Transcript WH08.ppt
PHOTOFRAGMENTATION OF THE FLUORENE CATION:
NEW EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE USING SEQUENTIAL
MULTIPHOTON ABSORPTION
and
ENERGY-DEPENDENT RATE CONSTANT FOR THE H-LOSS CHANNEL
N.T. Van-Oanh, S. Douin, Ph. Bréchignac
CNRS, Photophysique Moléculaire, Orsay (France)
P. Désesquelles
Astrophysical situation
Competition between fragmentation and
UV radiative cooling by IR emission
Photon
IC
PAH*
Fragment
PAH
Mid-IR
emission
Recent models of the cooling sequence to account for the observed
spectra by
Pech et al (2002)
Verstraete et al (2002)
General Behaviour of Electronic Relaxation
in Aromatic Molecules
Ultrafast Relaxation Dynamics:
330 33 fs
in cations
1E14
« Energy Gap Law » satisfied :
knr= A exp [- (E / h*)]
1E13
+
Cations PAH
+
C6H5F
1E12
Non-adiabatic coupling depends on the
1E11
1E10
k nr
nature of electronic orbitals
Limite
physique
Physical
limit
PAHs neutres
1E9
UltraFast Electronic
Relaxation by
Internal Conversion
from Dn to Dn-1
1E8
1E7
Dérivés polyfluorés
+
du benzène
1000000
• 16 FWHM 160 cm-1
• 330 33 fs
100000
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
E (eV)
2.5
3.0
T. Pino, Ph. Bréchignac, E. Dartois, K. Demyk and L. d’Hendecourt, Chem. Phys. Lett. 339, 64 (2001)
D3-D0 Spectrum of Fluorene+-Argon
Å2
All bands have
Lorentzian shapes
Lifetime broadening
UltraFast electronic
relaxation by
internal conversion
from Dn to Dn-1
•16 FWHM 160 cm-1
• 330 33 fs
Principle of the experimental method :
case of Fluorene cation
• Preparation of the cation by R2PI
h1
(after jet cooling)
• Mass spectrometric detection
of fragmentation
internal energy
controlled by FC
CI
h1
D3
k(2h1)
CI
k(h1)
C13H9+
h1
3817cm-1
Neutral
D0
S1
296nm
S0
C13H9+
Cation
PI = 63741cm-1
C13H10
Energy- dependent rate constant
Analysis of the kinetics
C13H10
log(k(E))
+
h 2
k(2h2)
C13H9+
CI
h 2
Dn
CI
k(h2)
C13H9+
h 2
D0
Exp.1: l= 630 nm (1.97 eV), D3 D0
Exp.2: l= 365 nm (3.4 eV), D4 D0
E
h2
2h2
3h2
} A grid of discrete internal energies
Experimental Scheme
-4C
-2C
MCP-Detector
T.O.F.MS
4
5
6
7
temps de vol (ms)
D3
D0
h1
D0
S1
h2
S0
λ= 630nm, D3 D0 I = 4.3mJ
Mass spectrum
0,0
4.1eV
-0,2
C13H10+
Parent-H
3.8 eV
-0,4
Parent
E0=2.1(eV)
-0,6
6,68
6,72
6,76
6,80
6,84
6,88
6,92
H
C13H9+
Planar equilibrium
Experimental results
λ = 323nm, D4 D0
1,0
Parent
Parent-H
0,8
N/N(0)
I = 0 to 1.4mJ
Parent-H
0,6
0,4
0,2
Parent
0,0
0,0
0,4
0,8
Laser energy (mJ)
6,76
6,78
6,80
6,82
6,84
Time of Flight (ms)
6,86
6,88
1.43
1.328
5
1.00
9
0.84
0
0.70
0
0.39
0
1,2
1,6
Data processing
Kinetic scheme : Competition between further photon absorption
and dissociation
at each
step
Complex treatment :
absorption cross sections (badly known)
& fragmentation rates (unknown)
Hypothesis
j, s1 = s2 = …sj
Non Poisssonian character of
the Photon absorption process
IT FAILS !
Determination of Absorption Cross Sections
Leak by other
fragmentation
channels
Too many adjustable parameters !
2 fitting procedures:
• RRK:
kdiss(E) = k0(1-E0/E)g-1
• PTD:
kdiss(E) = k0(1-E0/(E+EZPE))g-1
The Transition Matrix method
n is the number of steps in time
Adjustments
a) Max = 5 photons if h = 1.97 eV
b) Max = 3 photons if h = 3.4 eV
Quality of final fits
Free adjustment of rate constants
From 1 to 5 photons absorbed
Time of Flight shape analysis
Parent -H
Parent
0,27 mJ
h = 1.97 eV
Only the 3-photon excited state contributes to the H-loss
It gives an independent way of evaluating the rate constant:
CONSISTENT !
Distribution of the number of absorbed photons
in the 11 sets of measurements with h = 1.97 eV
The experimental set of rates
k(E) extends over 4 orders of magnitude
Internal energy E* up to about 5x Eb
Exp.1: l= 630 nm (1.97 eV), D3 D0
Exp.2: l= 365 nm (3.4 eV), D4 D0
NOTE: no time-resolution
Calibrated against linear
absorption cross section
measurement (vdW),
with much care on laser
fluence
Jochims et al. (1994)
Dibben et al. (2001)
RRK:
Better at small excess energy
PTD (Photo-Thermo-Dissociation):
EPZ
Summary
Fragmentation
• dissociation channels identified (H-loss dominant)
• rates obtained over an extended energy domain
• allows extrapolation to long times
Perspective
• Phase Space Theory approach,
with anharmonic quantum density of states
• Experiments with other PAHs
More details in :
J. Phys. Chem. A , 164 (2006)
J. Phys. Chem. A , 168 (2006)