as well as the content scope (ex. HS.C.5.11

Reasoning

or 3.D.1

Modeling/Application

) grade/ course – implications of the standards that could be integrated across a grade or course (ex. 4.int.2

integrated across grade 4

or G.int.4

integrated across Geometry

) domain – implications of the standards that could be integrated across a domain (ex. F.Int.1

integrated across the Functions domain

) cluster – implications of standards that could be integrated across a cluster (ex. S-ID.int.1

integrated across interpreting categorical & quantitative data)

Math

Evidence Tables

Clarifications

• provides item developers with guidance on the depth and breadth of the tasks • includes clarifications, limits, emphases, and other information intended to ensure appropriate variety in tasks •

mathematical practices provide guidance on how content should be connected to practices

Math

Evidence Tables Grade 3

Math

Evidence Tables Algebra II

May state: No, Neutral, Item Specific, or Yes

What can a teacher do with this information?

From Arkansas Algebra 1 frameworks document Teacher modified version using information from Evidence Table document

ELA/ Literacy Evidence Tables

 Reading Information  Reading Literary  Vocabulary Interpretation and Use

ELA/ Literacy Evidence Tables: Reading Information

PARCC

Math

Assessment Task Types

Tasks

 The purpose of tasks are to generate evidence for certain sub claims  PBA    Type 1 items (Machine-Scorable) Type II items (Mathematical Reasoning/ Hand-Scored) Type III items (Mathematical Modeling/ Hand-Scored and/ or Machine Scored)  EOY  Type 1 items

only

(All Machine Scorable)

PARCC ELA Assessment Task Types

 Literature Analysis Task  Research Simulation Task  Narrative Writing Task

PARCC ELA Assessment Task Types: Mid Year (MY)

Task Types PBA

PARCC ELA Assessment Task Types End of Year (EOY)

Math

Blueprints

2 point refers to 2 parts, each at 1 point

PARCC Assessment Reference Sheet Grades 5-8

PARCC Assessment Reference Sheet High School